阅读Heupers:巫术文本。八年口头访谈分析

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
W. de Blécourt
{"title":"阅读Heupers:巫术文本。八年口头访谈分析","authors":"W. de Blécourt","doi":"10.1080/0015587X.2022.2154502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Engelbert Heupers’s ‘folktales’, collected in the 1960s, form the second largest collection in the Netherlands. Although they relate to ‘superstition’, they should be regarded as fragments of oral history, albeit on legendary subjects, rather than legends, or even memorates. They were told as genuine memories. Especially the witchcraft texts, analysed here, referred to past events and some were corroborated by newspaper reports. Heupers’s work suffered from his supervisor’s lack of knowledge of or interest in legends. The reminiscences were influenced by press reports on witchcraft which persuaded some people to remain silent or only divulge commonplace information about the subject. There was a striking difference between Roman Catholic and Reformed Protestant interviewees. Local witchcraft texts need to be understood as a patchwork of stories which sometimes enabled the identification of a witch and a reconstruction of historical events.","PeriodicalId":45773,"journal":{"name":"FOLKLORE","volume":"37 1","pages":"91 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Heupers: The Witchcraft Texts. An Analysis of Eight Years of Oral Interviews\",\"authors\":\"W. de Blécourt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0015587X.2022.2154502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Engelbert Heupers’s ‘folktales’, collected in the 1960s, form the second largest collection in the Netherlands. Although they relate to ‘superstition’, they should be regarded as fragments of oral history, albeit on legendary subjects, rather than legends, or even memorates. They were told as genuine memories. Especially the witchcraft texts, analysed here, referred to past events and some were corroborated by newspaper reports. Heupers’s work suffered from his supervisor’s lack of knowledge of or interest in legends. The reminiscences were influenced by press reports on witchcraft which persuaded some people to remain silent or only divulge commonplace information about the subject. There was a striking difference between Roman Catholic and Reformed Protestant interviewees. Local witchcraft texts need to be understood as a patchwork of stories which sometimes enabled the identification of a witch and a reconstruction of historical events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2022.2154502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2022.2154502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Engelbert Heupers的“民间故事”,收集于20世纪60年代,是荷兰第二大收藏。尽管它们与“迷信”有关,但它们应该被视为口述历史的片段,尽管是关于传奇题材的,而不是传说,甚至不是记忆。这些都是真实的回忆。尤其是巫术文本,在这里分析,提到过去的事件,有些是由报纸报道证实。由于他的导师对传说缺乏知识和兴趣,Heupers的工作受到了影响。这些回忆受到媒体对巫术的报道的影响,这些报道说服一些人保持沉默,或者只透露有关巫术的普通信息。罗马天主教徒和改革宗新教的受访者之间存在显著差异。当地的巫术文本需要被理解为故事的拼凑,有时可以识别女巫和重建历史事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Heupers: The Witchcraft Texts. An Analysis of Eight Years of Oral Interviews
Abstract Engelbert Heupers’s ‘folktales’, collected in the 1960s, form the second largest collection in the Netherlands. Although they relate to ‘superstition’, they should be regarded as fragments of oral history, albeit on legendary subjects, rather than legends, or even memorates. They were told as genuine memories. Especially the witchcraft texts, analysed here, referred to past events and some were corroborated by newspaper reports. Heupers’s work suffered from his supervisor’s lack of knowledge of or interest in legends. The reminiscences were influenced by press reports on witchcraft which persuaded some people to remain silent or only divulge commonplace information about the subject. There was a striking difference between Roman Catholic and Reformed Protestant interviewees. Local witchcraft texts need to be understood as a patchwork of stories which sometimes enabled the identification of a witch and a reconstruction of historical events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FOLKLORE
FOLKLORE FOLKLORE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: A fully peer-reviewed international journal of folklore and folkloristics. Folklore is one of the earliest journals in the field of folkloristics, first published as The Folk-Lore Record in 1878. Folklore publishes ethnographical and analytical essays on vernacular culture worldwide, specializing in traditional narrative, language, music, song, dance, drama, foodways, medicine, arts and crafts, popular religion, and belief. It reviews current studies in a wide range of adjacent disciplines including anthropology, cultural studies, ethnology, history, literature, and religion. Folklore prides itself on its special mix of reviews, analysis, ethnography, and debate; its combination of European and North American approaches to the study of folklore; and its coverage not only of the materials and processes of folklore, but also of the history, methods, and theory of folkloristics. Folklore aims to be lively, informative and accessible, while maintaining high standards of scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信