不同生命周期储蓄策略和失业对斯洛伐克固定缴款养恤金计划个人储蓄的影响

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Michal Mešťan, I. Králik, Leoš Šafár, J. Šebo
{"title":"不同生命周期储蓄策略和失业对斯洛伐克固定缴款养恤金计划个人储蓄的影响","authors":"Michal Mešťan, I. Králik, Leoš Šafár, J. Šebo","doi":"10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Searching for the optimal saving strategy is often tied with the life-cycle strategies where only the age of a saver is considered for setting the allocation profile between equities and bonds. Our article contributes to the debate by looking at the performance and adequacy risks arising from applying age-based saving strategies for savers in funded pension schemes. As many studies have proven the shift of the risk onto savers in defined contribution pension schemes under various saving strategies, we contribute to the debate by providing simulations of expected accumulated savings via funded pension scheme under the various life-cycle income profiles and existence of unemployment risk. Using the resampling simulation technique, we compare the fixed and age-based strategies of three different agents with various life-cycle income paths and different unemployment risk. We compare the expected amount of savings and calculate relative indicators comparing the expected monthly benefits, income replacement rate. We look closely on the impact of unemployment on the value of savings and calculate the unemployment factor explaining the value of savings lost due to the periods of unemployment. By combining life-cycle income functions of individuals with different education level and unemployment risk, we show that decisions of implementing low risk saving strategies are suboptimal and lead to a substantial decrease in replacement ratios not only for higher income cohorts but especially for the lowest ones. At the same time, we prove that employing low risk saving strategy leads to the increase of adequacy risk especially driven by the unemployment risk that is higher for lower education individuals. We conclude that age-based life-cycle saving strategies, where the remaining saving horizon is the only factor defining the allocation profile is not the optimal saving strategy and other factors should be considered as well when searching for optimal saving strategy.","PeriodicalId":46351,"journal":{"name":"E & M Ekonomie a Management","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPACT OF DIFFERENT LIFE-CYCLE SAVING STRATEGIES AND UNEMPLOYMENT ON INDIVIDUAL SAVINGS IN DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION SCHEME IN SLOVAKIA\",\"authors\":\"Michal Mešťan, I. Králik, Leoš Šafár, J. Šebo\",\"doi\":\"10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Searching for the optimal saving strategy is often tied with the life-cycle strategies where only the age of a saver is considered for setting the allocation profile between equities and bonds. Our article contributes to the debate by looking at the performance and adequacy risks arising from applying age-based saving strategies for savers in funded pension schemes. As many studies have proven the shift of the risk onto savers in defined contribution pension schemes under various saving strategies, we contribute to the debate by providing simulations of expected accumulated savings via funded pension scheme under the various life-cycle income profiles and existence of unemployment risk. Using the resampling simulation technique, we compare the fixed and age-based strategies of three different agents with various life-cycle income paths and different unemployment risk. We compare the expected amount of savings and calculate relative indicators comparing the expected monthly benefits, income replacement rate. We look closely on the impact of unemployment on the value of savings and calculate the unemployment factor explaining the value of savings lost due to the periods of unemployment. By combining life-cycle income functions of individuals with different education level and unemployment risk, we show that decisions of implementing low risk saving strategies are suboptimal and lead to a substantial decrease in replacement ratios not only for higher income cohorts but especially for the lowest ones. At the same time, we prove that employing low risk saving strategy leads to the increase of adequacy risk especially driven by the unemployment risk that is higher for lower education individuals. We conclude that age-based life-cycle saving strategies, where the remaining saving horizon is the only factor defining the allocation profile is not the optimal saving strategy and other factors should be considered as well when searching for optimal saving strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E & M Ekonomie a Management\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E & M Ekonomie a Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E & M Ekonomie a Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寻找最优储蓄策略通常与生命周期策略联系在一起,在生命周期策略中,在设定股票和债券之间的配置配置时,只考虑储蓄者的年龄。我们的文章通过研究在基金养老金计划中对储户应用基于年龄的储蓄策略所产生的表现和充足性风险,为这场辩论做出了贡献。由于许多研究已经证明,在各种储蓄策略下,固定缴款养老金计划的风险转移到了储蓄者身上,我们通过提供在各种生命周期收入概况和存在失业风险的情况下,通过基金养老金计划的预期累积储蓄的模拟,为辩论做出贡献。利用重抽样模拟技术,我们比较了三种具有不同生命周期收入路径和不同失业风险的不同代理人的固定和基于年龄的策略。我们比较预期的储蓄金额,并计算相对指标,比较预期的每月福利,收入替代率。我们密切关注失业对储蓄价值的影响,并计算失业因子,解释由于失业期间损失的储蓄价值。通过结合不同教育水平和失业风险个体的生命周期收入函数,我们发现实施低风险储蓄策略的决策是次优的,并且不仅导致高收入人群的替代率大幅下降,而且导致最低收入人群的替代率大幅下降。同时,我们证明了采用低风险储蓄策略会导致充足性风险的增加,特别是在低学历个体失业风险的驱动下。结果表明,以剩余储蓄水平为唯一决定配置剖面的基于年龄的生命周期储蓄策略不是最优储蓄策略,在寻找最优储蓄策略时应考虑其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPACT OF DIFFERENT LIFE-CYCLE SAVING STRATEGIES AND UNEMPLOYMENT ON INDIVIDUAL SAVINGS IN DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION SCHEME IN SLOVAKIA
Searching for the optimal saving strategy is often tied with the life-cycle strategies where only the age of a saver is considered for setting the allocation profile between equities and bonds. Our article contributes to the debate by looking at the performance and adequacy risks arising from applying age-based saving strategies for savers in funded pension schemes. As many studies have proven the shift of the risk onto savers in defined contribution pension schemes under various saving strategies, we contribute to the debate by providing simulations of expected accumulated savings via funded pension scheme under the various life-cycle income profiles and existence of unemployment risk. Using the resampling simulation technique, we compare the fixed and age-based strategies of three different agents with various life-cycle income paths and different unemployment risk. We compare the expected amount of savings and calculate relative indicators comparing the expected monthly benefits, income replacement rate. We look closely on the impact of unemployment on the value of savings and calculate the unemployment factor explaining the value of savings lost due to the periods of unemployment. By combining life-cycle income functions of individuals with different education level and unemployment risk, we show that decisions of implementing low risk saving strategies are suboptimal and lead to a substantial decrease in replacement ratios not only for higher income cohorts but especially for the lowest ones. At the same time, we prove that employing low risk saving strategy leads to the increase of adequacy risk especially driven by the unemployment risk that is higher for lower education individuals. We conclude that age-based life-cycle saving strategies, where the remaining saving horizon is the only factor defining the allocation profile is not the optimal saving strategy and other factors should be considered as well when searching for optimal saving strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信