肝友好型药物治疗胃肠道疾病:生计评分疗效评价

Chowdhury Md Navim Kabir
{"title":"肝友好型药物治疗胃肠道疾病:生计评分疗效评价","authors":"Chowdhury Md Navim Kabir","doi":"10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compare efficacy and safety level different Proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor blockers by livelihood score category.\nMethods: 52 participants (30 male and 22 female) participated in this cross sectional studies. They were asked about their drug history specially pattern of drug, starting time, change history (if applicable) dosage schedule, relevant adverse effects etc.\nResults: Out of 52 participants, 27 patients (52%) regularly took proton pump inhibitors for avoiding gastro intestinal irritations more than 7-8 months.10 patients having heart burn and rest of taking different medication for improvement. Out of 27 patients 10 were male and 17 were female. Dependency upon proton pump inhibitors was more in female due to spicy food intake and lack of punctuality of meal. Important clue that 17 patients switch to lansoprazole/rabeprazole from omeprazole/esomeprazole due to insufficient duration of anti-heart burn activity. Condition improved after starting lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole/rabeprazole. Livelihood score of Rabeprazole is D and for lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole it is C. That means hepatic injury is unlikely such as enzyme elevation. Rest of 20 patients who had history of occasional proton pump inhibitor use.Remaining 5 participants didn’t give adequate information about their drug history. After switching, 10 patients found fatty liver grade 1 which previously diagnosed as grade 2.\nConclusion: Carbohydrate and protein dominancy in daily food is prime reason for GIT irritation. In advance stage fate may be ulceration as well as non- alcoholic fatty liver disease. Avoiding unnecessary Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selection of proton pump inhibitors according to livelihood score, decrease patient’s gastric irritation as well as establishing healthy drug usage.\nJ Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 224","PeriodicalId":8721,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases by Liver Friendly Drugs: Evaluation of Livelihood Score Efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Chowdhury Md Navim Kabir\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Compare efficacy and safety level different Proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor blockers by livelihood score category.\\nMethods: 52 participants (30 male and 22 female) participated in this cross sectional studies. They were asked about their drug history specially pattern of drug, starting time, change history (if applicable) dosage schedule, relevant adverse effects etc.\\nResults: Out of 52 participants, 27 patients (52%) regularly took proton pump inhibitors for avoiding gastro intestinal irritations more than 7-8 months.10 patients having heart burn and rest of taking different medication for improvement. Out of 27 patients 10 were male and 17 were female. Dependency upon proton pump inhibitors was more in female due to spicy food intake and lack of punctuality of meal. Important clue that 17 patients switch to lansoprazole/rabeprazole from omeprazole/esomeprazole due to insufficient duration of anti-heart burn activity. Condition improved after starting lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole/rabeprazole. Livelihood score of Rabeprazole is D and for lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole it is C. That means hepatic injury is unlikely such as enzyme elevation. Rest of 20 patients who had history of occasional proton pump inhibitor use.Remaining 5 participants didn’t give adequate information about their drug history. After switching, 10 patients found fatty liver grade 1 which previously diagnosed as grade 2.\\nConclusion: Carbohydrate and protein dominancy in daily food is prime reason for GIT irritation. In advance stage fate may be ulceration as well as non- alcoholic fatty liver disease. Avoiding unnecessary Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selection of proton pump inhibitors according to livelihood score, decrease patient’s gastric irritation as well as establishing healthy drug usage.\\nJ Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 224\",\"PeriodicalId\":8721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过生计评分分类比较不同质子泵抑制剂和H2受体阻滞剂的疗效和安全性。方法:52名受试者(男30名,女22名)参加了横断面研究。询问患者的用药史,特别是用药方式、起始时间、改变史(如适用)给药方案、相关不良反应等。结果:52例患者中,27例(52%)定期服用质子泵抑制剂以避免胃肠道刺激超过7-8个月。10例患者有心脏烧伤,其余患者服用不同的药物改善。27例患者中男性10例,女性17例。对质子泵抑制剂的依赖在女性中更多,这是由于辛辣食物的摄入和进餐时间的缺乏。重要的线索是,17名患者因抗心脏烧伤活性持续时间不足而从奥美拉唑/埃索美拉唑切换到兰索拉唑/雷贝拉唑。开始使用兰索拉唑/右兰索拉唑/雷贝拉唑后病情好转。雷贝拉唑生计评分为D,兰索拉唑/右兰索拉唑生计评分为c,不太可能出现酶升高等肝损伤。其余20例患者有偶尔使用质子泵抑制剂的病史。其余5名参与者没有提供足够的药物史信息。转换后,10例患者发现1级脂肪肝,之前诊断为2级。结论:日常食物中以碳水化合物和蛋白质为主是胃肠道刺激的主要原因。在早期阶段的命运可能是溃疡以及非酒精性脂肪肝疾病。避免使用不必要的非甾体类抗炎药,根据生计评分选择质子泵抑制剂,减少患者对胃的刺激,建立健康用药。中华医学杂志2023;第34卷,第2(1)号补编:224
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases by Liver Friendly Drugs: Evaluation of Livelihood Score Efficacy
Background: Compare efficacy and safety level different Proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor blockers by livelihood score category. Methods: 52 participants (30 male and 22 female) participated in this cross sectional studies. They were asked about their drug history specially pattern of drug, starting time, change history (if applicable) dosage schedule, relevant adverse effects etc. Results: Out of 52 participants, 27 patients (52%) regularly took proton pump inhibitors for avoiding gastro intestinal irritations more than 7-8 months.10 patients having heart burn and rest of taking different medication for improvement. Out of 27 patients 10 were male and 17 were female. Dependency upon proton pump inhibitors was more in female due to spicy food intake and lack of punctuality of meal. Important clue that 17 patients switch to lansoprazole/rabeprazole from omeprazole/esomeprazole due to insufficient duration of anti-heart burn activity. Condition improved after starting lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole/rabeprazole. Livelihood score of Rabeprazole is D and for lansoprazole/dexlansoprazole it is C. That means hepatic injury is unlikely such as enzyme elevation. Rest of 20 patients who had history of occasional proton pump inhibitor use.Remaining 5 participants didn’t give adequate information about their drug history. After switching, 10 patients found fatty liver grade 1 which previously diagnosed as grade 2. Conclusion: Carbohydrate and protein dominancy in daily food is prime reason for GIT irritation. In advance stage fate may be ulceration as well as non- alcoholic fatty liver disease. Avoiding unnecessary Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selection of proton pump inhibitors according to livelihood score, decrease patient’s gastric irritation as well as establishing healthy drug usage. J Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 224
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信