臂丛闭合性牵引性损伤不同手术方法的疗效分析

Q3 Medicine
Сергей Петрович Бажанов, С.Д. Шувалов, Г.А. Коршунова, Ш.М. Айтемиров, В.В. Островский, S. Bazhanov, S. D. Shuvalov, G. A. Korshunova, Sh.M. Аjtemirov, V. Ostrovskij
{"title":"臂丛闭合性牵引性损伤不同手术方法的疗效分析","authors":"Сергей Петрович Бажанов, С.Д. Шувалов, Г.А. Коршунова, Ш.М. Айтемиров, В.В. Островский, S. Bazhanov, S. D. Shuvalov, G. A. Korshunova, Sh.M. Аjtemirov, V. Ostrovskij","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-351-356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus and analysis of the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with this pathology are the relevant challenges in neurosurgery, neurology, traumatology, orthopedics and rehabilitation due to the high social and economic significance, incidence and poor short- and long-term outcomes in this cohort of patients. This study was aimed at comparing the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Material and methods The study involved 96 patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus divided into three groups according to the method of their surgical treatment. Patients of Group I (n = 33) underwent microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks; patients of Group II (n = 28) had microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus; patients of Group III (n = 35) had microsurgical neurolysis with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus as well as the segmental spinal cord apparatus at the level of the cervical intumescence. The clinical status and functionality of the upper limb were assessed after 6 months with clinical and neurological tests, scoring methods, and electrophysiological monitoring.Results We analyzed the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus to prove a significant improvement in the outcomes of Group III patients who featured a faster rate of pain regression in the injured upper limb as well as significantly positive changes in clinical, neurological and electrophysiological indicators.Discussion The reduction in the total regional pain syndrome and restoration of the affected limb function was more evident in Group III patients what supports the favor of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with two-level electrical stimulation for closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Conclusions The analysis of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus revealed a significant efficacy of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with electrostimulation of the injured nerve trunk and segmental spinal cord apparatus (Group III). It improves the outcomes in this cohort of patients.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"2 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of various surgical techniques used in patients with closed traction injuries of the brachial plexus\",\"authors\":\"Сергей Петрович Бажанов, С.Д. Шувалов, Г.А. Коршунова, Ш.М. Айтемиров, В.В. Островский, S. Bazhanov, S. D. Shuvalov, G. A. Korshunova, Sh.M. Аjtemirov, V. Ostrovskij\",\"doi\":\"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-351-356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus and analysis of the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with this pathology are the relevant challenges in neurosurgery, neurology, traumatology, orthopedics and rehabilitation due to the high social and economic significance, incidence and poor short- and long-term outcomes in this cohort of patients. This study was aimed at comparing the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Material and methods The study involved 96 patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus divided into three groups according to the method of their surgical treatment. Patients of Group I (n = 33) underwent microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks; patients of Group II (n = 28) had microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus; patients of Group III (n = 35) had microsurgical neurolysis with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus as well as the segmental spinal cord apparatus at the level of the cervical intumescence. The clinical status and functionality of the upper limb were assessed after 6 months with clinical and neurological tests, scoring methods, and electrophysiological monitoring.Results We analyzed the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus to prove a significant improvement in the outcomes of Group III patients who featured a faster rate of pain regression in the injured upper limb as well as significantly positive changes in clinical, neurological and electrophysiological indicators.Discussion The reduction in the total regional pain syndrome and restoration of the affected limb function was more evident in Group III patients what supports the favor of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with two-level electrical stimulation for closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Conclusions The analysis of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus revealed a significant efficacy of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with electrostimulation of the injured nerve trunk and segmental spinal cord apparatus (Group III). It improves the outcomes in this cohort of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"volume\":\"2 7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-351-356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-351-356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

臂丛外伤性病变以及对该病变患者的各种手术技术的疗效分析是神经外科、神经病学、创伤学、骨科和康复学的相关挑战,因为这类患者具有很高的社会和经济意义,发病率高,短期和长期预后差。本研究旨在比较臂丛闭合性损伤患者不同手术方法的疗效。材料与方法将96例闭合性臂丛损伤患者根据手术治疗方法分为3组。第一组(33例)行显微外科臂丛干神经松解术;II组(28例)行臂丛干显微外科神经松解术,在臂丛干上植入刺激型多通道电极;第三组(35例)采用显微外科神经松解术,在颈肿胀水平的臂丛干和节段性脊髓装置上植入刺激多通道电极。6个月后通过临床和神经学检查、评分方法和电生理监测评估上肢的临床状况和功能。结果我们分析了闭合性臂丛损伤患者的各种手术方法的结果,证明III组患者的结果有显著改善,其损伤上肢疼痛消退速度更快,临床、神经学和电生理指标均有明显的积极变化。在III组患者中,全区域疼痛综合征的减轻和患肢功能的恢复更为明显,这支持了显微外科神经松解联合二级电刺激治疗臂丛闭合性损伤的优势。结论对臂丛闭合性损伤患者的各种手术方法进行分析,发现显微外科神经松解术联合电刺激损伤神经干和脊髓节段器(III组)疗效显著,改善了该队列患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of various surgical techniques used in patients with closed traction injuries of the brachial plexus
Introduction Traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus and analysis of the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with this pathology are the relevant challenges in neurosurgery, neurology, traumatology, orthopedics and rehabilitation due to the high social and economic significance, incidence and poor short- and long-term outcomes in this cohort of patients. This study was aimed at comparing the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Material and methods The study involved 96 patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus divided into three groups according to the method of their surgical treatment. Patients of Group I (n = 33) underwent microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks; patients of Group II (n = 28) had microsurgical neurolysis of their brachial plexus trunks with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus; patients of Group III (n = 35) had microsurgical neurolysis with stimulating multichannel electrodes implanted on the trunks of their brachial plexus as well as the segmental spinal cord apparatus at the level of the cervical intumescence. The clinical status and functionality of the upper limb were assessed after 6 months with clinical and neurological tests, scoring methods, and electrophysiological monitoring.Results We analyzed the outcomes of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus to prove a significant improvement in the outcomes of Group III patients who featured a faster rate of pain regression in the injured upper limb as well as significantly positive changes in clinical, neurological and electrophysiological indicators.Discussion The reduction in the total regional pain syndrome and restoration of the affected limb function was more evident in Group III patients what supports the favor of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with two-level electrical stimulation for closed injuries of the brachial plexus.Conclusions The analysis of various surgical techniques in patients with closed injuries of the brachial plexus revealed a significant efficacy of microsurgical neurolysis in combination with electrostimulation of the injured nerve trunk and segmental spinal cord apparatus (Group III). It improves the outcomes in this cohort of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信