在亚马逊热带稀树草原上,准备燃烧可能不会提高种子的短期存活率

V. J. U. Rodriguez Chuma, D. Norris, T. P. da Silva, J. A. da Silva, K. Cavalcante, Igor A. P. Sidônio, A. F. de Souza, D. S. S. Valentim, S. Mochiutti, F. Michalski
{"title":"在亚马逊热带稀树草原上,准备燃烧可能不会提高种子的短期存活率","authors":"V. J. U. Rodriguez Chuma, D. Norris, T. P. da Silva, J. A. da Silva, K. Cavalcante, Igor A. P. Sidônio, A. F. de Souza, D. S. S. Valentim, S. Mochiutti, F. Michalski","doi":"10.1017/exp.2021.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The role of fire in the management of degraded areas remains strongly debated. Here we experimentally compare removal and infestation of popcorn kernels (Zea mays L. – Poaceae) and açaí fruits (Euterpe oleracea Mart. – Arecaceae) in one burned and two unburned savanna habitats in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. In each habitat, a total of ten experimental units (five per seed type) were installed, each with three treatments: (1) open access, (2) vertebrate access, and (3) invertebrate access. Generalized linear models showed significant differences in both seed removal (P < 0.0001) and infestation (P < 0.0001) among seed type, habitats and access treatments. Burned savanna had the highest overall seed infestation rate (24.3%) and invertebrate access increased açaí seed infestation levels to 100% in the burned savanna. Increased levels of invertebrate seed infestation in burned savanna suggest that preparation burning may be of limited use for the management and restoration of such habitats in tropical regions.","PeriodicalId":12269,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Results","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparation burning may not improve short-term seed survival in an Amazonian savanna\",\"authors\":\"V. J. U. Rodriguez Chuma, D. Norris, T. P. da Silva, J. A. da Silva, K. Cavalcante, Igor A. P. Sidônio, A. F. de Souza, D. S. S. Valentim, S. Mochiutti, F. Michalski\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/exp.2021.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The role of fire in the management of degraded areas remains strongly debated. Here we experimentally compare removal and infestation of popcorn kernels (Zea mays L. – Poaceae) and açaí fruits (Euterpe oleracea Mart. – Arecaceae) in one burned and two unburned savanna habitats in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. In each habitat, a total of ten experimental units (five per seed type) were installed, each with three treatments: (1) open access, (2) vertebrate access, and (3) invertebrate access. Generalized linear models showed significant differences in both seed removal (P < 0.0001) and infestation (P < 0.0001) among seed type, habitats and access treatments. Burned savanna had the highest overall seed infestation rate (24.3%) and invertebrate access increased açaí seed infestation levels to 100% in the burned savanna. Increased levels of invertebrate seed infestation in burned savanna suggest that preparation burning may be of limited use for the management and restoration of such habitats in tropical regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Results\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Results\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/exp.2021.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Results","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/exp.2021.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火灾在退化地区管理中的作用仍然存在激烈的争论。本文通过实验比较了玉米粒(Zea mays L. - Poaceae)和açaí果实(Euterpe oleracea Mart)的去除和侵染效果。-槟榔科)在巴西亚马逊东部一个被烧毁和两个未被烧毁的稀树草原栖息地。每个生境共设置了10个实验单元(每种种子类型5个),每个实验单元有三种处理:(1)开放通道,(2)脊椎动物通道,(3)无脊椎动物通道。广义线性模型显示,不同种子类型、不同生境和不同通路处理在种子去除率(P < 0.0001)和侵染率(P < 0.0001)上存在显著差异。在被烧毁的热带稀树草原上,种子侵染率最高(24.3%),无脊椎动物的进入使种子侵染率açaí增加到100%。被烧毁的热带稀树草原无脊椎动物种子侵扰程度的增加表明,准备燃烧对热带地区这类栖息地的管理和恢复可能作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preparation burning may not improve short-term seed survival in an Amazonian savanna
Abstract The role of fire in the management of degraded areas remains strongly debated. Here we experimentally compare removal and infestation of popcorn kernels (Zea mays L. – Poaceae) and açaí fruits (Euterpe oleracea Mart. – Arecaceae) in one burned and two unburned savanna habitats in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. In each habitat, a total of ten experimental units (five per seed type) were installed, each with three treatments: (1) open access, (2) vertebrate access, and (3) invertebrate access. Generalized linear models showed significant differences in both seed removal (P < 0.0001) and infestation (P < 0.0001) among seed type, habitats and access treatments. Burned savanna had the highest overall seed infestation rate (24.3%) and invertebrate access increased açaí seed infestation levels to 100% in the burned savanna. Increased levels of invertebrate seed infestation in burned savanna suggest that preparation burning may be of limited use for the management and restoration of such habitats in tropical regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信