德国隐私权和数据保护法律的判例参考

Q4 Social Sciences
Alejandro Laje
{"title":"德国隐私权和数据保护法律的判例参考","authors":"Alejandro Laje","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy right is generally based on individualistic arguments, however the solidarity principle must apply, providing privacy right a social approach. This paper argues that such understanding is found in the rulings of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and analysis relevant evidence in that regard. It concludes that the right of information self-determination in Germany is set within its proper social place, where the person must be able to maintain his/her autonomy in a context defined socially, and remain responsible for the general good.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"22 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sozialer Rechsstaat as a reference for privacy right and data protections laws in German jurisprudence\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Laje\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy right is generally based on individualistic arguments, however the solidarity principle must apply, providing privacy right a social approach. This paper argues that such understanding is found in the rulings of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and analysis relevant evidence in that regard. It concludes that the right of information self-determination in Germany is set within its proper social place, where the person must be able to maintain his/her autonomy in a context defined socially, and remain responsible for the general good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隐私权一般以个人主义论证为基础,但必须适用团结原则,为隐私权提供一种社会性的途径。本文认为这种认识在德国联邦宪法法院的判决中有所体现,并对相关证据进行了分析。它的结论是,在德国,信息自决权被置于其适当的社会地位,在那里,个人必须能够在社会定义的背景下保持他/她的自主权,并对普遍利益负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Sozialer Rechsstaat as a reference for privacy right and data protections laws in German jurisprudence
Privacy right is generally based on individualistic arguments, however the solidarity principle must apply, providing privacy right a social approach. This paper argues that such understanding is found in the rulings of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and analysis relevant evidence in that regard. It concludes that the right of information self-determination in Germany is set within its proper social place, where the person must be able to maintain his/her autonomy in a context defined socially, and remain responsible for the general good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信