PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards, BOptom Pauline Cho
{"title":"一种新型手持式角膜计:theNidek KM-500自动角膜计与B&L角膜计和topcon RK-3000A角膜计的比较","authors":"PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards, BOptom Pauline Cho","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch & Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch & Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"19 2","pages":"Pages 45-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new, hand-held keratometer: comparison of theNidek KM-500 auto keratometer with the B&L keratometer and the topcon RK-3000A keratometer\",\"authors\":\"PhD, FBCO, DCLP Marion H. Edwards, BOptom Pauline Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch & Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch & Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 45-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(96)80032-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703796800322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703796800322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A new, hand-held keratometer: comparison of theNidek KM-500 auto keratometer with the B&L keratometer and the topcon RK-3000A keratometer
The Nidek KM-500 is a recently introduced hand-held automatic keratometer. If the accuracy and reliability of thisinstrument are good then it offers a number of benefits to contact lens practitioners and other clinicians. This study investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of readings taken using the hand-held Nidek KM-500, the Topcon RK-3000A and the Bausch & Lomb keratometer. The Nidek KM-500 was found to be reliable when used according to the manufacturer's instructions and the readings equated well with those obtained with the table-mounted Topcon KR-3000A. The repeatability of the Bausch & Lomb keratometer can be improved by taking the mean of three readings. Clinicians should consider conducting a simple repeatability study of the keratometer used in their own practice. The results may help to pinpoint a weakness in technique when using a non-automated instrument, and will establish the criterion for a true change in corneal radius.