玻璃体腔内注射康伯赛普与雷尼单抗治疗湿性老年性黄斑变性的对比观察

Zhan-sheng Shen
{"title":"玻璃体腔内注射康伯赛普与雷尼单抗治疗湿性老年性黄斑变性的对比观察","authors":"Zhan-sheng Shen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the clinical efficacy and safety, and to make the contrast obser-vation by using vitreous cavity injection of Combercept and Ranibizumab to treat wet age-related macular degeneration. \n \n \nMethods \nClinical case control study. From June 2014 to June 2016, 103 patients (103 eyes) with wet AMD were enrolled in the second people's Hospital of Zhengzhou. ETDRS visual acuity chart, color fundus, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to confirm the diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to random number table method, one group for Combercept treatment group (52 cases, 52 eyes) given the vitreous body cavity injection of 10 g/L Combercept of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Combercept); one group for Ranibizumab treatment group (51 cases, 51 eyes) given vitreous body cavity injection of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Ranibizumab). ETDRS visual acuity, macular center concave retinal thickness and choroid neovascularization (CNV) leakage of the two groups before and after treatment were follow-up for 10.65±2.27 months compared. \n \n \nResults \nVitre-ous body injection therapy was 3 to 5 times for either Combercept or Ranibizumab, the average number of treatment was 3.65 times. ETDRS visual acuity compared with before treatment, the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.01) in 103 eyes after treatment at the end of the follow-up examination; The macular center concave retinal thickness was statistical significance between the two groups (P <0.01) compared with before treatment; Combercept treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 28 eyes, reduce leakage 20 eyes, no obvious change in four eyes, Ranibizumab treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 26 eyes, reduce leakage in 22 eyes, 3 eye had no obvious change. The two groups had no obvious statistics significant difference. Follow-up period had no injection and drug related ocular and systemic adverse reactions occur. \n \n \nConclusions \nVitreous cavity injection of Combercept or Ranibizumab for treatment of wet AMD has good curative effect. It can obviously increase the visual acuity, reduce the macular edema, and inhibit leakage of angiogenesis. There is no statistical difference between the two groups. \n \n \nKey words: \nWet AMD; Combercept; Ranibizumab; Intravitreal injection; OCT; FFA","PeriodicalId":10236,"journal":{"name":"中国实用眼科杂志","volume":"169 1","pages":"563-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The contrast observation of the vitreous cavity injection of Combercept or Ranibizumab to treat wet age-related macular degeneration\",\"authors\":\"Zhan-sheng Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the clinical efficacy and safety, and to make the contrast obser-vation by using vitreous cavity injection of Combercept and Ranibizumab to treat wet age-related macular degeneration. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nClinical case control study. From June 2014 to June 2016, 103 patients (103 eyes) with wet AMD were enrolled in the second people's Hospital of Zhengzhou. ETDRS visual acuity chart, color fundus, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to confirm the diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to random number table method, one group for Combercept treatment group (52 cases, 52 eyes) given the vitreous body cavity injection of 10 g/L Combercept of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Combercept); one group for Ranibizumab treatment group (51 cases, 51 eyes) given vitreous body cavity injection of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Ranibizumab). ETDRS visual acuity, macular center concave retinal thickness and choroid neovascularization (CNV) leakage of the two groups before and after treatment were follow-up for 10.65±2.27 months compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nVitre-ous body injection therapy was 3 to 5 times for either Combercept or Ranibizumab, the average number of treatment was 3.65 times. ETDRS visual acuity compared with before treatment, the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.01) in 103 eyes after treatment at the end of the follow-up examination; The macular center concave retinal thickness was statistical significance between the two groups (P <0.01) compared with before treatment; Combercept treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 28 eyes, reduce leakage 20 eyes, no obvious change in four eyes, Ranibizumab treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 26 eyes, reduce leakage in 22 eyes, 3 eye had no obvious change. The two groups had no obvious statistics significant difference. Follow-up period had no injection and drug related ocular and systemic adverse reactions occur. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nVitreous cavity injection of Combercept or Ranibizumab for treatment of wet AMD has good curative effect. It can obviously increase the visual acuity, reduce the macular edema, and inhibit leakage of angiogenesis. There is no statistical difference between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nWet AMD; Combercept; Ranibizumab; Intravitreal injection; OCT; FFA\",\"PeriodicalId\":10236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国实用眼科杂志\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"563-566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国实用眼科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实用眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨康伯西普与雷尼单抗玻璃体腔注射治疗湿性老年性黄斑变性的临床疗效和安全性,并进行对比观察。方法临床病例对照研究。2014年6月至2016年6月,在郑州市第二人民医院纳入湿性黄斑变性患者103例(103眼)。采用ETDRS视力检查、彩色眼底、眼底荧光素血管造影(FFA)及光学相干断层扫描(OCT)证实诊断。按随机数字表法将患者随机分为两组,一组为康伯赛治疗组(52例,52眼)给予玻璃体腔内注射康伯赛10 g/L 0.05 ml(含康伯赛0.5 mg);1组为雷尼单抗治疗组(51例,51眼)给予玻璃体体腔注射0.05 ml(含雷尼单抗0.5 mg)。两组患者治疗前后ETDRS视力、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度及脉络膜新生血管(CNV)渗漏情况随访10.65±2.27个月。结果康伯西普和雷尼单抗玻璃体注射治疗均为3 ~ 5次,平均治疗次数为3.65次。ETDRS视力与治疗前比较,两组治疗后随访检查103只眼,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.01);两组患者黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.01);康伯西普治疗组:黄斑区荧光渗漏停止28眼,减少渗漏20眼,无明显变化4眼;雷尼单抗治疗组:黄斑区荧光渗漏停止26眼,减少渗漏22眼,无明显变化3眼。两组比较差异无明显统计学意义。随访期间未发生与注射及药物相关的眼部及全身不良反应。结论玻璃体腔内注射康伯西普或雷尼单抗治疗湿性AMD疗效良好。能明显提高视力,减轻黄斑水肿,抑制血管生成渗漏。两组间无统计学差异。关键词:湿性AMD;Combercept;之初;Intravitreal注射;10月;FFA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The contrast observation of the vitreous cavity injection of Combercept or Ranibizumab to treat wet age-related macular degeneration
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety, and to make the contrast obser-vation by using vitreous cavity injection of Combercept and Ranibizumab to treat wet age-related macular degeneration. Methods Clinical case control study. From June 2014 to June 2016, 103 patients (103 eyes) with wet AMD were enrolled in the second people's Hospital of Zhengzhou. ETDRS visual acuity chart, color fundus, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to confirm the diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to random number table method, one group for Combercept treatment group (52 cases, 52 eyes) given the vitreous body cavity injection of 10 g/L Combercept of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Combercept); one group for Ranibizumab treatment group (51 cases, 51 eyes) given vitreous body cavity injection of 0.05 ml (0.5 mg containing Ranibizumab). ETDRS visual acuity, macular center concave retinal thickness and choroid neovascularization (CNV) leakage of the two groups before and after treatment were follow-up for 10.65±2.27 months compared. Results Vitre-ous body injection therapy was 3 to 5 times for either Combercept or Ranibizumab, the average number of treatment was 3.65 times. ETDRS visual acuity compared with before treatment, the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.01) in 103 eyes after treatment at the end of the follow-up examination; The macular center concave retinal thickness was statistical significance between the two groups (P <0.01) compared with before treatment; Combercept treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 28 eyes, reduce leakage 20 eyes, no obvious change in four eyes, Ranibizumab treatment group: the macular area fluorescence leakage stopped in 26 eyes, reduce leakage in 22 eyes, 3 eye had no obvious change. The two groups had no obvious statistics significant difference. Follow-up period had no injection and drug related ocular and systemic adverse reactions occur. Conclusions Vitreous cavity injection of Combercept or Ranibizumab for treatment of wet AMD has good curative effect. It can obviously increase the visual acuity, reduce the macular edema, and inhibit leakage of angiogenesis. There is no statistical difference between the two groups. Key words: Wet AMD; Combercept; Ranibizumab; Intravitreal injection; OCT; FFA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9101
期刊介绍: China Practical Ophthalmology was founded in May 1983. It is supervised by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and China Medical University, and publicly distributed at home and abroad. It is a national-level excellent core academic journal of comprehensive ophthalmology and a series of journals of the Chinese Medical Association. China Practical Ophthalmology aims to guide and improve the theoretical level and actual clinical diagnosis and treatment ability of frontline ophthalmologists in my country. It is characterized by close integration with clinical practice, and timely publishes academic articles and scientific research results with high practical value to clinicians, so that readers can understand and use them, improve the theoretical level and diagnosis and treatment ability of ophthalmologists, help and support their innovative development, and is deeply welcomed and loved by ophthalmologists and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信