学科数据管理工作流程的比较分析

S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, A. Lavasa, P. Herterich, L. Rueda, Rachael Kotarski, Elizabeth Newbold
{"title":"学科数据管理工作流程的比较分析","authors":"S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, A. Lavasa, P. Herterich, L. Rueda, Rachael Kotarski, Elizabeth Newbold","doi":"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.","PeriodicalId":92278,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"37 1","pages":"281-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows\",\"authors\":\"S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, A. Lavasa, P. Herterich, L. Rueda, Rachael Kotarski, Elizabeth Newbold\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"281-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数据集现在是学术交流的一个组成部分。其结果是,研究数据现在已经成为图书馆和信息科学的现实,其管理需要专门的工作流程。在这里,我们比较了高能物理和人文社会科学两个学科的例子,它们都引用了OAIS概念模型。尽管我们知道研究数据集及其元数据(准备和管理)在这两个学科中非常不同,但可以看出,概念工作流模型非常相似,包括持久标识符(pid)的分配。在讨论图书馆和信息科学中跨学科服务的设计和实现时,后者特别有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows
Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信