动态光散射和泰勒色散分析中浓度相关扩散系数的理论比较

S. Latunde-Dada
{"title":"动态光散射和泰勒色散分析中浓度相关扩散系数的理论比较","authors":"S. Latunde-Dada","doi":"10.4172/2155-9872.1000340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic Light Scattering and Taylor Dispersion Analysis are two methods employed for the measurement of the \n diffusion coefficients and interaction parameters of solutes. For self-associating solutes, the interaction parameter \n provides a measure for the degree of association and hence the stability of the solutes. Due to the characteristics, \n peculiar to each method, the measured values are weighted averages and are therefore different from the intrinsic or \n unweighted values. In this paper, using a simple model for self-association, theoretical expressions for the DLS, TDA \n and intrinsic diffusion coefficients are derived for self-associating solutes. The corresponding interaction parameters \n are also derived and compared. As expected, at low concentrations, it was found that the DLS gives higher diffusion \n coefficients than TDA and vice versa at high concentrations. More interestingly, points of inflection were found in the \n DLS and TDA diffusion coefficient-concentration curves which imply the presence of minima in measured interaction \n parameters with the TDA minimum occurring at a lower concentration than for DLS. These are absent in the intrinsic \n curves. Furthermore, it was found that whilst the intrinsic interaction parameter tends to a non-zero value in the limit \n of low concentrations, the measured interaction parameters vanish. These trends are important for the interpretation \n of the results obtained from both measurement methods especially when compared to the intrinsic values. With the \n interaction parameter being increasingly used as a measure of stability, consideration of these expected trends could \n prove valuable for explaining experimental data measured at low concentrations. Furthermore, they could prove \n important when comparisons are made between results from the two measurements which are increasingly being \n used as orthogonal methods for protein analysis.","PeriodicalId":14865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical and bioanalytical techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Comparisons of the Concentration-Dependent Diffusion Coefficients from Dynamic Light Scattering and Taylor Dispersion Analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Latunde-Dada\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9872.1000340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamic Light Scattering and Taylor Dispersion Analysis are two methods employed for the measurement of the \\n diffusion coefficients and interaction parameters of solutes. For self-associating solutes, the interaction parameter \\n provides a measure for the degree of association and hence the stability of the solutes. Due to the characteristics, \\n peculiar to each method, the measured values are weighted averages and are therefore different from the intrinsic or \\n unweighted values. In this paper, using a simple model for self-association, theoretical expressions for the DLS, TDA \\n and intrinsic diffusion coefficients are derived for self-associating solutes. The corresponding interaction parameters \\n are also derived and compared. As expected, at low concentrations, it was found that the DLS gives higher diffusion \\n coefficients than TDA and vice versa at high concentrations. More interestingly, points of inflection were found in the \\n DLS and TDA diffusion coefficient-concentration curves which imply the presence of minima in measured interaction \\n parameters with the TDA minimum occurring at a lower concentration than for DLS. These are absent in the intrinsic \\n curves. Furthermore, it was found that whilst the intrinsic interaction parameter tends to a non-zero value in the limit \\n of low concentrations, the measured interaction parameters vanish. These trends are important for the interpretation \\n of the results obtained from both measurement methods especially when compared to the intrinsic values. With the \\n interaction parameter being increasingly used as a measure of stability, consideration of these expected trends could \\n prove valuable for explaining experimental data measured at low concentrations. Furthermore, they could prove \\n important when comparisons are made between results from the two measurements which are increasingly being \\n used as orthogonal methods for protein analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical and bioanalytical techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical and bioanalytical techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9872.1000340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical and bioanalytical techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9872.1000340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

动态光散射和泰勒色散分析是测量溶质扩散系数和相互作用参数的两种方法。对于自缔合溶质,相互作用参数为缔合程度和溶质的稳定性提供了一种度量。由于每种方法特有的特性,测量值是加权平均值,因此与固有值或未加权值不同。本文利用一个简单的自缔合模型,推导了自缔合溶质的DLS、TDA和本征扩散系数的理论表达式。推导并比较了相应的相互作用参数。正如预期的那样,在低浓度下,DLS的扩散系数高于TDA,反之亦然。更有趣的是,在DLS和TDA扩散系数-浓度曲线上发现了拐点,这意味着在测量的相互作用参数中存在最小值,TDA最小值出现在比DLS更低的浓度。这些在固有曲线中是不存在的。此外,本征相互作用参数在低浓度极限下趋于非零值,而实测相互作用参数则消失。这些趋势对于解释从两种测量方法获得的结果非常重要,特别是当与内在值进行比较时。随着相互作用参数被越来越多地用作稳定性的度量,考虑这些预期趋势对于解释在低浓度下测量的实验数据可能是有价值的。此外,当两种测量结果之间进行比较时,它们可能证明是重要的,这两种测量结果越来越多地被用作蛋白质分析的正交方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical Comparisons of the Concentration-Dependent Diffusion Coefficients from Dynamic Light Scattering and Taylor Dispersion Analysis
Dynamic Light Scattering and Taylor Dispersion Analysis are two methods employed for the measurement of the diffusion coefficients and interaction parameters of solutes. For self-associating solutes, the interaction parameter provides a measure for the degree of association and hence the stability of the solutes. Due to the characteristics, peculiar to each method, the measured values are weighted averages and are therefore different from the intrinsic or unweighted values. In this paper, using a simple model for self-association, theoretical expressions for the DLS, TDA and intrinsic diffusion coefficients are derived for self-associating solutes. The corresponding interaction parameters are also derived and compared. As expected, at low concentrations, it was found that the DLS gives higher diffusion coefficients than TDA and vice versa at high concentrations. More interestingly, points of inflection were found in the DLS and TDA diffusion coefficient-concentration curves which imply the presence of minima in measured interaction parameters with the TDA minimum occurring at a lower concentration than for DLS. These are absent in the intrinsic curves. Furthermore, it was found that whilst the intrinsic interaction parameter tends to a non-zero value in the limit of low concentrations, the measured interaction parameters vanish. These trends are important for the interpretation of the results obtained from both measurement methods especially when compared to the intrinsic values. With the interaction parameter being increasingly used as a measure of stability, consideration of these expected trends could prove valuable for explaining experimental data measured at low concentrations. Furthermore, they could prove important when comparisons are made between results from the two measurements which are increasingly being used as orthogonal methods for protein analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信