吸入器技术在COPD和哮喘患者中的应用评价

Mohammed Hussein Abdulredha, Haydar Jawad Aljobouri, Mohammed Dhamin Alareedh
{"title":"吸入器技术在COPD和哮喘患者中的应用评价","authors":"Mohammed Hussein Abdulredha, Haydar Jawad Aljobouri, Mohammed Dhamin Alareedh","doi":"10.36330/kmj.v19i1.12014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asthma and COPD remain poorly controlled diseases that significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Inhalers are the main therapeutic options. Poor inhaler technique is a major factor that leads to poor clinical consequences, affecting the effectiveness of treatment and further control of symptoms. Aim of the Study: the present study aims at evaluating the inhaler technique and its clinical consequence in COPD and asthma patients .Patients and Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 70 patients, 35 with COPD and 35 with Asthma, who are already on inhaler drugs in their treatment. The use of inhaler was evaluated by a checklist that contains seven steps of inhaler use; by asking the patients to use their inhalers as usual, the correct or incorrect steps were recorded. The result of each patient checklist was correlated with the patient demographic parameters and level of control of his disease (COPD or asthma) by using COPD assessment test (CAT) or asthma control test (ACT) respectively. The Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study; 35 had COPD and 35 were asthmatic. The COPD patients were significantly older than asthmatic, mean age was 65.5 ± 5.8 (range: 55 – 75) years and 36.4 ± 13.9 (range: 16 – 65) years, respectively. (P. value < 0.05).  Males were dominant among COPD patients than asthmatic group; they contribute to 80% and 45.7%, respectively,(P. value < 0.05). The level of education was not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Current smokers were significantly more frequent in COPD group than in asthmatic group, 40% vs. 14.3%, respectively.  The duration of inhaler use was significantly longer in asthmatics than in the COPD group members; the mean duration of use was 5.2 ± 4.5 (range: 1 – 20) years in asthmatic compared to 2.4 ± 1.1 (range: 1 – 6) years in COPD group. Dry powder inhalers (DPI) were relatively more frequently used than metered dose inhalers (MDI) where DPI used by 51.4% and 54.3% in COPD and asthmatic group, respectively. The level of education of patients and longer duration of inhaler use correlate positively with good technique, while no significant correlation with other variables. Conclusion: A large proportion of the participants had a poor inhaler technique regardless of the type of disease and of inhaler (DPI or MDI). There was a positive correlation between proper use of inhaler and high educational level of patients and longer duration of use.","PeriodicalId":17869,"journal":{"name":"Kufa Journal For Veterinary Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Inhaler Technique In COPD And Asthma Patients\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Hussein Abdulredha, Haydar Jawad Aljobouri, Mohammed Dhamin Alareedh\",\"doi\":\"10.36330/kmj.v19i1.12014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Asthma and COPD remain poorly controlled diseases that significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Inhalers are the main therapeutic options. Poor inhaler technique is a major factor that leads to poor clinical consequences, affecting the effectiveness of treatment and further control of symptoms. Aim of the Study: the present study aims at evaluating the inhaler technique and its clinical consequence in COPD and asthma patients .Patients and Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 70 patients, 35 with COPD and 35 with Asthma, who are already on inhaler drugs in their treatment. The use of inhaler was evaluated by a checklist that contains seven steps of inhaler use; by asking the patients to use their inhalers as usual, the correct or incorrect steps were recorded. The result of each patient checklist was correlated with the patient demographic parameters and level of control of his disease (COPD or asthma) by using COPD assessment test (CAT) or asthma control test (ACT) respectively. The Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study; 35 had COPD and 35 were asthmatic. The COPD patients were significantly older than asthmatic, mean age was 65.5 ± 5.8 (range: 55 – 75) years and 36.4 ± 13.9 (range: 16 – 65) years, respectively. (P. value < 0.05).  Males were dominant among COPD patients than asthmatic group; they contribute to 80% and 45.7%, respectively,(P. value < 0.05). The level of education was not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Current smokers were significantly more frequent in COPD group than in asthmatic group, 40% vs. 14.3%, respectively.  The duration of inhaler use was significantly longer in asthmatics than in the COPD group members; the mean duration of use was 5.2 ± 4.5 (range: 1 – 20) years in asthmatic compared to 2.4 ± 1.1 (range: 1 – 6) years in COPD group. Dry powder inhalers (DPI) were relatively more frequently used than metered dose inhalers (MDI) where DPI used by 51.4% and 54.3% in COPD and asthmatic group, respectively. The level of education of patients and longer duration of inhaler use correlate positively with good technique, while no significant correlation with other variables. Conclusion: A large proportion of the participants had a poor inhaler technique regardless of the type of disease and of inhaler (DPI or MDI). There was a positive correlation between proper use of inhaler and high educational level of patients and longer duration of use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kufa Journal For Veterinary Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kufa Journal For Veterinary Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36330/kmj.v19i1.12014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kufa Journal For Veterinary Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36330/kmj.v19i1.12014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病仍然是控制不良的疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。吸入器是主要的治疗选择。不良的吸入器技术是导致不良临床后果、影响治疗效果和进一步控制症状的主要因素。研究目的:本研究旨在评估吸入器技术及其在慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘患者中的临床效果。患者和方法:这是一项横断面研究,70例患者,35例慢性阻塞性肺病和35例哮喘,已经在治疗中使用吸入器药物。通过包含吸入器使用七个步骤的清单对吸入器的使用进行评估;通过要求患者像往常一样使用吸入器,记录正确或不正确的步骤。通过COPD评估试验(CAT)或哮喘控制试验(ACT)分别将各患者检查表的结果与患者人口学参数及疾病(COPD或哮喘)控制水平进行相关性分析。结果:本研究共纳入70例患者;35人患有慢性阻塞性肺病,35人患有哮喘。COPD患者年龄明显大于哮喘患者,平均年龄分别为65.5±5.8岁(55 ~ 75岁)和36.4±13.9岁(16 ~ 65岁)。(p < 0.05)。慢性阻塞性肺病患者中男性多于哮喘组;它们分别贡献了80%和45.7%。值< 0.05)。各组受教育程度差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。慢性阻塞性肺病组吸烟者明显多于哮喘组,分别为40%和14.3%。哮喘患者使用吸入器的时间明显长于COPD组;哮喘组的平均使用时间为5.2±4.5(范围:1 - 20)年,COPD组为2.4±1.1(范围:1 - 6)年。干粉吸入器(DPI)的使用频率相对高于计量吸入器(MDI), COPD组和哮喘组DPI的使用频率分别为51.4%和54.3%。患者的受教育程度和较长的吸入器使用时间与良好的技术呈正相关,而与其他变量无显著相关。结论:无论疾病类型和吸入器(DPI或MDI),很大一部分参与者的吸入器技术都很差。吸入器的正确使用与患者文化程度高、使用时间长呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Inhaler Technique In COPD And Asthma Patients
Background: Asthma and COPD remain poorly controlled diseases that significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Inhalers are the main therapeutic options. Poor inhaler technique is a major factor that leads to poor clinical consequences, affecting the effectiveness of treatment and further control of symptoms. Aim of the Study: the present study aims at evaluating the inhaler technique and its clinical consequence in COPD and asthma patients .Patients and Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 70 patients, 35 with COPD and 35 with Asthma, who are already on inhaler drugs in their treatment. The use of inhaler was evaluated by a checklist that contains seven steps of inhaler use; by asking the patients to use their inhalers as usual, the correct or incorrect steps were recorded. The result of each patient checklist was correlated with the patient demographic parameters and level of control of his disease (COPD or asthma) by using COPD assessment test (CAT) or asthma control test (ACT) respectively. The Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in this study; 35 had COPD and 35 were asthmatic. The COPD patients were significantly older than asthmatic, mean age was 65.5 ± 5.8 (range: 55 – 75) years and 36.4 ± 13.9 (range: 16 – 65) years, respectively. (P. value < 0.05).  Males were dominant among COPD patients than asthmatic group; they contribute to 80% and 45.7%, respectively,(P. value < 0.05). The level of education was not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Current smokers were significantly more frequent in COPD group than in asthmatic group, 40% vs. 14.3%, respectively.  The duration of inhaler use was significantly longer in asthmatics than in the COPD group members; the mean duration of use was 5.2 ± 4.5 (range: 1 – 20) years in asthmatic compared to 2.4 ± 1.1 (range: 1 – 6) years in COPD group. Dry powder inhalers (DPI) were relatively more frequently used than metered dose inhalers (MDI) where DPI used by 51.4% and 54.3% in COPD and asthmatic group, respectively. The level of education of patients and longer duration of inhaler use correlate positively with good technique, while no significant correlation with other variables. Conclusion: A large proportion of the participants had a poor inhaler technique regardless of the type of disease and of inhaler (DPI or MDI). There was a positive correlation between proper use of inhaler and high educational level of patients and longer duration of use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信