情感和病毒式传播:是什么让在线内容变得病毒式传播?

Jonah A. Berger, Katherine L. Milkman
{"title":"情感和病毒式传播:是什么让在线内容变得病毒式传播?","authors":"Jonah A. Berger, Katherine L. Milkman","doi":"10.2478/GFKMIR-2014-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \"Companies are relying more and more on online communication to reach consumers. While some viral campaigns are tremendously successful, others remain far below expectations. But why are certain pieces of online content more viral than others? An analysis conducted on the New York Times’ most-emailed list, along with further experimental evidence, showed that positive content is more viral than negative content. However, the relationship between emotion and social transmission is more complex than valence alone. Virality is driven, in part, by activation and arousal. Content that evokes either high-arousal positive emotions (awe) or negative emotions (anger or anxiety) tends to be more viral. Content that evokes low arousal or deactivating emotions (e.g., sadness) tends to be less viral. These results were also true when examining how surprising, interesting, or practically useful content is (all of which are positively linked to virality), as well as external drivers of attention (e.g., how prominently content is featured). Taking the effect of emotions into account helps to design effective viral marketing campaigns. \"","PeriodicalId":30678,"journal":{"name":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral?\",\"authors\":\"Jonah A. Berger, Katherine L. Milkman\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/GFKMIR-2014-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\\"Companies are relying more and more on online communication to reach consumers. While some viral campaigns are tremendously successful, others remain far below expectations. But why are certain pieces of online content more viral than others? An analysis conducted on the New York Times’ most-emailed list, along with further experimental evidence, showed that positive content is more viral than negative content. However, the relationship between emotion and social transmission is more complex than valence alone. Virality is driven, in part, by activation and arousal. Content that evokes either high-arousal positive emotions (awe) or negative emotions (anger or anxiety) tends to be more viral. Content that evokes low arousal or deactivating emotions (e.g., sadness) tends to be less viral. These results were also true when examining how surprising, interesting, or practically useful content is (all of which are positively linked to virality), as well as external drivers of attention (e.g., how prominently content is featured). Taking the effect of emotions into account helps to design effective viral marketing campaigns. \\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":30678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/GFKMIR-2014-0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/GFKMIR-2014-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

摘要

“企业越来越依赖在线交流来接触消费者。虽然一些病毒式传播活动取得了巨大成功,但其他活动仍远低于预期。但是,为什么某些在线内容比其他内容更具有病毒性呢?对《纽约时报》最受欢迎的邮件列表进行的一项分析,以及进一步的实验证据表明,积极的内容比消极的内容更容易传播。然而,情绪与社会传递之间的关系比单纯的效价更为复杂。在某种程度上,病毒式传播是由激活和唤醒驱动的。唤起高度兴奋的积极情绪(敬畏)或消极情绪(愤怒或焦虑)的内容往往更容易传播。唤起低唤醒或消极情绪的内容(例如,悲伤)往往不那么具有病毒性。这些结果同样适用于内容的惊喜性、趣味性或实用性(游戏邦注:所有这些都与病毒式传播有关),以及外部注意力驱动因素(游戏邦注:例如,内容的突出程度)。考虑情绪的影响有助于设计有效的病毒式营销活动。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral?
Abstract "Companies are relying more and more on online communication to reach consumers. While some viral campaigns are tremendously successful, others remain far below expectations. But why are certain pieces of online content more viral than others? An analysis conducted on the New York Times’ most-emailed list, along with further experimental evidence, showed that positive content is more viral than negative content. However, the relationship between emotion and social transmission is more complex than valence alone. Virality is driven, in part, by activation and arousal. Content that evokes either high-arousal positive emotions (awe) or negative emotions (anger or anxiety) tends to be more viral. Content that evokes low arousal or deactivating emotions (e.g., sadness) tends to be less viral. These results were also true when examining how surprising, interesting, or practically useful content is (all of which are positively linked to virality), as well as external drivers of attention (e.g., how prominently content is featured). Taking the effect of emotions into account helps to design effective viral marketing campaigns. "
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信