乌干达豇豆种质产量及抗赤霉病评价

E. Afutu, K. E. Mohammed, T. Odong, M. Biruma, P. Rubaihayo
{"title":"乌干达豇豆种质产量及抗赤霉病评价","authors":"E. Afutu, K. E. Mohammed, T. Odong, M. Biruma, P. Rubaihayo","doi":"10.9734/AJEA/2016/25138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study was conducted to identify cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars with high yield potential and resistance to scab disease caused by Sphaceloma sp. in Uganda. 100 cowpea genotypes were evaluated at two locations (Kabanyolo and Serere) in Uganda between April and July, 2014 using a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design. Place and Duration of Study: Makerere University Agriculture Research Institute Kabanyolo (MUARIK) and the National Semi Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI) – Serere between April to July, 2014. Study Design and Methodology: Hundred cowpea lines (69 landraces, 25 inbred lines at F7, 1 local and 5 improved cultivars) were grown at each location in a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design with 3 replications to assess their reaction to the scab disease and yield potential (grain yield and yield related traits). Results: The cowpea lines differed significantly (P = .05) in their response to natural disease Original Research Article Afutu et al.; AJEA, 12(2): 1-18, 2016; Article no.AJEA.25138 2 pressure as determined by disease incidence, apparent infection rate (r) and severity indicated by area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). Analysis of variance showed that there was highly significant differences (P < .001) in genotypes, locations, AUDPC and other traits and genotype by location (G×L) interaction on AUDPC. The correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship of scab disease incidence with AUDPC (0.8; P < .001) but a significant (P < .001) negative relationship with grain yield (-0.8), number of pods per plant (-0.5), number of seeds per pod (-0.5) and 100 seed weight (-0.5). Cluster analysis based on only scab disease indexes produced 4 main clusters while cluster analysis based on disease and yield traits produced 3 main clusters. However, the two different clusters revealed similar grouping patterns in which cowpea lines with similar resistance ratings were shown to form unique clusters. R-mode principal component analysis yielded 4 principal components explaining 62.28% of the variation observed. Conclusion: The study revealed that the use of apparent infection rate “r” alone as an index for rating a genotype for scab reaction was not decisive. One line (NE 15) was found to be resistant to the scab disease at both locations and high yielding and could be used in the cowpea improvement programme to breed for resistance to the scab disease.","PeriodicalId":7714,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Ugandan Cowpea Germplasm for Yield and Resistance to Scab Disease\",\"authors\":\"E. Afutu, K. E. Mohammed, T. Odong, M. Biruma, P. Rubaihayo\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/AJEA/2016/25138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study was conducted to identify cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars with high yield potential and resistance to scab disease caused by Sphaceloma sp. in Uganda. 100 cowpea genotypes were evaluated at two locations (Kabanyolo and Serere) in Uganda between April and July, 2014 using a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design. Place and Duration of Study: Makerere University Agriculture Research Institute Kabanyolo (MUARIK) and the National Semi Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI) – Serere between April to July, 2014. Study Design and Methodology: Hundred cowpea lines (69 landraces, 25 inbred lines at F7, 1 local and 5 improved cultivars) were grown at each location in a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design with 3 replications to assess their reaction to the scab disease and yield potential (grain yield and yield related traits). Results: The cowpea lines differed significantly (P = .05) in their response to natural disease Original Research Article Afutu et al.; AJEA, 12(2): 1-18, 2016; Article no.AJEA.25138 2 pressure as determined by disease incidence, apparent infection rate (r) and severity indicated by area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). Analysis of variance showed that there was highly significant differences (P < .001) in genotypes, locations, AUDPC and other traits and genotype by location (G×L) interaction on AUDPC. The correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship of scab disease incidence with AUDPC (0.8; P < .001) but a significant (P < .001) negative relationship with grain yield (-0.8), number of pods per plant (-0.5), number of seeds per pod (-0.5) and 100 seed weight (-0.5). Cluster analysis based on only scab disease indexes produced 4 main clusters while cluster analysis based on disease and yield traits produced 3 main clusters. However, the two different clusters revealed similar grouping patterns in which cowpea lines with similar resistance ratings were shown to form unique clusters. R-mode principal component analysis yielded 4 principal components explaining 62.28% of the variation observed. Conclusion: The study revealed that the use of apparent infection rate “r” alone as an index for rating a genotype for scab reaction was not decisive. One line (NE 15) was found to be resistant to the scab disease at both locations and high yielding and could be used in the cowpea improvement programme to breed for resistance to the scab disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Experimental Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Experimental Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2016/25138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2016/25138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:利用10 × 10 α格设计,于2014年4 - 7月在乌干达两个地点(Kabanyolo和Serere)对100个豇豆基因型进行了鉴定,以鉴定具有高产潜力和抗Sphaceloma sp.痂病的豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)品种。研究地点和时间:Makerere大学农业研究所Kabanyolo (MUARIK)和国家半干旱资源研究所(NaSARRI) - 2014年4月至7月。研究设计和方法:采用10 × 10 α晶格设计,在每个地点种植100个豇豆品系(69个地方品系,25个F7自交系,1个地方品系和5个改良品系),3个重复,评估它们对赤霉病的反应和产量潜力(籽粒产量和产量相关性状)。结果:豇豆品系对自然病害的反应差异有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。农业工程学报,12(2):1-18,2016;文章no.AJEA。以疾病发病率、表观感染率(r)和疾病进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)表示的严重程度来确定压力。方差分析显示,基因型、位点、AUDPC等性状和基因型与位点(G×L)互作在AUDPC上存在极显著差异(P < 0.001)。相关分析显示结痂病发生率与AUDPC呈正相关(0.8;P < 0.001),但与籽粒产量(-0.8)、单株荚果数(-0.5)、单株荚果数(-0.5)和百粒重(-0.5)呈显著负相关(P < 0.001)。仅基于病害指标的聚类分析得到4个主要聚类,而基于病害性状和产量性状的聚类分析得到3个主要聚类。然而,两个不同的簇显示出相似的分组模式,具有相似抗性等级的豇豆株系形成独特的簇。r型主成分分析得到4个主成分,解释了62.28%的变异。结论:单纯以表观感染率“r”作为评价结痂反应基因型的指标不具有决定性。其中一个品系(ne15)在两个地点均具有抗痂病性和高产性,可用于豇豆抗痂病育种的改良计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Ugandan Cowpea Germplasm for Yield and Resistance to Scab Disease
Aims: This study was conducted to identify cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars with high yield potential and resistance to scab disease caused by Sphaceloma sp. in Uganda. 100 cowpea genotypes were evaluated at two locations (Kabanyolo and Serere) in Uganda between April and July, 2014 using a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design. Place and Duration of Study: Makerere University Agriculture Research Institute Kabanyolo (MUARIK) and the National Semi Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI) – Serere between April to July, 2014. Study Design and Methodology: Hundred cowpea lines (69 landraces, 25 inbred lines at F7, 1 local and 5 improved cultivars) were grown at each location in a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design with 3 replications to assess their reaction to the scab disease and yield potential (grain yield and yield related traits). Results: The cowpea lines differed significantly (P = .05) in their response to natural disease Original Research Article Afutu et al.; AJEA, 12(2): 1-18, 2016; Article no.AJEA.25138 2 pressure as determined by disease incidence, apparent infection rate (r) and severity indicated by area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). Analysis of variance showed that there was highly significant differences (P < .001) in genotypes, locations, AUDPC and other traits and genotype by location (G×L) interaction on AUDPC. The correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship of scab disease incidence with AUDPC (0.8; P < .001) but a significant (P < .001) negative relationship with grain yield (-0.8), number of pods per plant (-0.5), number of seeds per pod (-0.5) and 100 seed weight (-0.5). Cluster analysis based on only scab disease indexes produced 4 main clusters while cluster analysis based on disease and yield traits produced 3 main clusters. However, the two different clusters revealed similar grouping patterns in which cowpea lines with similar resistance ratings were shown to form unique clusters. R-mode principal component analysis yielded 4 principal components explaining 62.28% of the variation observed. Conclusion: The study revealed that the use of apparent infection rate “r” alone as an index for rating a genotype for scab reaction was not decisive. One line (NE 15) was found to be resistant to the scab disease at both locations and high yielding and could be used in the cowpea improvement programme to breed for resistance to the scab disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信