{"title":"反思同行评议和专著的命运","authors":"C. Levine","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The MLA's Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Pro motion is to be commended for producing a thoughtful, fair-minded, and constructive report, informed by careful research into historical trends and current conditions. The report provides an extraordinarily clear and useful account of the present crisis for all of us who are concerned about transformations in scholarly publishing and their particularly heavy im pact on junior faculty members.","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"58 1","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Peer Review and the Fate of the Monograph\",\"authors\":\"C. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The MLA's Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Pro motion is to be commended for producing a thoughtful, fair-minded, and constructive report, informed by careful research into historical trends and current conditions. The report provides an extraordinarily clear and useful account of the present crisis for all of us who are concerned about transformations in scholarly publishing and their particularly heavy im pact on junior faculty members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"100-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking Peer Review and the Fate of the Monograph
The MLA's Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Pro motion is to be commended for producing a thoughtful, fair-minded, and constructive report, informed by careful research into historical trends and current conditions. The report provides an extraordinarily clear and useful account of the present crisis for all of us who are concerned about transformations in scholarly publishing and their particularly heavy im pact on junior faculty members.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
