移动电话应用于非特异性长期腰痛运动的开发和可行性测试

C. Mbada, T. Akintoye, A. Ademoyegun, O. Dada, O. Ayanniyi, A. Odole, IP Gambo, Oe Johnson, FS Olatoye, A. Adejumobi, C. Fatoye, M. Makinde, F. Fatoye
{"title":"移动电话应用于非特异性长期腰痛运动的开发和可行性测试","authors":"C. Mbada, T. Akintoye, A. Ademoyegun, O. Dada, O. Ayanniyi, A. Odole, IP Gambo, Oe Johnson, FS Olatoye, A. Adejumobi, C. Fatoye, M. Makinde, F. Fatoye","doi":"10.23937/2572-3243.1510091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is still lack of rigorous evaluation and evidence for Low-Back Pain (LBP) apps. The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a mobile phone-based app of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) extension exercise; and to examine the correlation between app rating parameters and pain characteristics of patients with non-specific LBP. Methods: A LBP Self-care Mobile-phone App (LBP-SMA) of MDT plus back hygiene was developed following standard iteration and prototyping process. Feasibility of the LBP-SMA was tested in terms of usability, satisfaction and user’s experience using the system usability scale and mobile application rating scale. Quadruple visual analogue scale was used to assess pain intensity of the participants. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics at alpha level set at 0.05. Results: Participants’ mean age and pain intensity was 33.8 ± 8.72 years and 45.3 ± 7.23. On a unified scale of 20, functionality (18.5 ± 1.704) and engagement (17.1 ± 2.963) had highest and least objective quality rating on the LBPSMA. Total objective and subjective quality rating of the app was 17.9 ± 1.471 and 18.4 ± 1.173 respectively. LBP-SMA total impact and usability score was 27.2 ± 1.911 indicating high impact and 29.6 ± 1.95 indicating moderate usability. Participants reported that LBP-SMA mostly affects happiness/wellbeing (37.1%), leads to increased behavioural change (48.6%) and targets physical health (100%). There was no significant correlation between participants’ pain characteristics and app rating parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The LBP-SMA has moderate to high usability, functionality, aesthetics and quality rating, and may serve as an effective mobile-app for self-management of longterm LBP.","PeriodicalId":16374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Feasibility Testing of a Mobile-Phone Application for Exercise in Non-Specific Long-Term Low-Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"C. Mbada, T. Akintoye, A. Ademoyegun, O. Dada, O. Ayanniyi, A. Odole, IP Gambo, Oe Johnson, FS Olatoye, A. Adejumobi, C. Fatoye, M. Makinde, F. Fatoye\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2572-3243.1510091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is still lack of rigorous evaluation and evidence for Low-Back Pain (LBP) apps. The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a mobile phone-based app of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) extension exercise; and to examine the correlation between app rating parameters and pain characteristics of patients with non-specific LBP. Methods: A LBP Self-care Mobile-phone App (LBP-SMA) of MDT plus back hygiene was developed following standard iteration and prototyping process. Feasibility of the LBP-SMA was tested in terms of usability, satisfaction and user’s experience using the system usability scale and mobile application rating scale. Quadruple visual analogue scale was used to assess pain intensity of the participants. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics at alpha level set at 0.05. Results: Participants’ mean age and pain intensity was 33.8 ± 8.72 years and 45.3 ± 7.23. On a unified scale of 20, functionality (18.5 ± 1.704) and engagement (17.1 ± 2.963) had highest and least objective quality rating on the LBPSMA. Total objective and subjective quality rating of the app was 17.9 ± 1.471 and 18.4 ± 1.173 respectively. LBP-SMA total impact and usability score was 27.2 ± 1.911 indicating high impact and 29.6 ± 1.95 indicating moderate usability. Participants reported that LBP-SMA mostly affects happiness/wellbeing (37.1%), leads to increased behavioural change (48.6%) and targets physical health (100%). There was no significant correlation between participants’ pain characteristics and app rating parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The LBP-SMA has moderate to high usability, functionality, aesthetics and quality rating, and may serve as an effective mobile-app for self-management of longterm LBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment\",\"volume\":\"337 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3243.1510091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3243.1510091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:目前对于腰痛(LBP)应用仍缺乏严格的评估和证据。本研究的目的是开发和评估基于手机的机械诊断和治疗(MDT)扩展练习应用程序的可行性;并检验app评分参数与非特异性腰痛患者疼痛特征之间的相关性。方法:采用标准迭代和原型设计方法,开发一款MDT +背部卫生的腰痛自理手机App (LBP- sma)。采用系统可用性量表和移动应用评定量表,从可用性、满意度和用户体验三个方面对LBP-SMA的可行性进行了测试。采用四重视觉模拟量表评估受试者的疼痛强度。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计,alpha水平设置为0.05。结果:参与者的平均年龄为33.8±8.72岁,疼痛强度为45.3±7.23岁。在统一的20分制中,功能性(18.5±1.704)和敬业度(17.1±2.963)在LBPSMA上的客观质量评分最高和最低。应用程序的客观质量评分为17.9±1.471,主观质量评分为18.4±1.173。LBP-SMA总影响和可用性得分为27.2±1.911,表示高影响,29.6±1.95表示中等可用性。参与者报告说,LBP-SMA主要影响快乐/幸福(37.1%),导致行为改变增加(48.6%),并以身体健康为目标(100%)。受试者的疼痛特征与app评分参数之间无显著相关性(p < 0.05)。结论:LBP- sma具有中高的可用性、功能性、美观性和质量评价,可作为长期LBP患者自我管理的有效移动应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Feasibility Testing of a Mobile-Phone Application for Exercise in Non-Specific Long-Term Low-Back Pain
Background: There is still lack of rigorous evaluation and evidence for Low-Back Pain (LBP) apps. The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a mobile phone-based app of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) extension exercise; and to examine the correlation between app rating parameters and pain characteristics of patients with non-specific LBP. Methods: A LBP Self-care Mobile-phone App (LBP-SMA) of MDT plus back hygiene was developed following standard iteration and prototyping process. Feasibility of the LBP-SMA was tested in terms of usability, satisfaction and user’s experience using the system usability scale and mobile application rating scale. Quadruple visual analogue scale was used to assess pain intensity of the participants. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics at alpha level set at 0.05. Results: Participants’ mean age and pain intensity was 33.8 ± 8.72 years and 45.3 ± 7.23. On a unified scale of 20, functionality (18.5 ± 1.704) and engagement (17.1 ± 2.963) had highest and least objective quality rating on the LBPSMA. Total objective and subjective quality rating of the app was 17.9 ± 1.471 and 18.4 ± 1.173 respectively. LBP-SMA total impact and usability score was 27.2 ± 1.911 indicating high impact and 29.6 ± 1.95 indicating moderate usability. Participants reported that LBP-SMA mostly affects happiness/wellbeing (37.1%), leads to increased behavioural change (48.6%) and targets physical health (100%). There was no significant correlation between participants’ pain characteristics and app rating parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The LBP-SMA has moderate to high usability, functionality, aesthetics and quality rating, and may serve as an effective mobile-app for self-management of longterm LBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信