为调度集群上的并行作业而选择伙伴分配

Vijay Subramani, R. Kettimuthu, Srividya Srinivasan, J. Johnston, P. Sadayappan
{"title":"为调度集群上的并行作业而选择伙伴分配","authors":"Vijay Subramani, R. Kettimuthu, Srividya Srinivasan, J. Johnston, P. Sadayappan","doi":"10.1109/CLUSTR.2002.1137735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate the performance implications of using a buddy scheme for contiguous node allocation, in conjunction with a backfilling job scheduler for clusters. When a contiguous node allocation strategy is used, there is a trade-off between improved run-time of jobs (due to reduced link contention and lower communication overhead) and increased wait-time of jobs (due to external fragmentation of the processor system). Using trace-based simulation, a buddy strategy for contiguous node allocation is shown to be unattractive compared to the standard noncontiguous allocation strategy used in all production job schedulers. A simple but effective scheme for selective buddy allocation is then proposed, that is shown to perform better than non-contiguous allocation.","PeriodicalId":92128,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective buddy allocation for scheduling parallel jobs on clusters\",\"authors\":\"Vijay Subramani, R. Kettimuthu, Srividya Srinivasan, J. Johnston, P. Sadayappan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLUSTR.2002.1137735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we evaluate the performance implications of using a buddy scheme for contiguous node allocation, in conjunction with a backfilling job scheduler for clusters. When a contiguous node allocation strategy is used, there is a trade-off between improved run-time of jobs (due to reduced link contention and lower communication overhead) and increased wait-time of jobs (due to external fragmentation of the processor system). Using trace-based simulation, a buddy strategy for contiguous node allocation is shown to be unattractive compared to the standard noncontiguous allocation strategy used in all production job schedulers. A simple but effective scheme for selective buddy allocation is then proposed, that is shown to perform better than non-contiguous allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTR.2002.1137735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTR.2002.1137735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了使用伙伴方案进行连续节点分配的性能影响,并结合了集群的回填作业调度器。当使用连续节点分配策略时,在作业运行时间的改进(由于链路争用减少和通信开销降低)和作业等待时间的增加(由于处理器系统的外部碎片)之间存在权衡。使用基于跟踪的模拟,与所有生产作业调度器中使用的标准非连续分配策略相比,用于连续节点分配的伙伴策略没有吸引力。在此基础上,提出了一种简单有效的选择性伙伴分配方案,其性能优于非连续分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective buddy allocation for scheduling parallel jobs on clusters
In this paper we evaluate the performance implications of using a buddy scheme for contiguous node allocation, in conjunction with a backfilling job scheduler for clusters. When a contiguous node allocation strategy is used, there is a trade-off between improved run-time of jobs (due to reduced link contention and lower communication overhead) and increased wait-time of jobs (due to external fragmentation of the processor system). Using trace-based simulation, a buddy strategy for contiguous node allocation is shown to be unattractive compared to the standard noncontiguous allocation strategy used in all production job schedulers. A simple but effective scheme for selective buddy allocation is then proposed, that is shown to perform better than non-contiguous allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信