活动(ADL)调整对减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者疼痛的影响

Q4 Medicine
Khandaker Md Kamrul Islam, Md. Ahsanul Hoque, M. Akter
{"title":"活动(ADL)调整对减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者疼痛的影响","authors":"Khandaker Md Kamrul Islam, Md. Ahsanul Hoque, M. Akter","doi":"10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objective: : Low back pain is the commonest cause of activity limitations and absence of work in developing country like Bangladesh. The aim of this study was to chalk out the association between ADL modification with chronic low back pain.\nMaterials & Methods: : This Randomized Clinical Trial was performed in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, JRRMCH, Sylhet. Eighty patients of 30 to 60 years old, fulfilling the selection criteria were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups after randomization by lottery method. Patients of Group-A were treated with NSAID, Anti-ulcerant & Activity (ADL) Modification while patients of Group-B were treated with NSAID and Anti-ulcerant only. Patients of both groups were treated for six weeks. Main outcome measures were Subjective Pain Intensity Score, VAS, Tenderness Index, Disability due to pain, Spinal Mobility Index and Oswestry Disability Index.\nResults: Majority of the patients of both groups were 30 to 40 years old (52.5% in Group-A and 47.5% in Group-B). Males were predominant in both groups. While majority belongs to middle socio-economic class, occupationally farmers were majority in both groups (22.5% in Group-A and 20% in Group-B). VAS was better in patients who received instructions about activity (ADL) modification than those who did not receive them. Subjective Pain Intensity Score and Tenderness Index improved in both groups but their difference was not statistically significant. Disability due to Pain and Spinal Mobility Index, both the variables improved at the end of 3rd week and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).\nConclusion: From the study it can be concluded that Activity (ADL) Modification helps to reduce pain in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.\nMedicine Today 2022 Vol.34(2): 140-144","PeriodicalId":39348,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Today","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Activity (ADL) Modification on Reduction of Pain in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Khandaker Md Kamrul Islam, Md. Ahsanul Hoque, M. Akter\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction & Objective: : Low back pain is the commonest cause of activity limitations and absence of work in developing country like Bangladesh. The aim of this study was to chalk out the association between ADL modification with chronic low back pain.\\nMaterials & Methods: : This Randomized Clinical Trial was performed in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, JRRMCH, Sylhet. Eighty patients of 30 to 60 years old, fulfilling the selection criteria were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups after randomization by lottery method. Patients of Group-A were treated with NSAID, Anti-ulcerant & Activity (ADL) Modification while patients of Group-B were treated with NSAID and Anti-ulcerant only. Patients of both groups were treated for six weeks. Main outcome measures were Subjective Pain Intensity Score, VAS, Tenderness Index, Disability due to pain, Spinal Mobility Index and Oswestry Disability Index.\\nResults: Majority of the patients of both groups were 30 to 40 years old (52.5% in Group-A and 47.5% in Group-B). Males were predominant in both groups. While majority belongs to middle socio-economic class, occupationally farmers were majority in both groups (22.5% in Group-A and 20% in Group-B). VAS was better in patients who received instructions about activity (ADL) modification than those who did not receive them. Subjective Pain Intensity Score and Tenderness Index improved in both groups but their difference was not statistically significant. Disability due to Pain and Spinal Mobility Index, both the variables improved at the end of 3rd week and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).\\nConclusion: From the study it can be concluded that Activity (ADL) Modification helps to reduce pain in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.\\nMedicine Today 2022 Vol.34(2): 140-144\",\"PeriodicalId\":39348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Today\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍与目的:腰痛是活动限制和缺乏工作的发展中国家,如孟加拉国的最常见的原因。本研究的目的是找出ADL改良与慢性腰痛之间的关系。材料与方法:本随机临床试验在Sylhet JRRMCH物理医学与康复学系进行。本研究纳入80例符合入选标准的30 ~ 60岁患者。采用摇号法将患者随机分为两组。a组患者给予非甾体抗炎药和抗溃疡活性(ADL)修饰剂治疗,b组患者仅给予非甾体抗炎药和抗溃疡药治疗。两组患者均治疗6周。主要观察指标为主观疼痛强度评分、VAS评分、压痛指数、疼痛致残指数、脊柱活动指数和Oswestry致残指数。结果:两组患者以30 ~ 40岁为主(a组为52.5%,b组为47.5%)。两组均以男性为主。虽然大多数人属于中等社会经济阶层,但职业农民在两个群体中都占多数(a组为22.5%,b组为20%)。接受有关活动(ADL)修改指导的患者的VAS优于未接受指导的患者。两组患者主观疼痛强度评分和压痛指数均有改善,但差异无统计学意义。疼痛致残和脊柱活动指数在第3周时均有所改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:活动(ADL)改良有助于减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛。今日医学2022 Vol.34(2): 140-144
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Activity (ADL) Modification on Reduction of Pain in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Introduction & Objective: : Low back pain is the commonest cause of activity limitations and absence of work in developing country like Bangladesh. The aim of this study was to chalk out the association between ADL modification with chronic low back pain. Materials & Methods: : This Randomized Clinical Trial was performed in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, JRRMCH, Sylhet. Eighty patients of 30 to 60 years old, fulfilling the selection criteria were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups after randomization by lottery method. Patients of Group-A were treated with NSAID, Anti-ulcerant & Activity (ADL) Modification while patients of Group-B were treated with NSAID and Anti-ulcerant only. Patients of both groups were treated for six weeks. Main outcome measures were Subjective Pain Intensity Score, VAS, Tenderness Index, Disability due to pain, Spinal Mobility Index and Oswestry Disability Index. Results: Majority of the patients of both groups were 30 to 40 years old (52.5% in Group-A and 47.5% in Group-B). Males were predominant in both groups. While majority belongs to middle socio-economic class, occupationally farmers were majority in both groups (22.5% in Group-A and 20% in Group-B). VAS was better in patients who received instructions about activity (ADL) modification than those who did not receive them. Subjective Pain Intensity Score and Tenderness Index improved in both groups but their difference was not statistically significant. Disability due to Pain and Spinal Mobility Index, both the variables improved at the end of 3rd week and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: From the study it can be concluded that Activity (ADL) Modification helps to reduce pain in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Medicine Today 2022 Vol.34(2): 140-144
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine Today
Medicine Today Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信