葡萄牙语第二语言写作评价中的思想密度和语法复杂性

Ângela Filipe Lopes
{"title":"葡萄牙语第二语言写作评价中的思想密度和语法复杂性","authors":"Ângela Filipe Lopes","doi":"10.21747/1647-8770/are12a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced L2 written production assessment is difficult to quantify as are learning goals established for this competence in the same level. Correction is not enough. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness, as well as sentence complexity. In order to measure these characteristics of sophisticated writing, Idea Density and Grammatical Complexity are proposed as assessment parameters as they were explored by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). Its adoption to the advanced Portuguese L2 learning context (C1/C2) underlied the study of sentences produced in two writing tasks: a synthesis and a writing prompt. First, results were highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures were found to be correlated in both writing tasks, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences. Lastly, the results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read as the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters.","PeriodicalId":30280,"journal":{"name":"Linguarum Arena Revista do Programa Doutoral em Didactica de Linguas da Universidade do Porto","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A densidade de ideias e a complexidade gramatical na avaliação da produção escrita em português L2\",\"authors\":\"Ângela Filipe Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.21747/1647-8770/are12a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advanced L2 written production assessment is difficult to quantify as are learning goals established for this competence in the same level. Correction is not enough. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness, as well as sentence complexity. In order to measure these characteristics of sophisticated writing, Idea Density and Grammatical Complexity are proposed as assessment parameters as they were explored by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). Its adoption to the advanced Portuguese L2 learning context (C1/C2) underlied the study of sentences produced in two writing tasks: a synthesis and a writing prompt. First, results were highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures were found to be correlated in both writing tasks, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences. Lastly, the results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read as the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguarum Arena Revista do Programa Doutoral em Didactica de Linguas da Universidade do Porto\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguarum Arena Revista do Programa Doutoral em Didactica de Linguas da Universidade do Porto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21747/1647-8770/are12a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguarum Arena Revista do Programa Doutoral em Didactica de Linguas da Universidade do Porto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/1647-8770/are12a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级第二语言书面成果评估很难量化,因为在同一水平上为该能力建立的学习目标也很难量化。纠正是不够的。写作的质量被期望转化为词汇的精确和丰富,以及句子的复杂性。为了衡量复杂写作的这些特征,Snowdon et al.(1996)和Kemper et al.(2001)在《修女研究》(Snowdon 2001)中提出了思想密度和语法复杂性作为评估参数。它在高级葡萄牙语第二语言学习语境(C1/C2)中的采用,是对两种写作任务中产生的句子进行研究的基础:综合和写作提示。首先,由于参与者群体的异质性,结果是高度可变的。研究发现,这两项指标在两项写作任务中都是相关的,这就得出了这样的结论:词汇准确、词汇丰富的参与者也能写出更复杂的句子。最后,结果证实了阅读对写作质量的影响,因为经常阅读的学生在两个参数中都得到了最高分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A densidade de ideias e a complexidade gramatical na avaliação da produção escrita em português L2
Advanced L2 written production assessment is difficult to quantify as are learning goals established for this competence in the same level. Correction is not enough. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness, as well as sentence complexity. In order to measure these characteristics of sophisticated writing, Idea Density and Grammatical Complexity are proposed as assessment parameters as they were explored by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). Its adoption to the advanced Portuguese L2 learning context (C1/C2) underlied the study of sentences produced in two writing tasks: a synthesis and a writing prompt. First, results were highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures were found to be correlated in both writing tasks, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences. Lastly, the results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read as the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信