一种新型手持式角膜计:theNidek KM-500自动角膜计与B&L角膜计和topcon RK-3000A角膜计的比较

PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards, BOptom Pauline Cho
{"title":"一种新型手持式角膜计:theNidek KM-500自动角膜计与B&L角膜计和topcon RK-3000A角膜计的比较","authors":"PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards,&nbsp;BOptom Pauline Cho","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch &amp; Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch &amp; Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 45-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new, hand-held keratometer: comparison of theNidek KM-500 auto keratometer with the B&L keratometer and the topcon RK-3000A keratometer\",\"authors\":\"PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards,&nbsp;BOptom Pauline Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch &amp; Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch &amp; Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 45-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703796800322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703796800322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

Nidek KM-500是最近推出的手持式自动角膜度数计。如果该仪器的准确性和可靠性良好,那么它将为隐形眼镜从业人员和其他临床医生提供许多好处。本研究调查了使用手持Nidek KM-500、Topcon RK-3000A和Bausch &随着角膜散光计。根据制造商的说明使用时,发现Nidek KM-500是可靠的,其读数与台式Topcon KR-3000A获得的读数相当。Bausch &通过取三次读数的平均值,Lomb角膜度数仪可以得到改进。临床医生应该考虑在他们自己的实践中对角膜度数仪进行简单的重复性研究。结果可能有助于指出使用非自动化仪器时技术上的弱点,并将建立角膜半径真正变化的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new, hand-held keratometer: comparison of theNidek KM-500 auto keratometer with the B&L keratometer and the topcon RK-3000A keratometer

The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch & Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch & Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信