G. Bruno, F. Delpino, A. Miragem, Leandro André Vieira Olsson, E. Mello
{"title":"步行和身体活动:一个系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案","authors":"G. Bruno, F. Delpino, A. Miragem, Leandro André Vieira Olsson, E. Mello","doi":"10.12820/rbafs.27e0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appropriate area for walking, related to the flow of walking, on the sidewalks and crossing (walkability) influences the practice of physical activity. However, there is no evidence of meta-analyses that have evaluated this association. Therefore, this study presents a protocol to assess the association between walkability and physical activity. The systematic review protocol was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and will includes a search in the following databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane. It will include observational studies, cross-sectional and longitudinal, that assessed the association between walkability in the neighborhood and physical activity. The process of study selection will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The process will start by reading the titles and abstracts of interest, followed by the full reading of the articles through the Rayyan platform. We will assess the methodological and individual quality across the studies utilizing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Chi-Squared test (I2). To test the influence of variables in the meta-analysis results, we will use, whenever possible, the meta-regression technique. The meta-analysis results will be presented as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval, through a random or fixed-effects model, according to estimate of clinical, statistical, and methodological heterogeneity. If possible, stratifications will be performed according to age group, sex, and physical activity levels. With the expected results, we hope that the knowledge will be useful to encourage the implementation of public policies for walkability in the neighborhood to increase physical activity levels.","PeriodicalId":52945,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Atividade Fisica e Saude","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Walkability and physical activity: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"G. Bruno, F. Delpino, A. Miragem, Leandro André Vieira Olsson, E. Mello\",\"doi\":\"10.12820/rbafs.27e0284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The appropriate area for walking, related to the flow of walking, on the sidewalks and crossing (walkability) influences the practice of physical activity. However, there is no evidence of meta-analyses that have evaluated this association. Therefore, this study presents a protocol to assess the association between walkability and physical activity. The systematic review protocol was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and will includes a search in the following databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane. It will include observational studies, cross-sectional and longitudinal, that assessed the association between walkability in the neighborhood and physical activity. The process of study selection will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The process will start by reading the titles and abstracts of interest, followed by the full reading of the articles through the Rayyan platform. We will assess the methodological and individual quality across the studies utilizing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Chi-Squared test (I2). To test the influence of variables in the meta-analysis results, we will use, whenever possible, the meta-regression technique. The meta-analysis results will be presented as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval, through a random or fixed-effects model, according to estimate of clinical, statistical, and methodological heterogeneity. If possible, stratifications will be performed according to age group, sex, and physical activity levels. With the expected results, we hope that the knowledge will be useful to encourage the implementation of public policies for walkability in the neighborhood to increase physical activity levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Atividade Fisica e Saude\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Atividade Fisica e Saude\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.27e0284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Atividade Fisica e Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.27e0284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人行道和人行横道上适合步行的区域(可步行性)影响身体活动的练习。然而,没有证据表明荟萃分析评估了这种关联。因此,本研究提出了一种评估步行能力和身体活动之间关系的方案。系统评价方案按照PRISMA 2020指南进行,将包括在以下数据库中进行检索:PubMed, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase和Cochrane。它将包括横断面和纵向的观察性研究,以评估社区的步行性和体育活动之间的关系。研究选择的过程将由两位审稿人独立进行。这个过程将从阅读感兴趣的标题和摘要开始,然后通过Rayyan平台完整阅读文章。我们将利用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)和卡方检验(I2)评估研究的方法学和个体质量。为了检验元分析结果中变量的影响,我们将尽可能使用元回归技术。meta分析结果将根据临床、统计学和方法学异质性的估计,通过随机或固定效应模型,以95%置信区间的优势比(OR)呈现。如果可能的话,将根据年龄组、性别和体力活动水平进行分层。有了预期的结果,我们希望这些知识将有助于鼓励公共政策的实施,以提高社区的步行性,增加体育活动水平。
Walkability and physical activity: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
The appropriate area for walking, related to the flow of walking, on the sidewalks and crossing (walkability) influences the practice of physical activity. However, there is no evidence of meta-analyses that have evaluated this association. Therefore, this study presents a protocol to assess the association between walkability and physical activity. The systematic review protocol was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and will includes a search in the following databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane. It will include observational studies, cross-sectional and longitudinal, that assessed the association between walkability in the neighborhood and physical activity. The process of study selection will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The process will start by reading the titles and abstracts of interest, followed by the full reading of the articles through the Rayyan platform. We will assess the methodological and individual quality across the studies utilizing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Chi-Squared test (I2). To test the influence of variables in the meta-analysis results, we will use, whenever possible, the meta-regression technique. The meta-analysis results will be presented as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval, through a random or fixed-effects model, according to estimate of clinical, statistical, and methodological heterogeneity. If possible, stratifications will be performed according to age group, sex, and physical activity levels. With the expected results, we hope that the knowledge will be useful to encourage the implementation of public policies for walkability in the neighborhood to increase physical activity levels.