盘式扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法对大肠菌素药敏试验的比较评估:一家三甲医院的经验。

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Navneet Kaur, Vibhor Tak, Vijaya Lakshmi Nag, Ashwini Agarwal, Pradeep Kumar Bhatia, Neeraj Gupta, Daisy Khera, Akhil Dhanesh Goel
{"title":"盘式扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法对大肠菌素药敏试验的比较评估:一家三甲医院的经验。","authors":"Navneet Kaur, Vibhor Tak, Vijaya Lakshmi Nag, Ashwini Agarwal, Pradeep Kumar Bhatia, Neeraj Gupta, Daisy Khera, Akhil Dhanesh Goel","doi":"10.2174/1871526523666221025121801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent times have seen uninhibited use of colistin due to emergence of carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacteria especially in India and the most common method still employed by most of the laboratories for in vitro testing of colistin is disk diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare two methods for colistin susceptibility testing Methods: This retrospective observational study was done on a total of 212 non-duplicate carbapenem resistant gram-negative isolates from patients attending our tertiary care hospital from April 2019 to June 2020. Colistin susceptibility testing for these isolates was done by disk diffusion method followed by broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found out that disk diffusion method showed relatively low sensitivity [34.5%; 95%CI: 19.94-52.65] but high specificity [99.45%; 95% CI: 96.97 - 99.90] in detecting colistin resistant organisms in comparison to broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disk diffusion method is an unreliable method at detecting colistin resistance. Therefore, we should always rely on susceptibility testing by standard broth microdilution or newly introduced broth disk elution method before dispatching the report even in resource limited settings. The early and accurate reporting of susceptibility results can preserve the therapeutic value of the drug until we have newer treatment options available in the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of colistin susceptibility testing by Disk Diffusion and Broth Microdilution methods: An experience from a tertiary care hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Navneet Kaur, Vibhor Tak, Vijaya Lakshmi Nag, Ashwini Agarwal, Pradeep Kumar Bhatia, Neeraj Gupta, Daisy Khera, Akhil Dhanesh Goel\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1871526523666221025121801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent times have seen uninhibited use of colistin due to emergence of carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacteria especially in India and the most common method still employed by most of the laboratories for in vitro testing of colistin is disk diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare two methods for colistin susceptibility testing Methods: This retrospective observational study was done on a total of 212 non-duplicate carbapenem resistant gram-negative isolates from patients attending our tertiary care hospital from April 2019 to June 2020. Colistin susceptibility testing for these isolates was done by disk diffusion method followed by broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found out that disk diffusion method showed relatively low sensitivity [34.5%; 95%CI: 19.94-52.65] but high specificity [99.45%; 95% CI: 96.97 - 99.90] in detecting colistin resistant organisms in comparison to broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disk diffusion method is an unreliable method at detecting colistin resistance. Therefore, we should always rely on susceptibility testing by standard broth microdilution or newly introduced broth disk elution method before dispatching the report even in resource limited settings. The early and accurate reporting of susceptibility results can preserve the therapeutic value of the drug until we have newer treatment options available in the country.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526523666221025121801\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526523666221025121801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近来,由于出现了对碳青霉烯类耐药的革兰氏阴性菌,特别是在印度,可乐定的使用受到了抑制,而大多数实验室在体外检测可乐定时最常用的方法仍然是盘扩散法:本研究旨在比较两种可乐定药敏试验方法:这项回顾性观察研究的对象是 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 6 月期间在本三级医院就诊的患者中分离出的 212 例非重复的耐碳青霉烯类革兰阴性菌。这些分离菌株的考利司汀药敏试验采用了盘扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法:结果:我们发现,与肉汤微量稀释法相比,磁盘扩散法检测耐药菌的灵敏度相对较低[34.5%;95%CI:19.94-52.65],但特异性较高[99.45%;95%CI:96.97-99.90]:结论:磁盘扩散法是一种检测对可乐定耐药的不可靠方法。因此,即使在资源有限的情况下,我们也应始终依靠标准肉汤微量稀释法或新引入的肉汤盘洗脱法进行药敏试验,然后再发送报告。及早准确地报告药敏结果可以保护药物的治疗价值,直到我们国家有了更新的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of colistin susceptibility testing by Disk Diffusion and Broth Microdilution methods: An experience from a tertiary care hospital.

Background: Recent times have seen uninhibited use of colistin due to emergence of carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacteria especially in India and the most common method still employed by most of the laboratories for in vitro testing of colistin is disk diffusion method.

Objective: The study aimed to compare two methods for colistin susceptibility testing Methods: This retrospective observational study was done on a total of 212 non-duplicate carbapenem resistant gram-negative isolates from patients attending our tertiary care hospital from April 2019 to June 2020. Colistin susceptibility testing for these isolates was done by disk diffusion method followed by broth microdilution method.

Results: We found out that disk diffusion method showed relatively low sensitivity [34.5%; 95%CI: 19.94-52.65] but high specificity [99.45%; 95% CI: 96.97 - 99.90] in detecting colistin resistant organisms in comparison to broth microdilution method.

Conclusion: Disk diffusion method is an unreliable method at detecting colistin resistance. Therefore, we should always rely on susceptibility testing by standard broth microdilution or newly introduced broth disk elution method before dispatching the report even in resource limited settings. The early and accurate reporting of susceptibility results can preserve the therapeutic value of the drug until we have newer treatment options available in the country.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Review
Feminist Review WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Feminist Review is a peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal setting new agendas for the analysis of the social world. Currently based in London with an international scope, FR invites critical reflection on the relationship between materiality and representation, theory and practice, subjectivity and communities, contemporary and historical formations. The FR Collective is committed to exploring gender in its multiple forms and interrelationships. As well as academic articles we publish experimental pieces, visual and textual media and political interventions, including, for example, interviews, short stories, poems and photographic essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信