动荡的社会:对创新社会学理论和方法论的呼唤

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
T. Nyawasha, N. Xulu-Gama
{"title":"动荡的社会:对创新社会学理论和方法论的呼唤","authors":"T. Nyawasha, N. Xulu-Gama","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2022.2088155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We write this editorial against the background of several things that are unfolding within our society. Judging by what we are beginning to see around the globe, the indication is that we are slowly entering what we would call a “post-pandemic” phase. Although not certain what the future looks like after emerging from one of the worst experiences that we have gone through for the past two years, it seems we are living in a tumultuous society. Locally, the deadly floods in KwaZulu-Natal, the growing incidences of anti-immigrant vigilantism, and the constant loadshedding episodes are but a few indicators. Globally, the war in Ukraine serves to illustrate the same. Given all these, the scope of interrogation and analysis for our journal (SARS) remains wide but honing down to some of these issues that our society continues to grapple with. For this, we remain eternally grateful to our contributors and reviewers, who are not merely spectators of the many social, political and economic processes unfolding within our society. It is clear these processes resemble not only a “tumultuous society” but “a society in transition,”. And making sense of this “society” requires deep methodological and theoretical reflections. To decipher what these changes/processes mean, and their significance, innovative sociological theory and methodology are required. Our journal has over the years been instrumental in shaping public discourse on several issues in South Africa and beyond. With every issue that we publish, we seek to continue the tradition of sharing highly engaging (both theoretical and empirical) scholarship. For instance, in one of our last volumes (vol. 51, issue 3–4), we published detailed empirical work on homelessness in South Africa, and the Covid-19 pandemic. This was followed by our volume 52 (issue 1) which also contained fascinating articles.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumultuous Society: The Call for Innovative Sociological Theory and Methodology\",\"authors\":\"T. Nyawasha, N. Xulu-Gama\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21528586.2022.2088155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We write this editorial against the background of several things that are unfolding within our society. Judging by what we are beginning to see around the globe, the indication is that we are slowly entering what we would call a “post-pandemic” phase. Although not certain what the future looks like after emerging from one of the worst experiences that we have gone through for the past two years, it seems we are living in a tumultuous society. Locally, the deadly floods in KwaZulu-Natal, the growing incidences of anti-immigrant vigilantism, and the constant loadshedding episodes are but a few indicators. Globally, the war in Ukraine serves to illustrate the same. Given all these, the scope of interrogation and analysis for our journal (SARS) remains wide but honing down to some of these issues that our society continues to grapple with. For this, we remain eternally grateful to our contributors and reviewers, who are not merely spectators of the many social, political and economic processes unfolding within our society. It is clear these processes resemble not only a “tumultuous society” but “a society in transition,”. And making sense of this “society” requires deep methodological and theoretical reflections. To decipher what these changes/processes mean, and their significance, innovative sociological theory and methodology are required. Our journal has over the years been instrumental in shaping public discourse on several issues in South Africa and beyond. With every issue that we publish, we seek to continue the tradition of sharing highly engaging (both theoretical and empirical) scholarship. For instance, in one of our last volumes (vol. 51, issue 3–4), we published detailed empirical work on homelessness in South Africa, and the Covid-19 pandemic. This was followed by our volume 52 (issue 1) which also contained fascinating articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2088155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2088155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们写这篇社论的背景是我们的社会正在发生的一些事情。从我们开始在全球各地看到的情况来看,有迹象表明我们正在慢慢进入我们所谓的“大流行后”阶段。虽然不知道从过去两年最糟糕的经历中走出来的未来会是什么样子,但我们似乎生活在一个动荡的社会中。在当地,夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省致命的洪水、日益增多的反移民自发抗议活动以及不断发生的停电事件只是一些迹象。从全球来看,乌克兰战争也说明了这一点。考虑到所有这些,我们的期刊(SARS)的审问和分析范围仍然很广,但深入到我们社会继续努力解决的一些问题。为此,我们永远感谢我们的撰稿人和审稿人,他们不仅仅是我们社会中展开的许多社会、政治和经济进程的旁观者。很明显,这些过程不仅类似于一个“动荡的社会”,而且类似于一个“转型中的社会”。而理解这种“社会”需要深刻的方法论和理论反思。为了解读这些变化/过程的含义及其意义,需要创新的社会学理论和方法论。多年来,我们的期刊在塑造南非及其他地区若干问题的公共话语方面发挥了重要作用。在我们出版的每一期中,我们都寻求继续分享高度吸引人的(理论和实证)奖学金的传统。例如,在我们的最后一卷(第51卷,第3-4期)中,我们发表了关于南非无家可归和Covid-19大流行的详细实证研究。接下来是我们的第52卷(第1期),其中也有引人入胜的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumultuous Society: The Call for Innovative Sociological Theory and Methodology
We write this editorial against the background of several things that are unfolding within our society. Judging by what we are beginning to see around the globe, the indication is that we are slowly entering what we would call a “post-pandemic” phase. Although not certain what the future looks like after emerging from one of the worst experiences that we have gone through for the past two years, it seems we are living in a tumultuous society. Locally, the deadly floods in KwaZulu-Natal, the growing incidences of anti-immigrant vigilantism, and the constant loadshedding episodes are but a few indicators. Globally, the war in Ukraine serves to illustrate the same. Given all these, the scope of interrogation and analysis for our journal (SARS) remains wide but honing down to some of these issues that our society continues to grapple with. For this, we remain eternally grateful to our contributors and reviewers, who are not merely spectators of the many social, political and economic processes unfolding within our society. It is clear these processes resemble not only a “tumultuous society” but “a society in transition,”. And making sense of this “society” requires deep methodological and theoretical reflections. To decipher what these changes/processes mean, and their significance, innovative sociological theory and methodology are required. Our journal has over the years been instrumental in shaping public discourse on several issues in South Africa and beyond. With every issue that we publish, we seek to continue the tradition of sharing highly engaging (both theoretical and empirical) scholarship. For instance, in one of our last volumes (vol. 51, issue 3–4), we published detailed empirical work on homelessness in South Africa, and the Covid-19 pandemic. This was followed by our volume 52 (issue 1) which also contained fascinating articles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信