固体废物资源化的效率

David C. Wilson
{"title":"固体废物资源化的效率","authors":"David C. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/0304-3967(79)90012-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Economics does not always adequately reflect the scarcity of physical resources. The contribution which resource recovery from waste makes to the conservation of energy and materials may be measured conveniently by its implications for primary energy use. Process energy analysis is applied to evaluate both the primary energy inputs to an option for waste disposal, treatment or resource recovery, and the savings implied by the use of recovered fuel and material products. The results are expressed as two self-consistent measures of net energy efficiency, differing in whether or not savings from materials recovery are included. The techniques are demonstrated by a case study of some thirty representative options, using the best information available. The results suggest that the use of pulverised waste directly as a fuel is particularly efficient, followed by production of various solid refuse-derived fuels. Options based on incineration or pyrolysis are currently uncompetitive from either a resource conservation or an economic point of view. The energy specific investment in producing a refuse derived fuel is shown to be comparable to that in oil from the North Sea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101078,"journal":{"name":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 161-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(79)90012-X","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficiency of resource recovery from solid waste\",\"authors\":\"David C. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3967(79)90012-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Economics does not always adequately reflect the scarcity of physical resources. The contribution which resource recovery from waste makes to the conservation of energy and materials may be measured conveniently by its implications for primary energy use. Process energy analysis is applied to evaluate both the primary energy inputs to an option for waste disposal, treatment or resource recovery, and the savings implied by the use of recovered fuel and material products. The results are expressed as two self-consistent measures of net energy efficiency, differing in whether or not savings from materials recovery are included. The techniques are demonstrated by a case study of some thirty representative options, using the best information available. The results suggest that the use of pulverised waste directly as a fuel is particularly efficient, followed by production of various solid refuse-derived fuels. Options based on incineration or pyrolysis are currently uncompetitive from either a resource conservation or an economic point of view. The energy specific investment in producing a refuse derived fuel is shown to be comparable to that in oil from the North Sea.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(79)90012-X\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030439677990012X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030439677990012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

经济学并不总是充分反映物质资源的稀缺性。从废物中回收资源对节约能源和材料的贡献可以通过其对初级能源使用的影响来方便地衡量。过程能源分析用于评价废物处置、处理或资源回收方案的主要能源投入,以及使用回收的燃料和材料产品所隐含的节约。结果表示为净能源效率的两个自一致的措施,不同的是是否包括材料回收节省。利用现有的最佳信息,对大约30个有代表性的期权进行了案例研究,证明了这些技术。结果表明,直接使用粉碎的废物作为燃料是特别有效的,然后生产各种固体废物衍生燃料。无论是从资源节约还是从经济角度来看,基于焚烧或热解的选择目前都没有竞争力。生产垃圾衍生燃料的能源特定投资与北海石油的投资相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficiency of resource recovery from solid waste

Economics does not always adequately reflect the scarcity of physical resources. The contribution which resource recovery from waste makes to the conservation of energy and materials may be measured conveniently by its implications for primary energy use. Process energy analysis is applied to evaluate both the primary energy inputs to an option for waste disposal, treatment or resource recovery, and the savings implied by the use of recovered fuel and material products. The results are expressed as two self-consistent measures of net energy efficiency, differing in whether or not savings from materials recovery are included. The techniques are demonstrated by a case study of some thirty representative options, using the best information available. The results suggest that the use of pulverised waste directly as a fuel is particularly efficient, followed by production of various solid refuse-derived fuels. Options based on incineration or pyrolysis are currently uncompetitive from either a resource conservation or an economic point of view. The energy specific investment in producing a refuse derived fuel is shown to be comparable to that in oil from the North Sea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信