术中药物与血流动力学显著过敏反应相关

R. Freundlich, N. Duggal, Michelle T. Housey, Tyler T Tremper, M. Engoren, S. Kheterpal
{"title":"术中药物与血流动力学显著过敏反应相关","authors":"R. Freundlich, N. Duggal, Michelle T. Housey, Tyler T Tremper, M. Engoren, S. Kheterpal","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000515836.31290.fc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite variations in definitions used, significant numbers of surgical cases are known to be complicated by anaphylaxis. This may be due to drugs such as antibiotics and neuromuscularblocking drugs or even due to latex and disinfectants. Poorly defined patient risk factors and difficulty in accurate and early identification of anaphylaxis by anesthesiologists increase the intraoperative risks. Epinephrine is a widely accepted first line of treatment, and intravenous fluids, antihistamines, and glucocorticoids offer the second line of treatment for anaphylaxis. Intraoperative anaphylaxis mortality is estimated at 0% to 1.4%. The main objective of the study was to identify drugs and patient factors related to hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis in adult patients undergoing surgery. Possible instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were studied from the University of Michigan Anesthesia Information Management System database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis: grade III (shock and/or life-threatening smooth muscle spasm) and grade IV (cardiac and/or respiratory arrest). The screening process used physiologic and treatment-based screening algorithm for identifying hypotension followed by treatment suggestive of anaphylaxis in “hemodynamically significant” adult (≥18 years old) patients. Two clinicians manually reviewed all the cases using predefined criteria, and a third clinician adjudicated any disagreements. Confirmed cases of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were matched 3:1 with control cases and were further reviewed to create a list of medications administered postanesthesia but before the onset of suspected anaphylactic reaction. Intraoperative medications administered in hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis cases and patient risk factors were compared with control cases. A total of 461,986 were studied; of these, 635 met the initial screening criteria, and of these, 55 cases (1 in 8400) were identified for likely hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. It was noted that 52 patients experienced hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (1 patient with 3 instances and 1 patient with 2 instances). Protamine was the only drug associated with an increased risk of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (odds ratio, 11.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–99.26; P = 0.0233) and that no other category of drugs was associated with an increased risk. Only personal history of anaphylaxis was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio, 77.1; 95% confidence interval, 10.46–567.69; P ≤ 0.0001). Other noted results were as follows: low postoperative follow-up and evaluation of patients; serum tryptase level was sent in only 49% of cases (41% positive vs","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Medications Associated With Hemodynamically Significant Anaphylaxis\",\"authors\":\"R. Freundlich, N. Duggal, Michelle T. Housey, Tyler T Tremper, M. Engoren, S. Kheterpal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.sa.0000515836.31290.fc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite variations in definitions used, significant numbers of surgical cases are known to be complicated by anaphylaxis. This may be due to drugs such as antibiotics and neuromuscularblocking drugs or even due to latex and disinfectants. Poorly defined patient risk factors and difficulty in accurate and early identification of anaphylaxis by anesthesiologists increase the intraoperative risks. Epinephrine is a widely accepted first line of treatment, and intravenous fluids, antihistamines, and glucocorticoids offer the second line of treatment for anaphylaxis. Intraoperative anaphylaxis mortality is estimated at 0% to 1.4%. The main objective of the study was to identify drugs and patient factors related to hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis in adult patients undergoing surgery. Possible instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were studied from the University of Michigan Anesthesia Information Management System database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis: grade III (shock and/or life-threatening smooth muscle spasm) and grade IV (cardiac and/or respiratory arrest). The screening process used physiologic and treatment-based screening algorithm for identifying hypotension followed by treatment suggestive of anaphylaxis in “hemodynamically significant” adult (≥18 years old) patients. Two clinicians manually reviewed all the cases using predefined criteria, and a third clinician adjudicated any disagreements. Confirmed cases of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were matched 3:1 with control cases and were further reviewed to create a list of medications administered postanesthesia but before the onset of suspected anaphylactic reaction. Intraoperative medications administered in hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis cases and patient risk factors were compared with control cases. A total of 461,986 were studied; of these, 635 met the initial screening criteria, and of these, 55 cases (1 in 8400) were identified for likely hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. It was noted that 52 patients experienced hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (1 patient with 3 instances and 1 patient with 2 instances). Protamine was the only drug associated with an increased risk of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (odds ratio, 11.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–99.26; P = 0.0233) and that no other category of drugs was associated with an increased risk. Only personal history of anaphylaxis was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio, 77.1; 95% confidence interval, 10.46–567.69; P ≤ 0.0001). Other noted results were as follows: low postoperative follow-up and evaluation of patients; serum tryptase level was sent in only 49% of cases (41% positive vs\",\"PeriodicalId\":22104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000515836.31290.fc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000515836.31290.fc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

尽管使用的定义有所不同,但已知大量手术病例合并过敏反应。这可能是由于药物,如抗生素和神经肌肉阻断药物,甚至是由于乳胶和消毒剂。不明确的患者危险因素和麻醉医师难以准确和早期识别过敏反应增加了术中风险。肾上腺素是被广泛接受的一线治疗方法,静脉输液、抗组胺药和糖皮质激素是过敏反应的二线治疗方法。术中过敏反应死亡率估计为0%至1.4%。该研究的主要目的是确定与接受手术的成人患者血液动力学显著过敏反应相关的药物和患者因素。从2004年至2015年密歇根大学麻醉信息管理系统数据库中研究可能的血流动力学显著性过敏反应病例。主要结局是血流动力学显著的过敏反应:III级(休克和/或危及生命的平滑肌痉挛)和IV级(心脏和/或呼吸骤停)。筛选过程使用基于生理和治疗的筛选算法来识别低血压,然后在“血流动力学显著”的成人(≥18岁)患者中进行提示过敏反应的治疗。两名临床医生使用预定义的标准手动审查所有病例,第三名临床医生裁决任何分歧。确诊的血流动力学显著的过敏反应病例与对照病例3:1匹配,并进一步审查以创建麻醉后但在疑似过敏反应发生之前给予的药物清单。将血流动力学显著的过敏反应病例和患者危险因素与对照病例进行比较。总共研究了461,986人;其中,635例符合最初的筛查标准,其中55例(1 / 8400)被确定为可能有血流动力学意义的过敏反应。值得注意的是,52例患者出现血流动力学显著的过敏反应(1例3例,1例2例)。鱼精蛋白是唯一与血流动力学显著性过敏反应风险增加相关的药物(优势比,11.78;95%置信区间为1.40-99.26;P = 0.0233),并且没有其他类别的药物与风险增加相关。只有个人过敏史与风险增加相关(优势比为77.1;95%置信区间为10.46-567.69;P≤0.0001)。其他值得注意的结果如下:术后随访和患者评价低;血清胰蛋白酶水平仅在49%的病例中被发送(41%阳性vs
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative Medications Associated With Hemodynamically Significant Anaphylaxis
Despite variations in definitions used, significant numbers of surgical cases are known to be complicated by anaphylaxis. This may be due to drugs such as antibiotics and neuromuscularblocking drugs or even due to latex and disinfectants. Poorly defined patient risk factors and difficulty in accurate and early identification of anaphylaxis by anesthesiologists increase the intraoperative risks. Epinephrine is a widely accepted first line of treatment, and intravenous fluids, antihistamines, and glucocorticoids offer the second line of treatment for anaphylaxis. Intraoperative anaphylaxis mortality is estimated at 0% to 1.4%. The main objective of the study was to identify drugs and patient factors related to hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis in adult patients undergoing surgery. Possible instances of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were studied from the University of Michigan Anesthesia Information Management System database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis: grade III (shock and/or life-threatening smooth muscle spasm) and grade IV (cardiac and/or respiratory arrest). The screening process used physiologic and treatment-based screening algorithm for identifying hypotension followed by treatment suggestive of anaphylaxis in “hemodynamically significant” adult (≥18 years old) patients. Two clinicians manually reviewed all the cases using predefined criteria, and a third clinician adjudicated any disagreements. Confirmed cases of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis were matched 3:1 with control cases and were further reviewed to create a list of medications administered postanesthesia but before the onset of suspected anaphylactic reaction. Intraoperative medications administered in hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis cases and patient risk factors were compared with control cases. A total of 461,986 were studied; of these, 635 met the initial screening criteria, and of these, 55 cases (1 in 8400) were identified for likely hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. It was noted that 52 patients experienced hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (1 patient with 3 instances and 1 patient with 2 instances). Protamine was the only drug associated with an increased risk of hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis (odds ratio, 11.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–99.26; P = 0.0233) and that no other category of drugs was associated with an increased risk. Only personal history of anaphylaxis was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio, 77.1; 95% confidence interval, 10.46–567.69; P ≤ 0.0001). Other noted results were as follows: low postoperative follow-up and evaluation of patients; serum tryptase level was sent in only 49% of cases (41% positive vs
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信