城市垃圾焚烧灰中无机污染物释放量的测定与量化

Tanja Lager, M. Delay, V. Karius, K. Hamer, F. Frimmel, H. Schulz
{"title":"城市垃圾焚烧灰中无机污染物释放量的测定与量化","authors":"Tanja Lager, M. Delay, V. Karius, K. Hamer, F. Frimmel, H. Schulz","doi":"10.1002/AHEH.200500610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various leaching experiments applied to municipal waste incineration ash were compared in order to find the best available procedure to measure the total mass flow caused by natural leaching (source strength) of the material. The results of various batch experiments and two different laboratory column experiments run under water-saturated conditions were compared with water-unsaturated field-scale column experiments (lysimeter). The results of the batch experiments were not transferable to the column and field experiments. But, very good accordance could be observed between the breakthrough curves of the two column experiments conducted in the laboratory under water-saturated conditions and the water-unsaturated field-scale columns, with few exceptions. The results show that batch experiments are not sufficient to predict the source strength and its changes over time. Instead, column experiments are essential for a realistic risk assessment. For most inorganic parameters, a laboratory column experiment lasting less than 5 days is sufficient for a risk assessment in the foreseeable future.","PeriodicalId":7010,"journal":{"name":"Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica","volume":"12 1","pages":"73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination and quantification of the release of inorganic contaminants from municipal waste incineration ash\",\"authors\":\"Tanja Lager, M. Delay, V. Karius, K. Hamer, F. Frimmel, H. Schulz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/AHEH.200500610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various leaching experiments applied to municipal waste incineration ash were compared in order to find the best available procedure to measure the total mass flow caused by natural leaching (source strength) of the material. The results of various batch experiments and two different laboratory column experiments run under water-saturated conditions were compared with water-unsaturated field-scale column experiments (lysimeter). The results of the batch experiments were not transferable to the column and field experiments. But, very good accordance could be observed between the breakthrough curves of the two column experiments conducted in the laboratory under water-saturated conditions and the water-unsaturated field-scale columns, with few exceptions. The results show that batch experiments are not sufficient to predict the source strength and its changes over time. Instead, column experiments are essential for a realistic risk assessment. For most inorganic parameters, a laboratory column experiment lasting less than 5 days is sufficient for a risk assessment in the foreseeable future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"73-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/AHEH.200500610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/AHEH.200500610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

通过对城市垃圾焚烧灰的各种浸出实验进行比较,以找到测量材料自然浸出(源强度)所产生的总质量流量的最佳方法。在饱和水条件下进行的各种批量实验和两种不同的实验室柱实验结果与不饱和水现场规模柱实验(溶渗仪)的结果进行了比较。批量实验的结果不能转移到柱上和现场实验中。但是,在实验室进行的两种饱和水条件下的柱实验的突破曲线与非饱和水现场尺度柱的突破曲线基本一致,几乎没有例外。结果表明,批量实验不足以预测源强度及其随时间的变化。相反,柱实验对于现实的风险评估是必不可少的。对于大多数无机参数,在可预见的将来,持续少于5天的实验室柱实验足以进行风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination and quantification of the release of inorganic contaminants from municipal waste incineration ash
Various leaching experiments applied to municipal waste incineration ash were compared in order to find the best available procedure to measure the total mass flow caused by natural leaching (source strength) of the material. The results of various batch experiments and two different laboratory column experiments run under water-saturated conditions were compared with water-unsaturated field-scale column experiments (lysimeter). The results of the batch experiments were not transferable to the column and field experiments. But, very good accordance could be observed between the breakthrough curves of the two column experiments conducted in the laboratory under water-saturated conditions and the water-unsaturated field-scale columns, with few exceptions. The results show that batch experiments are not sufficient to predict the source strength and its changes over time. Instead, column experiments are essential for a realistic risk assessment. For most inorganic parameters, a laboratory column experiment lasting less than 5 days is sufficient for a risk assessment in the foreseeable future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信