通过佛罗里达州的家庭保修法规的镜头:索赔,问题和救济

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Chad G. Marzen
{"title":"通过佛罗里达州的家庭保修法规的镜头:索赔,问题和救济","authors":"Chad G. Marzen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2794752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article examines claims, issues and remedies concerning the home warranty industry with a focus on the state of Florida. Florida’s unique example provides insight nationally into varied questions faced by many jurisdictions regarding regulation of home warranty contracts, such as whether a home warranty contract is considered insurance, the effect of arbitral agreements in home warranty contracts and the question of whether a home warranty company can be held liable for bad faith.For the benefit of consumers who choose to obtain a home warranty, this Article concludes that states should recognize bad faith liability for home warranty companies and provide increased protections for consumers from discriminatory, reckless, intentional, and/or malicious denials of valid home warranty claims.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home Warranty Regulation Through the Lens of Florida's Home Warranty Statute: Claims, Issues and Remedies\",\"authors\":\"Chad G. Marzen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2794752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article examines claims, issues and remedies concerning the home warranty industry with a focus on the state of Florida. Florida’s unique example provides insight nationally into varied questions faced by many jurisdictions regarding regulation of home warranty contracts, such as whether a home warranty contract is considered insurance, the effect of arbitral agreements in home warranty contracts and the question of whether a home warranty company can be held liable for bad faith.For the benefit of consumers who choose to obtain a home warranty, this Article concludes that states should recognize bad faith liability for home warranty companies and provide increased protections for consumers from discriminatory, reckless, intentional, and/or malicious denials of valid home warranty claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2794752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2794752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章检查索赔,问题和补救措施有关家庭保修行业的重点是佛罗里达州。佛罗里达州的独特案例提供了全国范围内许多司法管辖区所面临的关于房屋保修合同监管的各种问题的见解,例如房屋保修合同是否被视为保险,房屋保修合同中的仲裁协议的影响以及房屋保修公司是否可以对恶意承担责任的问题。为了让选择购买房屋保修的消费者受益,本文的结论是,各州应承认房屋保修公司的恶意责任,并为消费者提供更多保护,使其免受歧视、鲁莽、故意和/或恶意地拒绝有效的房屋保修索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home Warranty Regulation Through the Lens of Florida's Home Warranty Statute: Claims, Issues and Remedies
This Article examines claims, issues and remedies concerning the home warranty industry with a focus on the state of Florida. Florida’s unique example provides insight nationally into varied questions faced by many jurisdictions regarding regulation of home warranty contracts, such as whether a home warranty contract is considered insurance, the effect of arbitral agreements in home warranty contracts and the question of whether a home warranty company can be held liable for bad faith.For the benefit of consumers who choose to obtain a home warranty, this Article concludes that states should recognize bad faith liability for home warranty companies and provide increased protections for consumers from discriminatory, reckless, intentional, and/or malicious denials of valid home warranty claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信