覆盖网络故障检测算法研究

S. Zhuang, Dennis Geels, I. Stoica, R. Katz
{"title":"覆盖网络故障检测算法研究","authors":"S. Zhuang, Dennis Geels, I. Stoica, R. Katz","doi":"10.1109/INFCOM.2005.1498487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key reasons overlay networks are seen as an excellent platform for large scale distributed systems is their resilience in the presence of node failures. This resilience rely on accurate and timely detection of node failures. Despite the prevalent use of keep-alive algorithms in overlay networks to detect node failures, their tradeoffs and the circumstances in which they might best he suited is not well understood. In this paper, we study how the design of various keep-alive approaches affect their performance in node failure detection time, probability of false positive, control overhead, and packet loss rate via analysis, simulation, and implementation. We find that among the class of keep-alive algorithms that share information, the maintenance of backpointer state substantially improves detection time and packet loss rate. The improvement in detection time between baseline and sharing algorithms becomes more pronounced as the size of neighbor set increases. Finally, sharing of information allows a network to tolerate a higher churn rate than baseline.","PeriodicalId":20482,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.","volume":"43 1","pages":"2112-2123 vol. 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"108","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On failure detection algorithms in overlay networks\",\"authors\":\"S. Zhuang, Dennis Geels, I. Stoica, R. Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFCOM.2005.1498487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the key reasons overlay networks are seen as an excellent platform for large scale distributed systems is their resilience in the presence of node failures. This resilience rely on accurate and timely detection of node failures. Despite the prevalent use of keep-alive algorithms in overlay networks to detect node failures, their tradeoffs and the circumstances in which they might best he suited is not well understood. In this paper, we study how the design of various keep-alive approaches affect their performance in node failure detection time, probability of false positive, control overhead, and packet loss rate via analysis, simulation, and implementation. We find that among the class of keep-alive algorithms that share information, the maintenance of backpointer state substantially improves detection time and packet loss rate. The improvement in detection time between baseline and sharing algorithms becomes more pronounced as the size of neighbor set increases. Finally, sharing of information allows a network to tolerate a higher churn rate than baseline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"2112-2123 vol. 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"108\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2005.1498487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2005.1498487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

摘要

覆盖网络被视为大型分布式系统的优秀平台的关键原因之一是它们在节点故障存在时的弹性。这种弹性依赖于对节点故障的准确和及时的检测。尽管在覆盖网络中普遍使用keep-alive算法来检测节点故障,但它们的权衡和它们最适合的环境并没有得到很好的理解。在本文中,我们通过分析、模拟和实现来研究各种保持存活方法的设计如何影响其在节点故障检测时间、误报概率、控制开销和丢包率方面的性能。我们发现在共享信息的一类keep-alive算法中,保持反向指针状态大大提高了检测时间和丢包率。随着邻居集的增加,基线算法和共享算法之间检测时间的改进变得更加明显。最后,信息共享使网络能够容忍比基线更高的流失率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On failure detection algorithms in overlay networks
One of the key reasons overlay networks are seen as an excellent platform for large scale distributed systems is their resilience in the presence of node failures. This resilience rely on accurate and timely detection of node failures. Despite the prevalent use of keep-alive algorithms in overlay networks to detect node failures, their tradeoffs and the circumstances in which they might best he suited is not well understood. In this paper, we study how the design of various keep-alive approaches affect their performance in node failure detection time, probability of false positive, control overhead, and packet loss rate via analysis, simulation, and implementation. We find that among the class of keep-alive algorithms that share information, the maintenance of backpointer state substantially improves detection time and packet loss rate. The improvement in detection time between baseline and sharing algorithms becomes more pronounced as the size of neighbor set increases. Finally, sharing of information allows a network to tolerate a higher churn rate than baseline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信