体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射后第2天和第3天胚胎移植的比较

Q4 Medicine
Hemant Shintre, H. Pai, D. Talreja, K. R. Shah, K. Rao
{"title":"体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射后第2天和第3天胚胎移植的比较","authors":"Hemant Shintre, H. Pai, D. Talreja, K. R. Shah, K. Rao","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare reproductive outcomes of day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer (ET). Materials and methods: In this retrospective records study, all couples who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and ET cycles at Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre over a period of 1 year were studied. Data were collected and analyzed by chi-square test and unpaired t-test by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the clinical and demographic parameters of group day 3 and day 2 ET. In our study, clinical pregnancy rate was 45% in day 3 ET and 36.5% in day 2 ET group [odds ratio (OR) 1.43, p-value 0.49]. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 39.2% in day 3 ET and 26.9% in day 2 ET group (OR 1.75, p-value 0.26). We observed that the miscarriage rate was 5.9% in day 3 ET and was 5.8% in day 2 ET group (p-value 0.69, OR 1.02). We observed one case each of multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly (anencephaly) in day 2 ET group, while in day 3 ET group, no such case was detected. Conclusion: There are chances that day 3 ET has better clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates than day 2 ET, but the difference is not statistically significant. Study showed similar miscarriage rates in both groups and very low incidence of complications like multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly. So, it is safe to schedule and transfer embryos either on day 2 or on day 3 for planning and programming cycles in coordination with patient and IVF team and for adjusting weekends (nonworking days). Clinical significance: Many steps of IVF procedure became standardized. However, the optimum timing of ET is still debatable. Several studies comparing ET on day 2 vs day 3 after oocyte retrieval have been performed, but the conclusions are conflicting. Despite development in culture media allowing blastocyst transfer, many centers still practice day 2/3 ET.","PeriodicalId":38998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Day 2 and Day 3 Embryo Transfer following in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection\",\"authors\":\"Hemant Shintre, H. Pai, D. Talreja, K. R. Shah, K. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare reproductive outcomes of day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer (ET). Materials and methods: In this retrospective records study, all couples who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and ET cycles at Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre over a period of 1 year were studied. Data were collected and analyzed by chi-square test and unpaired t-test by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the clinical and demographic parameters of group day 3 and day 2 ET. In our study, clinical pregnancy rate was 45% in day 3 ET and 36.5% in day 2 ET group [odds ratio (OR) 1.43, p-value 0.49]. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 39.2% in day 3 ET and 26.9% in day 2 ET group (OR 1.75, p-value 0.26). We observed that the miscarriage rate was 5.9% in day 3 ET and was 5.8% in day 2 ET group (p-value 0.69, OR 1.02). We observed one case each of multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly (anencephaly) in day 2 ET group, while in day 3 ET group, no such case was detected. Conclusion: There are chances that day 3 ET has better clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates than day 2 ET, but the difference is not statistically significant. Study showed similar miscarriage rates in both groups and very low incidence of complications like multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly. So, it is safe to schedule and transfer embryos either on day 2 or on day 3 for planning and programming cycles in coordination with patient and IVF team and for adjusting weekends (nonworking days). Clinical significance: Many steps of IVF procedure became standardized. However, the optimum timing of ET is still debatable. Several studies comparing ET on day 2 vs day 3 after oocyte retrieval have been performed, but the conclusions are conflicting. Despite development in culture media allowing blastocyst transfer, many centers still practice day 2/3 ET.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"68-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较第2天和第3天胚胎移植(ET)的生殖结局。材料和方法:在这项回顾性记录研究中,所有在Lilavati医院和研究中心接受体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)和ET周期1年的夫妇进行了研究。数据的收集和分析采用卡方检验和非配对t检验,采用Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16。结果:第3天ET组与第2天ET组临床及人口学参数比较,差异无统计学意义。本研究第3天ET组临床妊娠率为45%,第2天ET组临床妊娠率为36.5%[比值比(OR) 1.43, p值0.49]。第3天妊娠率为39.2%,第2天妊娠率为26.9% (OR 1.75, p值0.26)。我们观察到第3天ET组流产率为5.9%,第2天ET组流产率为5.8% (p值0.69,OR 1.02)。第2天ET组多胎妊娠、异位妊娠、胎儿畸形(无脑畸形)各1例,第3天ET组无一例。结论:妊娠第3天的临床和持续妊娠率可能高于妊娠第2天,但差异无统计学意义。研究表明,两组的流产率相似,多胎妊娠、异位妊娠和胎儿畸形等并发症的发生率非常低。因此,在第2天或第3天安排和移植胚胎是安全的,以便与患者和试管婴儿团队协调规划和编程周期,并调整周末(非工作日)。临床意义:试管婴儿的许多步骤变得标准化。然而,ET的最佳时机仍有争议。一些研究比较了卵母细胞提取后第2天和第3天的ET,但结论相互矛盾。尽管培养基的发展允许囊胚转移,但许多中心仍然采用第2/3天的ET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Day 2 and Day 3 Embryo Transfer following in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Aim: To compare reproductive outcomes of day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer (ET). Materials and methods: In this retrospective records study, all couples who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and ET cycles at Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre over a period of 1 year were studied. Data were collected and analyzed by chi-square test and unpaired t-test by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the clinical and demographic parameters of group day 3 and day 2 ET. In our study, clinical pregnancy rate was 45% in day 3 ET and 36.5% in day 2 ET group [odds ratio (OR) 1.43, p-value 0.49]. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 39.2% in day 3 ET and 26.9% in day 2 ET group (OR 1.75, p-value 0.26). We observed that the miscarriage rate was 5.9% in day 3 ET and was 5.8% in day 2 ET group (p-value 0.69, OR 1.02). We observed one case each of multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly (anencephaly) in day 2 ET group, while in day 3 ET group, no such case was detected. Conclusion: There are chances that day 3 ET has better clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates than day 2 ET, but the difference is not statistically significant. Study showed similar miscarriage rates in both groups and very low incidence of complications like multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and fetal anomaly. So, it is safe to schedule and transfer embryos either on day 2 or on day 3 for planning and programming cycles in coordination with patient and IVF team and for adjusting weekends (nonworking days). Clinical significance: Many steps of IVF procedure became standardized. However, the optimum timing of ET is still debatable. Several studies comparing ET on day 2 vs day 3 after oocyte retrieval have been performed, but the conclusions are conflicting. Despite development in culture media allowing blastocyst transfer, many centers still practice day 2/3 ET.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信