使用VAR(1)和LSTM预测交易稀疏均值回归投资组合

IF 0.3 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Attila Rácz, N. Fogarasi
{"title":"使用VAR(1)和LSTM预测交易稀疏均值回归投资组合","authors":"Attila Rácz, N. Fogarasi","doi":"10.2478/ausi-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigated the predictability of mean reverting portfolios and the VAR(1) model in several aspects. First, we checked the dependency of the accuracy of VAR(1) model on different data types including the original data itself, the return of prices, the natural logarithm of stock and on the log return. Then we compared the accuracy of predictions of mean reverting portfolios coming from VAR(1) with different generative models such as VAR(1) and LSTM for both online and o ine data. It was eventually shown that the LSTM predicts much better than the VAR(1) model. The conclusion is that the VAR(1) assumption works well in selecting the mean reverting portfolio, however, LSTM is a better choice for prediction. With the combined model a strategy with positive trading mean profit was successfully developed. We found that online LSTM outperforms all VAR(1) predictions and results in a positive expected profit when used in a simple trading algorithm.","PeriodicalId":41480,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","volume":"31 1","pages":"288 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trading sparse, mean reverting portfolios using VAR(1) and LSTM prediction\",\"authors\":\"Attila Rácz, N. Fogarasi\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ausi-2021-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We investigated the predictability of mean reverting portfolios and the VAR(1) model in several aspects. First, we checked the dependency of the accuracy of VAR(1) model on different data types including the original data itself, the return of prices, the natural logarithm of stock and on the log return. Then we compared the accuracy of predictions of mean reverting portfolios coming from VAR(1) with different generative models such as VAR(1) and LSTM for both online and o ine data. It was eventually shown that the LSTM predicts much better than the VAR(1) model. The conclusion is that the VAR(1) assumption works well in selecting the mean reverting portfolio, however, LSTM is a better choice for prediction. With the combined model a strategy with positive trading mean profit was successfully developed. We found that online LSTM outperforms all VAR(1) predictions and results in a positive expected profit when used in a simple trading algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"288 - 302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2021-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文从多个方面研究了均值回归投资组合和VAR(1)模型的可预测性。首先,我们检验了VAR(1)模型的准确性对不同数据类型的依赖关系,包括原始数据本身、价格收益、股票的自然对数以及对数收益。然后,我们比较了VAR(1)与不同的生成模型(如VAR(1)和LSTM)对在线和在线数据的均值回归投资组合预测的准确性。最终证明LSTM的预测效果比VAR(1)模型好得多。结论是VAR(1)假设在选择均值回归投资组合时效果较好,而LSTM是一个更好的预测选择。利用组合模型,成功地开发了一种交易平均利润为正的策略。我们发现在线LSTM优于所有VAR(1)预测,并在简单交易算法中使用时产生正的预期利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trading sparse, mean reverting portfolios using VAR(1) and LSTM prediction
Abstract We investigated the predictability of mean reverting portfolios and the VAR(1) model in several aspects. First, we checked the dependency of the accuracy of VAR(1) model on different data types including the original data itself, the return of prices, the natural logarithm of stock and on the log return. Then we compared the accuracy of predictions of mean reverting portfolios coming from VAR(1) with different generative models such as VAR(1) and LSTM for both online and o ine data. It was eventually shown that the LSTM predicts much better than the VAR(1) model. The conclusion is that the VAR(1) assumption works well in selecting the mean reverting portfolio, however, LSTM is a better choice for prediction. With the combined model a strategy with positive trading mean profit was successfully developed. We found that online LSTM outperforms all VAR(1) predictions and results in a positive expected profit when used in a simple trading algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信