脑肿瘤患者的预先护理计划:一项前瞻性队列研究

K. Song, B. Amatya, F. Khan
{"title":"脑肿瘤患者的预先护理计划:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"K. Song, B. Amatya, F. Khan","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2015-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess and understand the awareness and experience of brain tumour (BT) patients in discussing Advance Care Planning (ACP), to identify main symptoms experienced, physical and functional status perceived quality of life, and level of coping. Methods: A prospective cohort study with an initial open-ended questionnaire followed by semi-structured interview questions regarding ACP with 18 patients diagnosed with BT (WHO Grade I-IV, metastatic BT) in hospital and community. Standardized assessments measured coping strategies, and quality of life (QoL). Interview transcripts regarding ACP discussions were analyzed, coded and interpreted using qualitative analytic techniques for thematic analyses. Results: Participants' mean age was 51 years (range 22-65 years), female (61%); median time since BT diagnosis was 1.5 years and just over half (56%) had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Fatigue was the most common symptom reported by 83% of participants. Overall, participants indicated good QoL and used more problem-focused coping strategies including ‘acceptance’ and ‘positive reframing’. Thematic analyses indicated that participants had limited awareness and understanding of ACP, variable views on appropriate timing of ACP discussions and change of decisions over illness trajectory. Most felt able to discuss ACP and preferred dedicated sessions by a trained health professional. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of providing timely information regarding ACP to BT patients during the course of their disease. Established ACP discussions have an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and to guide delivery of end-of-life care. The demonstrated low uptake of ACP in this pilot study shows need for improved awareness in clinical practice for timely ACP discussions and multifaceted interventions system-wide in implementing ACP.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"58 1","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advance care planning in patients with brain tumours: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"K. Song, B. Amatya, F. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.14312/2052-4994.2015-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To assess and understand the awareness and experience of brain tumour (BT) patients in discussing Advance Care Planning (ACP), to identify main symptoms experienced, physical and functional status perceived quality of life, and level of coping. Methods: A prospective cohort study with an initial open-ended questionnaire followed by semi-structured interview questions regarding ACP with 18 patients diagnosed with BT (WHO Grade I-IV, metastatic BT) in hospital and community. Standardized assessments measured coping strategies, and quality of life (QoL). Interview transcripts regarding ACP discussions were analyzed, coded and interpreted using qualitative analytic techniques for thematic analyses. Results: Participants' mean age was 51 years (range 22-65 years), female (61%); median time since BT diagnosis was 1.5 years and just over half (56%) had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Fatigue was the most common symptom reported by 83% of participants. Overall, participants indicated good QoL and used more problem-focused coping strategies including ‘acceptance’ and ‘positive reframing’. Thematic analyses indicated that participants had limited awareness and understanding of ACP, variable views on appropriate timing of ACP discussions and change of decisions over illness trajectory. Most felt able to discuss ACP and preferred dedicated sessions by a trained health professional. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of providing timely information regarding ACP to BT patients during the course of their disease. Established ACP discussions have an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and to guide delivery of end-of-life care. The demonstrated low uptake of ACP in this pilot study shows need for improved awareness in clinical practice for timely ACP discussions and multifaceted interventions system-wide in implementing ACP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"85-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2015-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2015-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:评估和了解脑肿瘤(BT)患者在讨论预先护理计划(ACP)时的意识和体验,确定经历的主要症状、身体和功能状态、感知的生活质量和应对水平。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究,对18名医院和社区诊断为BT (WHO I-IV级,转移性BT)的患者进行初步开放式问卷调查,然后进行半结构化访谈问题。标准化评估衡量应对策略和生活质量(QoL)。关于非加太会议讨论的访谈笔录进行了分析、编码和解释,使用定性分析技术进行专题分析。结果:参与者平均年龄51岁(22-65岁),女性占61%;BT诊断的中位时间为1.5年,超过一半(56%)患有多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)。83%的参与者报告疲劳是最常见的症状。总体而言,参与者表现出良好的生活质量,并使用了更多以问题为中心的应对策略,包括“接受”和“积极重构”。专题分析表明,与会者对ACP的认识和理解有限,对ACP讨论的适当时机的看法不一,对疾病轨迹的决定也有所改变。大多数人认为能够讨论非加太问题,并希望由训练有素的卫生专业人员举行专门会议。结论:本研究强调了在BT患者病程中及时提供ACP信息的重要性。已建立的ACP讨论在增强患者自主性和指导临终关怀交付方面具有重要作用。在这项试点研究中,ACP的使用率较低,这表明临床实践中需要提高对ACP的认识,以便及时讨论ACP,并在全系统实施ACP时进行多方面的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advance care planning in patients with brain tumours: A prospective cohort study
Objectives: To assess and understand the awareness and experience of brain tumour (BT) patients in discussing Advance Care Planning (ACP), to identify main symptoms experienced, physical and functional status perceived quality of life, and level of coping. Methods: A prospective cohort study with an initial open-ended questionnaire followed by semi-structured interview questions regarding ACP with 18 patients diagnosed with BT (WHO Grade I-IV, metastatic BT) in hospital and community. Standardized assessments measured coping strategies, and quality of life (QoL). Interview transcripts regarding ACP discussions were analyzed, coded and interpreted using qualitative analytic techniques for thematic analyses. Results: Participants' mean age was 51 years (range 22-65 years), female (61%); median time since BT diagnosis was 1.5 years and just over half (56%) had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Fatigue was the most common symptom reported by 83% of participants. Overall, participants indicated good QoL and used more problem-focused coping strategies including ‘acceptance’ and ‘positive reframing’. Thematic analyses indicated that participants had limited awareness and understanding of ACP, variable views on appropriate timing of ACP discussions and change of decisions over illness trajectory. Most felt able to discuss ACP and preferred dedicated sessions by a trained health professional. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of providing timely information regarding ACP to BT patients during the course of their disease. Established ACP discussions have an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and to guide delivery of end-of-life care. The demonstrated low uptake of ACP in this pilot study shows need for improved awareness in clinical practice for timely ACP discussions and multifaceted interventions system-wide in implementing ACP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信