移动医疗干预对亚洲 II 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和 HbA1c 改善的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Accounting and Business Research Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-17 DOI:10.4103/ijem.ijem_387_21
Divya Verma, Yogesh Bahurupi, Ravi Kant, Mahendra Singh, Pradeep Aggarwal, Vartika Saxena
{"title":"移动医疗干预对亚洲 II 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和 HbA1c 改善的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Divya Verma, Yogesh Bahurupi, Ravi Kant, Mahendra Singh, Pradeep Aggarwal, Vartika Saxena","doi":"10.4103/ijem.ijem_387_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, it is pertinent to educate and inform diabetes patients about their self-management. It can be done effectively using innovative methods like mobile health (mHealth), which includes mobile applications, phone calls, and text messages. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for the management of diabetes compared with usual care in the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Searches were performed in electronic databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, in August and September 2020. Search terms used were \"Diabetes Mellitus,\" \"mHealth,\" \"glycemic control\", \"HbA1c levels,\" and \"Blood glucose levels.\" The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin and blood glucose levels. Trials were pooled, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 3980 abstracts, of which 18 trials met the inclusion criteria. Lowering of Hba1c levels was reported in the majority of trials, which aided in Glycemic control. For post prandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels, a statistically significant reduction of value -20.13 (95%CI -35.16 to -5.10, <i>P</i> = 0.009, I<sup>2</sup> = 59%) was seen in the mean in the intervention group, whereas for HbA1c levels the mean reduction in the intervention group was -0.44 (95%CI, -0.79 to 0.10, <i>P</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 87%). Although these interventions proved beneficial for these outcomes, there was a difference in the amount of effects caused by different mHealth interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study acknowledged the effects of different mHealth interventions as per their accessibility and availability in recent years. There is a need to include more studies in future reviews to generate a larger body of evidence for the reported outcomes. The researchers should give the utmost priority to the transparency while reporting the interventions for effective interpretation of the retrieved data.</p>","PeriodicalId":7054,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Business Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"484-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of mHealth Interventions on Glycemic Control and HbA1c Improvement among Type II Diabetes Patients in Asian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Divya Verma, Yogesh Bahurupi, Ravi Kant, Mahendra Singh, Pradeep Aggarwal, Vartika Saxena\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijem.ijem_387_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, it is pertinent to educate and inform diabetes patients about their self-management. It can be done effectively using innovative methods like mobile health (mHealth), which includes mobile applications, phone calls, and text messages. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for the management of diabetes compared with usual care in the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Searches were performed in electronic databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, in August and September 2020. Search terms used were \\\"Diabetes Mellitus,\\\" \\\"mHealth,\\\" \\\"glycemic control\\\", \\\"HbA1c levels,\\\" and \\\"Blood glucose levels.\\\" The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin and blood glucose levels. Trials were pooled, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 3980 abstracts, of which 18 trials met the inclusion criteria. Lowering of Hba1c levels was reported in the majority of trials, which aided in Glycemic control. For post prandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels, a statistically significant reduction of value -20.13 (95%CI -35.16 to -5.10, <i>P</i> = 0.009, I<sup>2</sup> = 59%) was seen in the mean in the intervention group, whereas for HbA1c levels the mean reduction in the intervention group was -0.44 (95%CI, -0.79 to 0.10, <i>P</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 87%). Although these interventions proved beneficial for these outcomes, there was a difference in the amount of effects caused by different mHealth interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study acknowledged the effects of different mHealth interventions as per their accessibility and availability in recent years. There is a need to include more studies in future reviews to generate a larger body of evidence for the reported outcomes. The researchers should give the utmost priority to the transparency while reporting the interventions for effective interpretation of the retrieved data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and Business Research\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"484-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_387_21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_387_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于糖尿病的高发病率,对糖尿病患者进行自我管理方面的教育和宣传非常重要。使用创新方法,如移动医疗(mHealth),包括移动应用程序、电话和短信,可以有效地做到这一点。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,总结了在亚洲人群中,与常规护理相比,移动医疗干预对糖尿病管理的有效性:于 2020 年 8 月和 9 月在 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 等电子数据库中进行了检索。使用的检索词包括 "糖尿病"、"移动医疗"、"血糖控制"、"HbA1c 水平 "和 "血糖水平"。主要结果是糖化血红蛋白和血糖水平。对试验进行了汇总,并使用 I2 统计量对异质性进行了量化:结果:检索共获得 3980 篇摘要,其中 18 项试验符合纳入标准。大多数试验报告了降低 Hba1c 水平的情况,这有助于控制血糖。就餐后血糖(PPBG)水平而言,干预组的平均值为-20.13(95%CI -35.16至-5.10,P = 0.009,I2 = 59%),下降幅度具有统计学意义;而就 HbA1c 水平而言,干预组的平均值为-0.44(95%CI,-0.79至0.10,P = 0.01,I2 = 87%),下降幅度具有统计学意义。虽然这些干预措施证明对这些结果有益,但不同的移动医疗干预措施所产生的效果存在差异:本研究根据近年来不同移动医疗干预措施的可及性和可用性对其效果进行了确认。有必要在今后的审查中纳入更多的研究,以便为所报告的结果提供更多的证据。研究人员在报告干预措施时应高度重视透明度,以便有效解释检索到的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of mHealth Interventions on Glycemic Control and HbA1c Improvement among Type II Diabetes Patients in Asian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Due to the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, it is pertinent to educate and inform diabetes patients about their self-management. It can be done effectively using innovative methods like mobile health (mHealth), which includes mobile applications, phone calls, and text messages. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for the management of diabetes compared with usual care in the Asian population.

Materials and methods: Searches were performed in electronic databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, in August and September 2020. Search terms used were "Diabetes Mellitus," "mHealth," "glycemic control", "HbA1c levels," and "Blood glucose levels." The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin and blood glucose levels. Trials were pooled, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.

Results: The search yielded 3980 abstracts, of which 18 trials met the inclusion criteria. Lowering of Hba1c levels was reported in the majority of trials, which aided in Glycemic control. For post prandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels, a statistically significant reduction of value -20.13 (95%CI -35.16 to -5.10, P = 0.009, I2 = 59%) was seen in the mean in the intervention group, whereas for HbA1c levels the mean reduction in the intervention group was -0.44 (95%CI, -0.79 to 0.10, P = 0.01, I2 = 87%). Although these interventions proved beneficial for these outcomes, there was a difference in the amount of effects caused by different mHealth interventions.

Conclusion: This study acknowledged the effects of different mHealth interventions as per their accessibility and availability in recent years. There is a need to include more studies in future reviews to generate a larger body of evidence for the reported outcomes. The researchers should give the utmost priority to the transparency while reporting the interventions for effective interpretation of the retrieved data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting and Business Research publishes papers containing a substantial and original contribution to knowledge. Papers may cover any area of accounting, broadly defined and including corporate governance, auditing and taxation. However the focus must be accounting, rather than (corporate) finance or general management. Authors may take a theoretical or an empirical approach, using either quantitative or qualitative methods. They may aim to contribute to developing and understanding the role of accounting in business. Papers should be rigorous but also written in a way that makes them intelligible to a wide range of academics and, where appropriate, practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信