诺森伯兰古英语的gloses

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
E. Gelderen
{"title":"诺森伯兰古英语的gloses","authors":"E. Gelderen","doi":"10.1075/nowele.72.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The articles in this volume contribute to our understanding of Northumbrian Old English of the 10th century, of\n the nature of external influence, and of the authorship of the glosses. This introduction provides a background to these three\n areas. Most of the introduction and contributions examine the Lindisfarne Glosses with some discussion of the Rushworth and Durham\n Glosses. Section 2 shows that the Lindisfarne glossator often adds a (first and second\n person) pronoun where the Latin has none but allows third person null subjects. Therefore, although the Latin original has obvious\n influence, Old English grammar comes through. Section 3 reviews the loss of third person\n -th verbal inflection in favor of -s, especially in Matthew. This reduction may be relevant\n to the role of external (Scandinavian and British Celtic) influence and is also interesting when the language of the Lindisfarne\n and Durham Glosses is compared. In Section 4, the use of overt pronouns, relatives, and\n demonstratives shows an early use of th-pronouns, casting doubt on a Norse origin of they.\n Section 5 looks at negation mainly from a northern versus southern perspective and Section 6 sums up. Section 7 previews the other\n contributions and their major themes, namely possible external (Latin, Norse, or British Celtic) influence, the linguistic\n differences among glossators, the spacing of ‘prefixes’ as evidence for grammaticalization, and the role of doublets.","PeriodicalId":41411,"journal":{"name":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Northumbrian Old English glosses\",\"authors\":\"E. Gelderen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/nowele.72.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The articles in this volume contribute to our understanding of Northumbrian Old English of the 10th century, of\\n the nature of external influence, and of the authorship of the glosses. This introduction provides a background to these three\\n areas. Most of the introduction and contributions examine the Lindisfarne Glosses with some discussion of the Rushworth and Durham\\n Glosses. Section 2 shows that the Lindisfarne glossator often adds a (first and second\\n person) pronoun where the Latin has none but allows third person null subjects. Therefore, although the Latin original has obvious\\n influence, Old English grammar comes through. Section 3 reviews the loss of third person\\n -th verbal inflection in favor of -s, especially in Matthew. This reduction may be relevant\\n to the role of external (Scandinavian and British Celtic) influence and is also interesting when the language of the Lindisfarne\\n and Durham Glosses is compared. In Section 4, the use of overt pronouns, relatives, and\\n demonstratives shows an early use of th-pronouns, casting doubt on a Norse origin of they.\\n Section 5 looks at negation mainly from a northern versus southern perspective and Section 6 sums up. Section 7 previews the other\\n contributions and their major themes, namely possible external (Latin, Norse, or British Celtic) influence, the linguistic\\n differences among glossators, the spacing of ‘prefixes’ as evidence for grammaticalization, and the role of doublets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.72.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.72.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本卷中的文章有助于我们了解10世纪的诺森伯兰古英语,外部影响的性质,以及作者的著作。本文介绍了这三个领域的背景。大多数的介绍和贡献检查林迪斯法恩gloses与一些讨论拉什沃思和达勒姆gloses。第2节表明,Lindisfarne注释器经常在拉丁语中没有代词的地方添加(第一人称和第二人称)代词,但允许第三人称空主语。因此,尽管拉丁语原文有明显的影响,古英语语法还是体现了出来。第3节回顾了第三人称的缺失-s的动词变化,特别是在马太福音中。这种减少可能与外部(斯堪的纳维亚和英国凯尔特人)影响的作用有关,当比较林迪斯法恩和达勒姆gloses的语言时,也很有趣。在第4节中,显性代词、亲属代词和指示代词的使用表明了th-代词的早期使用,对它们的挪威起源产生了怀疑。第5部分主要从南北对比的角度来看待否定,第6部分进行总结。第7节概述了其他贡献及其主要主题,即可能的外部影响(拉丁语,挪威语或英国凯尔特语),注释器之间的语言差异,“前缀”间距作为语法化的证据,以及双音的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Northumbrian Old English glosses
The articles in this volume contribute to our understanding of Northumbrian Old English of the 10th century, of the nature of external influence, and of the authorship of the glosses. This introduction provides a background to these three areas. Most of the introduction and contributions examine the Lindisfarne Glosses with some discussion of the Rushworth and Durham Glosses. Section 2 shows that the Lindisfarne glossator often adds a (first and second person) pronoun where the Latin has none but allows third person null subjects. Therefore, although the Latin original has obvious influence, Old English grammar comes through. Section 3 reviews the loss of third person -th verbal inflection in favor of -s, especially in Matthew. This reduction may be relevant to the role of external (Scandinavian and British Celtic) influence and is also interesting when the language of the Lindisfarne and Durham Glosses is compared. In Section 4, the use of overt pronouns, relatives, and demonstratives shows an early use of th-pronouns, casting doubt on a Norse origin of they. Section 5 looks at negation mainly from a northern versus southern perspective and Section 6 sums up. Section 7 previews the other contributions and their major themes, namely possible external (Latin, Norse, or British Celtic) influence, the linguistic differences among glossators, the spacing of ‘prefixes’ as evidence for grammaticalization, and the role of doublets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信