福斯特和巴特勒的戏剧表演

J. Vallejos, Mark Franko
{"title":"福斯特和巴特勒的戏剧表演","authors":"J. Vallejos, Mark Franko","doi":"10.22201/CIEG.2594066XE.2021.62.2272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay starts begins with an analysis of an article by Susan Leigh Foster that criticizes the applicability of Judith Butler’s idea of performativity to dance studies, and in particular, the role of transvestism as a subversion of gender norms. Foster proposes the concept of choreography as an alternative to performativity because it involves the historical imaginary and cultural memory of dance, understood as a subject whose analysis should be crucial to the reconceptualization of gender through movement. The article examines this dispute as a conflict between dance and philosophy studies and explores the differences between ontology and theatricality that lie at the root of the conflict between Butler and Foster. \nKey words: Gender; Performativity; Expression; Choreography; Subversion","PeriodicalId":100355,"journal":{"name":"Debate Feminista","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teatralidad y performance en Foster y Butler\",\"authors\":\"J. Vallejos, Mark Franko\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/CIEG.2594066XE.2021.62.2272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay starts begins with an analysis of an article by Susan Leigh Foster that criticizes the applicability of Judith Butler’s idea of performativity to dance studies, and in particular, the role of transvestism as a subversion of gender norms. Foster proposes the concept of choreography as an alternative to performativity because it involves the historical imaginary and cultural memory of dance, understood as a subject whose analysis should be crucial to the reconceptualization of gender through movement. The article examines this dispute as a conflict between dance and philosophy studies and explores the differences between ontology and theatricality that lie at the root of the conflict between Butler and Foster. \\nKey words: Gender; Performativity; Expression; Choreography; Subversion\",\"PeriodicalId\":100355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Debate Feminista\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Debate Feminista\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/CIEG.2594066XE.2021.62.2272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Debate Feminista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/CIEG.2594066XE.2021.62.2272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先分析苏珊·利·福斯特(Susan Leigh Foster)的一篇文章,该文章批评朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)的表演思想在舞蹈研究中的适用性,特别是异装癖作为颠覆性别规范的角色。福斯特提出了舞蹈编排的概念,作为表演的替代方案,因为它涉及舞蹈的历史想象和文化记忆,被理解为一个主题,其分析对于通过运动重新概念化性别至关重要。本文将这一争论视为舞蹈与哲学研究之间的冲突,并探讨了巴特勒与福斯特之间冲突的根源——本体论与戏剧性之间的差异。关键词:性别;表演;的表情;编排;颠覆
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teatralidad y performance en Foster y Butler
This essay starts begins with an analysis of an article by Susan Leigh Foster that criticizes the applicability of Judith Butler’s idea of performativity to dance studies, and in particular, the role of transvestism as a subversion of gender norms. Foster proposes the concept of choreography as an alternative to performativity because it involves the historical imaginary and cultural memory of dance, understood as a subject whose analysis should be crucial to the reconceptualization of gender through movement. The article examines this dispute as a conflict between dance and philosophy studies and explores the differences between ontology and theatricality that lie at the root of the conflict between Butler and Foster. Key words: Gender; Performativity; Expression; Choreography; Subversion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信