档案麻烦

IF 0.3 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
P. Sheehan
{"title":"档案麻烦","authors":"P. Sheehan","doi":"10.1163/18757405-03301011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In an era when the possibility of species extinction is more importunate than ever, Beckett’s 1958 play, Endgame, carries a profound sense of immediacy. This article considers the ‘afterlife’ subtended by the play in terms of its post-apocalyptic premise—traditionally, the provenance of the science fiction genre. Using Adorno’s 1961 reading of Endgame, which brushes aside any filiations with “childish science fiction,” the argument pivots on the ‘paring-down’ operations that deprive the drama of most of its resources. Since the latter includes the archivising operations of memory, their breakdown makes the play’s insistent SF allusions both inescapable and radically untenable.","PeriodicalId":53231,"journal":{"name":"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archive Trouble\",\"authors\":\"P. Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18757405-03301011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In an era when the possibility of species extinction is more importunate than ever, Beckett’s 1958 play, Endgame, carries a profound sense of immediacy. This article considers the ‘afterlife’ subtended by the play in terms of its post-apocalyptic premise—traditionally, the provenance of the science fiction genre. Using Adorno’s 1961 reading of Endgame, which brushes aside any filiations with “childish science fiction,” the argument pivots on the ‘paring-down’ operations that deprive the drama of most of its resources. Since the latter includes the archivising operations of memory, their breakdown makes the play’s insistent SF allusions both inescapable and radically untenable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-03301011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-03301011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个物种灭绝的可能性比以往任何时候都更加迫切的时代,贝克特1958年的戏剧《终局之战》(Endgame)给人一种深刻的现实感。本文从后世界末日的前提——传统上,科幻小说类型的起源——来考虑这部剧所包含的“来世”。阿多诺1961年对《终局之战》的解读摒弃了与“幼稚的科幻小说”的任何联系,论点集中在“削减”操作上,这种操作剥夺了戏剧的大部分资源。由于后者包括记忆的存档操作,它们的崩溃使得剧中坚持的科幻典故既不可避免又根本站不住脚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archive Trouble
In an era when the possibility of species extinction is more importunate than ever, Beckett’s 1958 play, Endgame, carries a profound sense of immediacy. This article considers the ‘afterlife’ subtended by the play in terms of its post-apocalyptic premise—traditionally, the provenance of the science fiction genre. Using Adorno’s 1961 reading of Endgame, which brushes aside any filiations with “childish science fiction,” the argument pivots on the ‘paring-down’ operations that deprive the drama of most of its resources. Since the latter includes the archivising operations of memory, their breakdown makes the play’s insistent SF allusions both inescapable and radically untenable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信