采用原位CO2捕集的CO2 EOR技术,Neuquina盆地氧燃烧案例研究

Gonzalo Gallo, Raul Puliti, R. Torres, Eleonora Erdmann
{"title":"采用原位CO2捕集的CO2 EOR技术,Neuquina盆地氧燃烧案例研究","authors":"Gonzalo Gallo, Raul Puliti, R. Torres, Eleonora Erdmann","doi":"10.29047/01225383.250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the growing interest in the capture and utilization of CO2 in recent years, several technologies have emerged that seek to generate CO2 in-situ at a low cost. There are promising developments, which allow capturing CO2 with sufficient purity to be used for EOR. Oxycombustion has high potential in the region as this technology benefits from gas production with a high CO2 content, which significantly reduces the cost of capture. Additionally, carbon dioxide separation techniques such as air capture, fuel cells, amines, and membranes are considered. Argentina has several fields, which produce gas with high CO2 content benefiting Oxycombustion economics.   \nThe paradigm change not only occurs in technology but also in the implementation schemes. The vast majority of the development of CO2 EOR are carried out in the USA with very low CO2 costs and high availability. When considering the costs of CO2 per ton (metric ton) that could be obtained in Argentina, and financial variables such as high discount rates, it is clear that the injection model has to be optimized for these conditions. In order to optimize profitability, it is crucial to improve the payout time and the usage of CO2. In one hand, smaller slugs lead to better CO2 utilization rates (oil produced/CO2 injected) while larger slugs lead to faster oil production response. We observed that due to the high discount rates in the area, faster production response has a higher economic impact that sweep efficiency or breakthrough times. It seems to be better to sacrifice overall recovery factor in order to extract oil as soon as possible. Optimal injection schemes where found for different scenarios. Additionally, starting the project early is a key parameter for both technical and economic success.  \n  \nAnother key technical difference is that the available CO2 volume for injection is constant due to the nature of these capture techniques. Unlike purchasing CO2 from a pipeline, where gas can be purchased as needed, Oxycombustion (or other capture methods) produces a continuous stream limiting injection flexibility. All produced CO2 must be injected as it is being produced and, until production gas reaches a CO2 content high enough to assure MMP, CO2 injection stream cannot exceed the maximum CO2 capture capacity. \nCO2 EOR has significant advantages over Chemical EOR due to its significant recovery factors and early response. Additionally, this technology applies to reservoirs of low permeability and / or high temperature where the polymer can have problems of injectivity or degradation. ","PeriodicalId":10745,"journal":{"name":"CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO2 EOR with in-situ CO2 capture, a Neuquina basin oxycombustion case study\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Gallo, Raul Puliti, R. Torres, Eleonora Erdmann\",\"doi\":\"10.29047/01225383.250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the growing interest in the capture and utilization of CO2 in recent years, several technologies have emerged that seek to generate CO2 in-situ at a low cost. There are promising developments, which allow capturing CO2 with sufficient purity to be used for EOR. Oxycombustion has high potential in the region as this technology benefits from gas production with a high CO2 content, which significantly reduces the cost of capture. Additionally, carbon dioxide separation techniques such as air capture, fuel cells, amines, and membranes are considered. Argentina has several fields, which produce gas with high CO2 content benefiting Oxycombustion economics.   \\nThe paradigm change not only occurs in technology but also in the implementation schemes. The vast majority of the development of CO2 EOR are carried out in the USA with very low CO2 costs and high availability. When considering the costs of CO2 per ton (metric ton) that could be obtained in Argentina, and financial variables such as high discount rates, it is clear that the injection model has to be optimized for these conditions. In order to optimize profitability, it is crucial to improve the payout time and the usage of CO2. In one hand, smaller slugs lead to better CO2 utilization rates (oil produced/CO2 injected) while larger slugs lead to faster oil production response. We observed that due to the high discount rates in the area, faster production response has a higher economic impact that sweep efficiency or breakthrough times. It seems to be better to sacrifice overall recovery factor in order to extract oil as soon as possible. Optimal injection schemes where found for different scenarios. Additionally, starting the project early is a key parameter for both technical and economic success.  \\n  \\nAnother key technical difference is that the available CO2 volume for injection is constant due to the nature of these capture techniques. Unlike purchasing CO2 from a pipeline, where gas can be purchased as needed, Oxycombustion (or other capture methods) produces a continuous stream limiting injection flexibility. All produced CO2 must be injected as it is being produced and, until production gas reaches a CO2 content high enough to assure MMP, CO2 injection stream cannot exceed the maximum CO2 capture capacity. \\nCO2 EOR has significant advantages over Chemical EOR due to its significant recovery factors and early response. Additionally, this technology applies to reservoirs of low permeability and / or high temperature where the polymer can have problems of injectivity or degradation. \",\"PeriodicalId\":10745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

鉴于近年来人们对二氧化碳的捕获和利用越来越感兴趣,已经出现了几种寻求以低成本就地产生二氧化碳的技术。有一些很有前景的发展,可以捕获足够纯度的二氧化碳用于提高采收率。氧化燃烧在该地区具有很大的潜力,因为该技术受益于高二氧化碳含量的天然气生产,这大大降低了捕获成本。此外,二氧化碳分离技术,如空气捕获,燃料电池,胺和膜被考虑。阿根廷有几个油田,生产的天然气二氧化碳含量高,有利于氧化燃烧经济。这种范式变化不仅发生在技术上,也发生在实施方案上。绝大多数二氧化碳提高采收率的开发都是在美国进行的,二氧化碳成本非常低,可用性很高。考虑到阿根廷可能获得的每吨二氧化碳(公吨)的成本,以及高贴现率等金融变量,很明显,注入模型必须针对这些条件进行优化。为了优化盈利能力,改善支付时间和二氧化碳的使用是至关重要的。一方面,较小的段塞可以提高CO2的利用率(产油/注入二氧化碳),而较大的段塞可以提高采油速度。我们观察到,由于该地区的高贴现率,更快的生产响应具有更高的经济影响,而不是波及效率或突破时间。为了尽快采油,牺牲整体采收率似乎更好。在不同的情况下找到了最佳的注射方案。此外,尽早启动项目是技术和经济成功的关键参数。另一个关键的技术差异是,由于这些捕获技术的性质,可用的二氧化碳注入量是恒定的。与从管道中购买二氧化碳不同,在管道中可以根据需要购买气体,氧化燃烧(或其他捕获方法)产生连续流限制注入灵活性。所有产出的二氧化碳都必须在生产过程中注入,直到生产气体的二氧化碳含量达到足以保证MMP的水平,二氧化碳注入流不能超过最大二氧化碳捕获能力。CO2提高采收率具有显著的采收率和较早的响应能力,明显优于化学提高采收率。此外,该技术适用于低渗透和/或高温油藏,在这些油藏中聚合物可能存在注入性或降解问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CO2 EOR with in-situ CO2 capture, a Neuquina basin oxycombustion case study
Given the growing interest in the capture and utilization of CO2 in recent years, several technologies have emerged that seek to generate CO2 in-situ at a low cost. There are promising developments, which allow capturing CO2 with sufficient purity to be used for EOR. Oxycombustion has high potential in the region as this technology benefits from gas production with a high CO2 content, which significantly reduces the cost of capture. Additionally, carbon dioxide separation techniques such as air capture, fuel cells, amines, and membranes are considered. Argentina has several fields, which produce gas with high CO2 content benefiting Oxycombustion economics.   The paradigm change not only occurs in technology but also in the implementation schemes. The vast majority of the development of CO2 EOR are carried out in the USA with very low CO2 costs and high availability. When considering the costs of CO2 per ton (metric ton) that could be obtained in Argentina, and financial variables such as high discount rates, it is clear that the injection model has to be optimized for these conditions. In order to optimize profitability, it is crucial to improve the payout time and the usage of CO2. In one hand, smaller slugs lead to better CO2 utilization rates (oil produced/CO2 injected) while larger slugs lead to faster oil production response. We observed that due to the high discount rates in the area, faster production response has a higher economic impact that sweep efficiency or breakthrough times. It seems to be better to sacrifice overall recovery factor in order to extract oil as soon as possible. Optimal injection schemes where found for different scenarios. Additionally, starting the project early is a key parameter for both technical and economic success.    Another key technical difference is that the available CO2 volume for injection is constant due to the nature of these capture techniques. Unlike purchasing CO2 from a pipeline, where gas can be purchased as needed, Oxycombustion (or other capture methods) produces a continuous stream limiting injection flexibility. All produced CO2 must be injected as it is being produced and, until production gas reaches a CO2 content high enough to assure MMP, CO2 injection stream cannot exceed the maximum CO2 capture capacity. CO2 EOR has significant advantages over Chemical EOR due to its significant recovery factors and early response. Additionally, this technology applies to reservoirs of low permeability and / or high temperature where the polymer can have problems of injectivity or degradation. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信