{"title":"传播、意识形态与权力:有意宣传理论与宣传自发再生产理论之争论注释","authors":"Adrián Tarín Sanz","doi":"10.32870/CYS.V0I32.6794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the debates about modern propaganda began, a question remains unfinished today: the existence, or not, of propaganda in involuntary ideological discourses. In this paper, both currents, here defined as Intentional Propaganda Theory (IPT) and Spontaneous Reproduction of Propaganda Theory (SRPT), are confronted, concluding that the first is based on a restricted vision about power, communication and propaganda.","PeriodicalId":35210,"journal":{"name":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","volume":"94 1","pages":"191-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comunicación, ideología y poder: anotaciones para el debate entre la teoría de la propaganda Intencional y la teoría de la reproducción espontánea de la propaganda\",\"authors\":\"Adrián Tarín Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.32870/CYS.V0I32.6794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the debates about modern propaganda began, a question remains unfinished today: the existence, or not, of propaganda in involuntary ideological discourses. In this paper, both currents, here defined as Intentional Propaganda Theory (IPT) and Spontaneous Reproduction of Propaganda Theory (SRPT), are confronted, concluding that the first is based on a restricted vision about power, communication and propaganda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comunicacion y Sociedad\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"191-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comunicacion y Sociedad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32870/CYS.V0I32.6794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32870/CYS.V0I32.6794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comunicación, ideología y poder: anotaciones para el debate entre la teoría de la propaganda Intencional y la teoría de la reproducción espontánea de la propaganda
Since the debates about modern propaganda began, a question remains unfinished today: the existence, or not, of propaganda in involuntary ideological discourses. In this paper, both currents, here defined as Intentional Propaganda Theory (IPT) and Spontaneous Reproduction of Propaganda Theory (SRPT), are confronted, concluding that the first is based on a restricted vision about power, communication and propaganda.