公司专家对评估复杂评估的见解

A. Eilifsen, K. Kjellevold, William F. Messier, Jr.
{"title":"公司专家对评估复杂评估的见解","authors":"A. Eilifsen, K. Kjellevold, William F. Messier, Jr.","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how company experts and their interactions with management and the auditor affect the fair value measurement (FVM) process. We conduct detailed interviews with 19 Norwegian company experts who possess expertise in financial instruments, investment property, oil & gas reserves, and shipping and 8 audit partners with extensive valuation experience to investigate theoretical predictions derived from agency theory and the monitoring role of company experts. Overall, the results support our predictions. Company experts: (1) have incentives to build and maintain their reputation, (2) face management pressure, and management uses several tactics (i.e., reappointment and multiple company experts) to influence their FVM, (3) are aware that providing multiple services (e.g., brokerage and trading) can affect their FVM but believe that there are adequate safeguards in place, and (4) differ by type of expert in allowing auditor access to their models and data. We also find variation by type of company experts' interaction with the audit team and their perceptions of the audit teams’ narrow focus on individual model assumptions. These findings inform researchers, regulators, and practitioners about the role company experts play in the FVM process.","PeriodicalId":12319,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accounting eJournal","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from Company Experts in Valuing Complex Estimates\",\"authors\":\"A. Eilifsen, K. Kjellevold, William F. Messier, Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines how company experts and their interactions with management and the auditor affect the fair value measurement (FVM) process. We conduct detailed interviews with 19 Norwegian company experts who possess expertise in financial instruments, investment property, oil & gas reserves, and shipping and 8 audit partners with extensive valuation experience to investigate theoretical predictions derived from agency theory and the monitoring role of company experts. Overall, the results support our predictions. Company experts: (1) have incentives to build and maintain their reputation, (2) face management pressure, and management uses several tactics (i.e., reappointment and multiple company experts) to influence their FVM, (3) are aware that providing multiple services (e.g., brokerage and trading) can affect their FVM but believe that there are adequate safeguards in place, and (4) differ by type of expert in allowing auditor access to their models and data. We also find variation by type of company experts' interaction with the audit team and their perceptions of the audit teams’ narrow focus on individual model assumptions. These findings inform researchers, regulators, and practitioners about the role company experts play in the FVM process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨公司专家及其与管理层和审计师的互动如何影响公允价值计量(FVM)过程。我们对19位挪威公司专家进行了详细的采访,他们在金融工具、投资房地产、石油和amp;天然气储量,航运和8名具有丰富估值经验的审计合作伙伴,调查来自代理理论的理论预测和公司专家的监督作用。总的来说,结果支持我们的预测。公司专家:(1)有建立和维护其声誉的动机,(2)面临管理压力,管理层使用多种策略(即重新任命和多名公司专家)来影响其FVM,(3)意识到提供多种服务(例如,经纪和交易)会影响其FVM,但相信有足够的保障措施,(4)不同类型的专家允许审计师访问其模型和数据。我们还发现,根据公司专家与审计团队的互动类型以及他们对审计团队狭隘地关注单个模型假设的看法,存在差异。这些发现让研究人员、监管机构和从业者了解了公司专家在FVM过程中所扮演的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from Company Experts in Valuing Complex Estimates
This study examines how company experts and their interactions with management and the auditor affect the fair value measurement (FVM) process. We conduct detailed interviews with 19 Norwegian company experts who possess expertise in financial instruments, investment property, oil & gas reserves, and shipping and 8 audit partners with extensive valuation experience to investigate theoretical predictions derived from agency theory and the monitoring role of company experts. Overall, the results support our predictions. Company experts: (1) have incentives to build and maintain their reputation, (2) face management pressure, and management uses several tactics (i.e., reappointment and multiple company experts) to influence their FVM, (3) are aware that providing multiple services (e.g., brokerage and trading) can affect their FVM but believe that there are adequate safeguards in place, and (4) differ by type of expert in allowing auditor access to their models and data. We also find variation by type of company experts' interaction with the audit team and their perceptions of the audit teams’ narrow focus on individual model assumptions. These findings inform researchers, regulators, and practitioners about the role company experts play in the FVM process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信