应用不同的分析方法确定双车道公路黑点

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
N. Nadimi, Esmaeil Sheikh Hosseini Lori
{"title":"应用不同的分析方法确定双车道公路黑点","authors":"N. Nadimi, Esmaeil Sheikh Hosseini Lori","doi":"10.1080/19439962.2021.1949413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Various analytic methods have been proposed to determine sections with the highest crash risk. Each method has unique specifications and tries to model the crash risk from a different viewpoint. The main objective of this article is to benefit the strengths of three methods that rely on accident data, road safety inspection, and traffic conflict technique to determine black spots for two-lane highways simultaneously. Fuzzy inference system (FIS) is considered as the method to combine the results of these methods and report one number (R MI) as the crash risk for each section. For comparative evaluations, a case study with 20 sections for two consecutive periods was considered in the roads of southeast of Iran. We have tried to select sections with various conditions from crash data, road condition, and surrogate safety measures viewpoint. First, the black spots are determined with the help of previous criteria such as crash frequency (CF), crash rate (CR), empirical Bayes (EB), and equivalent property damage only (EPDO). Then the black spots are specified by the new proposed criteria (R MI). Three tests are applied to compare the efficiency of these five methods. The results indicate that the proposed method is a powerful tool to identify black spots. R MI considers the frequency and severity of observed crashes and at the same time frequency and severity of predicted crashes based on road deficiencies and near crashes. Therefore, it has a more realistic attitude in black spot identification.","PeriodicalId":46672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","volume":"98 1","pages":"1395 - 1418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying different analytic methods to determine black spots in two-lane highways\",\"authors\":\"N. Nadimi, Esmaeil Sheikh Hosseini Lori\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439962.2021.1949413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Various analytic methods have been proposed to determine sections with the highest crash risk. Each method has unique specifications and tries to model the crash risk from a different viewpoint. The main objective of this article is to benefit the strengths of three methods that rely on accident data, road safety inspection, and traffic conflict technique to determine black spots for two-lane highways simultaneously. Fuzzy inference system (FIS) is considered as the method to combine the results of these methods and report one number (R MI) as the crash risk for each section. For comparative evaluations, a case study with 20 sections for two consecutive periods was considered in the roads of southeast of Iran. We have tried to select sections with various conditions from crash data, road condition, and surrogate safety measures viewpoint. First, the black spots are determined with the help of previous criteria such as crash frequency (CF), crash rate (CR), empirical Bayes (EB), and equivalent property damage only (EPDO). Then the black spots are specified by the new proposed criteria (R MI). Three tests are applied to compare the efficiency of these five methods. The results indicate that the proposed method is a powerful tool to identify black spots. R MI considers the frequency and severity of observed crashes and at the same time frequency and severity of predicted crashes based on road deficiencies and near crashes. Therefore, it has a more realistic attitude in black spot identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"1395 - 1418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1949413\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1949413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:人们提出了各种分析方法来确定最高碰撞风险的路段。每种方法都有独特的规范,并试图从不同的角度对崩溃风险进行建模。本文的主要目的是利用事故数据、道路安全检查和交通冲突技术三种方法的优势,同时确定双车道公路的黑点。模糊推理系统(FIS)是将这些方法的结果综合起来,并报告一个数字(rmi)作为每个路段的碰撞风险的方法。为了进行比较评价,考虑了伊朗东南部道路连续两个时期的20个路段的案例研究。我们尝试从碰撞数据、道路状况和替代安全措施的角度选择不同条件的路段。首先,黑点是在先前的标准的帮助下确定的,如碰撞频率(CF)、碰撞率(CR)、经验贝叶斯(EB)和等效财产损失(EPDO)。然后,黑点由新提出的标准(rmi)指定。通过三个试验比较了这五种方法的效率。结果表明,该方法是一种有效的黑点识别工具。rmi考虑观察到的碰撞的频率和严重程度,同时考虑基于道路缺陷和碰撞附近的预测碰撞的频率和严重程度。因此,它在黑点识别中具有更为现实的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying different analytic methods to determine black spots in two-lane highways
Abstract Various analytic methods have been proposed to determine sections with the highest crash risk. Each method has unique specifications and tries to model the crash risk from a different viewpoint. The main objective of this article is to benefit the strengths of three methods that rely on accident data, road safety inspection, and traffic conflict technique to determine black spots for two-lane highways simultaneously. Fuzzy inference system (FIS) is considered as the method to combine the results of these methods and report one number (R MI) as the crash risk for each section. For comparative evaluations, a case study with 20 sections for two consecutive periods was considered in the roads of southeast of Iran. We have tried to select sections with various conditions from crash data, road condition, and surrogate safety measures viewpoint. First, the black spots are determined with the help of previous criteria such as crash frequency (CF), crash rate (CR), empirical Bayes (EB), and equivalent property damage only (EPDO). Then the black spots are specified by the new proposed criteria (R MI). Three tests are applied to compare the efficiency of these five methods. The results indicate that the proposed method is a powerful tool to identify black spots. R MI considers the frequency and severity of observed crashes and at the same time frequency and severity of predicted crashes based on road deficiencies and near crashes. Therefore, it has a more realistic attitude in black spot identification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信