教育的政治性质与教育霸权斗争中的政治定位

Remzi Onur Kükürt
{"title":"教育的政治性质与教育霸权斗争中的政治定位","authors":"Remzi Onur Kükürt","doi":"10.17478/jegys.1219312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern political understanding defines politics only within the boundaries of a political society immanent to the state, such as parliament and political parties. Within the framework of this understanding, it is discussed whether education is included in the political field. In this direction, although formal education is planned under the control of political powers, they are trying to define it outside the political field and turn it into a unilateral hegemony device. As this limited definition of the political, the importance of civil society in politics began to increase, the political struggle first expanded to the field of hegemony between civil society structures such as Trade Unions, and then the borders of the political expanded from the field of the state to the entire social field, especially within the framework of Foucaultian biopolitics and understanding of power. As a matter of fact, Foucault draws attention to the emergence contingency of the power relation wherever there is a mode of subjectivity in a relationality while revealing himself in the subject, instead of positioning the power in the field of the state alone. Thus, wherever the power is, there is the opportunity for resistance to emerge and the boundaries of the political to expand (Foucault, 2016). \nIn this framework, the expansion of the borders of the political sphere towards the social sphere destroyed the one-sided perception of the concept of hegemony under the control of the state or the ruling class, and with the influence of Gramsci (1999), the concept of counter-hegemony and the struggle for hegemony emerged. The field of education should be understood as a field of political struggle as it contains many political confrontations that conflict with each other, such as power, education trade unions, education policies, educational designs such as teachers, students and families. Thus, the field of education appears, on the one hand, in the structural political struggle between the political power and \"Education Trade Unions\", and on the other hand, as a field of hegemony that includes particular subject movements and political subject positions, such as students and teachers.","PeriodicalId":30787,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Nature of Education and Political Placements in the Struggle of Hegemony in Education\",\"authors\":\"Remzi Onur Kükürt\",\"doi\":\"10.17478/jegys.1219312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern political understanding defines politics only within the boundaries of a political society immanent to the state, such as parliament and political parties. Within the framework of this understanding, it is discussed whether education is included in the political field. In this direction, although formal education is planned under the control of political powers, they are trying to define it outside the political field and turn it into a unilateral hegemony device. As this limited definition of the political, the importance of civil society in politics began to increase, the political struggle first expanded to the field of hegemony between civil society structures such as Trade Unions, and then the borders of the political expanded from the field of the state to the entire social field, especially within the framework of Foucaultian biopolitics and understanding of power. As a matter of fact, Foucault draws attention to the emergence contingency of the power relation wherever there is a mode of subjectivity in a relationality while revealing himself in the subject, instead of positioning the power in the field of the state alone. Thus, wherever the power is, there is the opportunity for resistance to emerge and the boundaries of the political to expand (Foucault, 2016). \\nIn this framework, the expansion of the borders of the political sphere towards the social sphere destroyed the one-sided perception of the concept of hegemony under the control of the state or the ruling class, and with the influence of Gramsci (1999), the concept of counter-hegemony and the struggle for hegemony emerged. The field of education should be understood as a field of political struggle as it contains many political confrontations that conflict with each other, such as power, education trade unions, education policies, educational designs such as teachers, students and families. Thus, the field of education appears, on the one hand, in the structural political struggle between the political power and \\\"Education Trade Unions\\\", and on the other hand, as a field of hegemony that includes particular subject movements and political subject positions, such as students and teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1219312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1219312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代政治理解只在国家内在的政治社会范围内定义政治,如议会和政党。在这种理解的框架内,讨论了教育是否包括在政治领域。在这个方向上,虽然正规教育是在政治权力的控制下策划的,但他们试图将其定义在政治领域之外,并将其变成单边霸权的工具。随着对政治的这种有限的定义,公民社会在政治中的重要性开始增加,政治斗争首先扩展到工会等公民社会结构之间的霸权领域,然后政治的边界从国家领域扩展到整个社会领域,特别是在福柯的生命政治和对权力的理解的框架内。事实上,福柯关注的是权力关系的突现偶然性,只要在一种关系中存在一种主体性模式,同时在主体中揭示自己,而不是将权力单独定位在国家的领域中。因此,无论权力在哪里,都有机会出现抵抗,政治边界也会扩大(福柯,2016)。在这一框架下,政治领域边界向社会领域的扩张打破了对国家或统治阶级控制下的霸权概念的片面认知,并在葛兰西(1999)的影响下,出现了反霸权和争夺霸权的概念。教育领域应该被理解为一个政治斗争领域,因为它包含了许多相互冲突的政治对抗,如权力、教育工会、教育政策、教育设计,如教师、学生和家庭。因此,教育场域一方面表现为政治权力与“教育工会”之间的结构性政治斗争,另一方面又表现为包括学生、教师等特定主体运动和政治主体立场的霸权场域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Political Nature of Education and Political Placements in the Struggle of Hegemony in Education
The modern political understanding defines politics only within the boundaries of a political society immanent to the state, such as parliament and political parties. Within the framework of this understanding, it is discussed whether education is included in the political field. In this direction, although formal education is planned under the control of political powers, they are trying to define it outside the political field and turn it into a unilateral hegemony device. As this limited definition of the political, the importance of civil society in politics began to increase, the political struggle first expanded to the field of hegemony between civil society structures such as Trade Unions, and then the borders of the political expanded from the field of the state to the entire social field, especially within the framework of Foucaultian biopolitics and understanding of power. As a matter of fact, Foucault draws attention to the emergence contingency of the power relation wherever there is a mode of subjectivity in a relationality while revealing himself in the subject, instead of positioning the power in the field of the state alone. Thus, wherever the power is, there is the opportunity for resistance to emerge and the boundaries of the political to expand (Foucault, 2016). In this framework, the expansion of the borders of the political sphere towards the social sphere destroyed the one-sided perception of the concept of hegemony under the control of the state or the ruling class, and with the influence of Gramsci (1999), the concept of counter-hegemony and the struggle for hegemony emerged. The field of education should be understood as a field of political struggle as it contains many political confrontations that conflict with each other, such as power, education trade unions, education policies, educational designs such as teachers, students and families. Thus, the field of education appears, on the one hand, in the structural political struggle between the political power and "Education Trade Unions", and on the other hand, as a field of hegemony that includes particular subject movements and political subject positions, such as students and teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists (JEGYS) ISSN: 2149-360X covers issues such as science education, differentiated instruction in mathematics, science and social sciences for gifted students, education and training of the young scientist, giftedness, gifted education, scientific creativity, educational policy on science and math education for gifted students, teaching of the history and philosophy of science, STEM education for gifted, teaching techniques and activities in the education of the gifted young scientist, is a scientific and academic journal. JEGYS aims to be a scientific media sharing scientific research, practices, theories and ideas about gifted education and education of the gifted young scientists. STEM education for gifted, teaching techniques and activities in the education of the gifted young scientist, is a scientific and academic journal. JEGYS aims to be a scientific media sharing scientific research, practices, theories and ideas about gifted education and education of the gifted young scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信