魁北克咨询联络模式的实施及其对初级保健提供者的影响

M. Fleury, G. Grenier, D. Robitaille
{"title":"魁北克咨询联络模式的实施及其对初级保健提供者的影响","authors":"M. Fleury, G. Grenier, D. Robitaille","doi":"10.25149/1756-8358.1202012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With increasing resource scarcity in specialized mental healthcare, collaborative care models have been advanced in order to strengthen primary mental healthcare. The consultation-liaison model was introduced in conjunction with sweeping reform of the Quebec (Canada) healthcare system. Respondent-psychiatrists were hired to provide consultation and support to both general practitioners (GP) working in medical clinics and primary care MH teams. This study evaluates the impact of respondent-psychiatrists on the capacity of GPs and primary care teams to diagnose and treat MH disorders, and identifies barriers and facilitators to their deployment within the consultation-liaison model. \nMethods: Eleven local networks provided the setting. Data collection included structured questionnaires completed by 29 respondent-psychiatrists and 33 managers, and semi-structured interviews with 102 network stakeholders. Mixed methods were employed, triangulating data from questionnaires, interviews and network-related documents. \nResults: Respondent-psychiatrists collaborated more effectively with MH primary care teams than with GPs. Barriers to implementation of respondent-psychiatrists were identified, including poor comprehension of the model, inadequate provincial coordination, resistance from psychiatrists and GPs, lack of financial incentives for GPs, little knowledge of GP and patient needs in primary care, and physical distance between GPs and respondent-psychiatrists. \nConclusion: Although respondent-psychiatrists positively impacted MH primary care teams, the consultation-liaison model as implemented did not fully meet needs among GPs who treat most MH problems. Implementation called for better model indicators and provincial-level coordination. A more comprehensive model of collaborative care including integrated MH teams and psychosocial care managers might optimize the use of GPs in primary mental healthcare.","PeriodicalId":89603,"journal":{"name":"Mental health in family medicine","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the Consultation-liaison Model in Quebec and its Impact on Primary Care Providers\",\"authors\":\"M. Fleury, G. Grenier, D. Robitaille\",\"doi\":\"10.25149/1756-8358.1202012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: With increasing resource scarcity in specialized mental healthcare, collaborative care models have been advanced in order to strengthen primary mental healthcare. The consultation-liaison model was introduced in conjunction with sweeping reform of the Quebec (Canada) healthcare system. Respondent-psychiatrists were hired to provide consultation and support to both general practitioners (GP) working in medical clinics and primary care MH teams. This study evaluates the impact of respondent-psychiatrists on the capacity of GPs and primary care teams to diagnose and treat MH disorders, and identifies barriers and facilitators to their deployment within the consultation-liaison model. \\nMethods: Eleven local networks provided the setting. Data collection included structured questionnaires completed by 29 respondent-psychiatrists and 33 managers, and semi-structured interviews with 102 network stakeholders. Mixed methods were employed, triangulating data from questionnaires, interviews and network-related documents. \\nResults: Respondent-psychiatrists collaborated more effectively with MH primary care teams than with GPs. Barriers to implementation of respondent-psychiatrists were identified, including poor comprehension of the model, inadequate provincial coordination, resistance from psychiatrists and GPs, lack of financial incentives for GPs, little knowledge of GP and patient needs in primary care, and physical distance between GPs and respondent-psychiatrists. \\nConclusion: Although respondent-psychiatrists positively impacted MH primary care teams, the consultation-liaison model as implemented did not fully meet needs among GPs who treat most MH problems. Implementation called for better model indicators and provincial-level coordination. A more comprehensive model of collaborative care including integrated MH teams and psychosocial care managers might optimize the use of GPs in primary mental healthcare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health in family medicine\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health in family medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25149/1756-8358.1202012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health in family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25149/1756-8358.1202012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:随着专业精神卫生资源的日益匮乏,为加强初级精神卫生服务,协作护理模式已被提出。咨询联络模式是在魁北克省(加拿大)医疗保健系统全面改革的同时引入的。调查心理医生被雇用为在医疗诊所和初级保健MH团队工作的全科医生(GP)提供咨询和支持。本研究评估了受访精神科医生对全科医生和初级保健团队诊断和治疗MH障碍能力的影响,并确定了在咨询联络模式中部署他们的障碍和促进因素。方法:11个本地网络提供设置。数据收集包括29名受访精神科医生和33名管理人员完成的结构化问卷,以及102名网络利益相关者的半结构化访谈。采用混合方法,对问卷调查、访谈和网络相关文件的数据进行三角测量。结果:受访精神科医生与医院初级保健团队的合作比与全科医生的合作更有效。调查还发现了实施应诊精神科医生的障碍,包括对该模式的理解不足、省级协调不足、精神科医生和全科医生的抵制、对全科医生缺乏经济激励、对全科医生和患者初级保健需求的了解不足、以及全科医生和应诊精神科医生之间的物理距离。结论:虽然受访精神科医师对MH初级保健团队有正面影响,但实施的咨询联络模式并不能完全满足治疗大多数MH问题的全科医生的需求。实施需要更好的示范指标和省级协调。包括综合医院团队和心理社会护理管理人员在内的更全面的协作护理模式可能会优化全科医生在初级精神卫生保健中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of the Consultation-liaison Model in Quebec and its Impact on Primary Care Providers
Background: With increasing resource scarcity in specialized mental healthcare, collaborative care models have been advanced in order to strengthen primary mental healthcare. The consultation-liaison model was introduced in conjunction with sweeping reform of the Quebec (Canada) healthcare system. Respondent-psychiatrists were hired to provide consultation and support to both general practitioners (GP) working in medical clinics and primary care MH teams. This study evaluates the impact of respondent-psychiatrists on the capacity of GPs and primary care teams to diagnose and treat MH disorders, and identifies barriers and facilitators to their deployment within the consultation-liaison model. Methods: Eleven local networks provided the setting. Data collection included structured questionnaires completed by 29 respondent-psychiatrists and 33 managers, and semi-structured interviews with 102 network stakeholders. Mixed methods were employed, triangulating data from questionnaires, interviews and network-related documents. Results: Respondent-psychiatrists collaborated more effectively with MH primary care teams than with GPs. Barriers to implementation of respondent-psychiatrists were identified, including poor comprehension of the model, inadequate provincial coordination, resistance from psychiatrists and GPs, lack of financial incentives for GPs, little knowledge of GP and patient needs in primary care, and physical distance between GPs and respondent-psychiatrists. Conclusion: Although respondent-psychiatrists positively impacted MH primary care teams, the consultation-liaison model as implemented did not fully meet needs among GPs who treat most MH problems. Implementation called for better model indicators and provincial-level coordination. A more comprehensive model of collaborative care including integrated MH teams and psychosocial care managers might optimize the use of GPs in primary mental healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信