实施和提供社区辅助医疗方案的优势和挑战:定性反思性专题分析

Q2 Health Professions
Brenda N. Shannon, A. Batt, Georgette Eaton, Matthew Leyenaar, Peter O’Meara, Tomas Barry, C. Lanos, Gary Wingrove, Brett Williams, Michael Nolan, Ray Carney, J. Heffern, K. Bowles
{"title":"实施和提供社区辅助医疗方案的优势和挑战:定性反思性专题分析","authors":"Brenda N. Shannon, A. Batt, Georgette Eaton, Matthew Leyenaar, Peter O’Meara, Tomas Barry, C. Lanos, Gary Wingrove, Brett Williams, Michael Nolan, Ray Carney, J. Heffern, K. Bowles","doi":"10.1177/27536386231188595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study aims to investigate the experiences of individuals involved in implementing and delivering community paramedicine programmes across several different regions internationally, in order to identify key themes that can inform ongoing development and introduction of community paramedicine programmes. Methods In this study, participants were enlisted through convenience sampling and a snowballing method. They responded to a custom survey emphasising open-ended responses. We employed a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis, utilising an inductive coding technique at the semantic/explicit level. This approach allowed us to discern themes from the participants’ accounts of the programme's implementation and delivery, along with their perceptions of its strengths and challenges. Results Data was collected from 29 participants engaged in the development or delivery of community paramedicine programmes spanning seven countries. Five themes were created: (1) community drives the need, which emphasises the importance of community engagement and flexible response to health needs; (2) working with others, which underscores the necessity of collaboration with stakeholders for integration and relationship maintenance; (3) promotion and communication, focusing on clarifying roles and countering misconceptions; (4) recruitment and support of community paramedics, highlighting the significance of experienced paramedic recruitment and providing support for staff retention; and (5) research and evaluation, stressing the importance of data sharing for patient care and programme evaluation. These themes demonstrate the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. Conclusion This study highlights the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. These findings can inform policymakers and practitioners in the development and implementation of community paramedicine programmes, ultimately improving the health and well-being of communities across different regions internationally.","PeriodicalId":55865,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"40 1","pages":"181 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The advantages and challenges experienced with the implementation and delivery of community paramedicine programmes: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Brenda N. Shannon, A. Batt, Georgette Eaton, Matthew Leyenaar, Peter O’Meara, Tomas Barry, C. Lanos, Gary Wingrove, Brett Williams, Michael Nolan, Ray Carney, J. Heffern, K. Bowles\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536386231188595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective This study aims to investigate the experiences of individuals involved in implementing and delivering community paramedicine programmes across several different regions internationally, in order to identify key themes that can inform ongoing development and introduction of community paramedicine programmes. Methods In this study, participants were enlisted through convenience sampling and a snowballing method. They responded to a custom survey emphasising open-ended responses. We employed a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis, utilising an inductive coding technique at the semantic/explicit level. This approach allowed us to discern themes from the participants’ accounts of the programme's implementation and delivery, along with their perceptions of its strengths and challenges. Results Data was collected from 29 participants engaged in the development or delivery of community paramedicine programmes spanning seven countries. Five themes were created: (1) community drives the need, which emphasises the importance of community engagement and flexible response to health needs; (2) working with others, which underscores the necessity of collaboration with stakeholders for integration and relationship maintenance; (3) promotion and communication, focusing on clarifying roles and countering misconceptions; (4) recruitment and support of community paramedics, highlighting the significance of experienced paramedic recruitment and providing support for staff retention; and (5) research and evaluation, stressing the importance of data sharing for patient care and programme evaluation. These themes demonstrate the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. Conclusion This study highlights the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. These findings can inform policymakers and practitioners in the development and implementation of community paramedicine programmes, ultimately improving the health and well-being of communities across different regions internationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231188595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231188595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查国际上几个不同地区参与实施和提供社区辅助医疗项目的个人经验,以确定可以为社区辅助医疗项目的持续发展和引入提供信息的关键主题。方法采用方便抽样法和滚雪球法进行问卷调查。他们回答了一项强调开放式回答的定制调查。我们采用了定性的反身性主题分析,在语义/显式层面利用归纳编码技术。这种方法使我们能够从参与者对方案实施和交付的描述中辨别主题,以及他们对方案优势和挑战的看法。结果从7个国家从事社区辅助医疗项目开发或交付的29名参与者中收集数据。设立了五个主题:(1)社区驱动需求,强调社区参与和灵活应对卫生需求的重要性;(2)与他人合作,这强调了与利益相关者合作以实现整合和关系维护的必要性;(3)宣传和沟通,重点是澄清角色和消除误解;(4)招聘和支持社区护理人员,突出招聘经验丰富的护理人员的重要性,并为员工保留提供支持;(5)研究与评估,强调数据共享对患者护理和规划评估的重要性。这些主题表明了以社区为中心的方法、跨专业实践和社区辅助医学规划评估的重要性。结论本研究强调了以社区为中心的方法、跨专业实践和项目评估在社区辅助医学中的重要性。这些发现可以为决策者和从业人员制定和实施社区辅助医学规划提供信息,最终改善国际不同区域社区的健康和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The advantages and challenges experienced with the implementation and delivery of community paramedicine programmes: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis
Objective This study aims to investigate the experiences of individuals involved in implementing and delivering community paramedicine programmes across several different regions internationally, in order to identify key themes that can inform ongoing development and introduction of community paramedicine programmes. Methods In this study, participants were enlisted through convenience sampling and a snowballing method. They responded to a custom survey emphasising open-ended responses. We employed a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis, utilising an inductive coding technique at the semantic/explicit level. This approach allowed us to discern themes from the participants’ accounts of the programme's implementation and delivery, along with their perceptions of its strengths and challenges. Results Data was collected from 29 participants engaged in the development or delivery of community paramedicine programmes spanning seven countries. Five themes were created: (1) community drives the need, which emphasises the importance of community engagement and flexible response to health needs; (2) working with others, which underscores the necessity of collaboration with stakeholders for integration and relationship maintenance; (3) promotion and communication, focusing on clarifying roles and countering misconceptions; (4) recruitment and support of community paramedics, highlighting the significance of experienced paramedic recruitment and providing support for staff retention; and (5) research and evaluation, stressing the importance of data sharing for patient care and programme evaluation. These themes demonstrate the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. Conclusion This study highlights the significance of community-centred approaches, interprofessional practice, and programme evaluation in community paramedicine. These findings can inform policymakers and practitioners in the development and implementation of community paramedicine programmes, ultimately improving the health and well-being of communities across different regions internationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信