创新区绩效目标设定的比较分析

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez, D. Güemes-Castorena, M. Flegl
{"title":"创新区绩效目标设定的比较分析","authors":"Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez, D. Güemes-Castorena, M. Flegl","doi":"10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Innovation districts represent a way to create, foster, and manage innovation. Different regions apply their strategy according to the dominant stakeholder in the region, such as academia, industry, government, or entrepreneurs. This research aims to evaluate different innovation districts from a production system point of view to determine the output goals for a Tec Innovation District.\nMethodology/Approach: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was determined to be the best tool for this study; the variable returns to scale output-oriented model was used to determine the goals for the new district; also, the bootstrap method was employed to analyse the efficiency sensitivity in the sample of districts.\nFindings: The average technical efficiency of the analysed innovation districts was 0.659, with the highest technical efficiency observed in the case of the Entrepreneurial type (0.831) and Industry Cluster (0.820) districts, whereas the Local government type registered the lowest technical efficiency (0.468).\nResearch Limitation/Implication: The projections for the Tec Innovation District’s output variables were obtained using a set of U.S. innovation districts due to the similarity of the studied region to the available group. The research allowed us to determine realistic outputs for the studied innovation district.\nOriginality/Value of paper: The study employs an original DEA for comparing innovation districts and performs a bootstrap to study the system’s robustness; within this research, the performance level of a new district was calculated to be within a specific efficiency level, according to their peers.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez, D. Güemes-Castorena, M. Flegl\",\"doi\":\"10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Innovation districts represent a way to create, foster, and manage innovation. Different regions apply their strategy according to the dominant stakeholder in the region, such as academia, industry, government, or entrepreneurs. This research aims to evaluate different innovation districts from a production system point of view to determine the output goals for a Tec Innovation District.\\nMethodology/Approach: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was determined to be the best tool for this study; the variable returns to scale output-oriented model was used to determine the goals for the new district; also, the bootstrap method was employed to analyse the efficiency sensitivity in the sample of districts.\\nFindings: The average technical efficiency of the analysed innovation districts was 0.659, with the highest technical efficiency observed in the case of the Entrepreneurial type (0.831) and Industry Cluster (0.820) districts, whereas the Local government type registered the lowest technical efficiency (0.468).\\nResearch Limitation/Implication: The projections for the Tec Innovation District’s output variables were obtained using a set of U.S. innovation districts due to the similarity of the studied region to the available group. The research allowed us to determine realistic outputs for the studied innovation district.\\nOriginality/Value of paper: The study employs an original DEA for comparing innovation districts and performs a bootstrap to study the system’s robustness; within this research, the performance level of a new district was calculated to be within a specific efficiency level, according to their peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创新区代表了一种创造、培育和管理创新的方式。不同地区根据该地区的主要利益相关者(如学术界、工业界、政府或企业家)实施战略。本研究旨在从生产系统的角度对不同的创新区进行评估,以确定科技创新区的产出目标。方法/方法:数据包络分析(DEA)被确定为本研究的最佳工具;采用规模产出导向的变量收益模型确定新区的发展目标;同时,采用自举法对地区样本的效率敏感性进行了分析。结果表明:各创新区平均技术效率为0.659,其中创业型和产业集群型技术效率最高(0.831),地方政府型技术效率最低(0.468);研究局限/启示:由于研究区域与现有群体的相似性,对Tec创新区产出变量的预测是使用一组美国创新区来获得的。该研究使我们能够为所研究的创新区确定现实的产出。原创性/论文价值:本研究采用原创性DEA对创新区进行比较,并采用bootstrap对系统的鲁棒性进行研究;在这项研究中,一个新区的绩效水平被计算为在一个特定的效率水平内,根据他们的同行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District
Purpose: Innovation districts represent a way to create, foster, and manage innovation. Different regions apply their strategy according to the dominant stakeholder in the region, such as academia, industry, government, or entrepreneurs. This research aims to evaluate different innovation districts from a production system point of view to determine the output goals for a Tec Innovation District. Methodology/Approach: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was determined to be the best tool for this study; the variable returns to scale output-oriented model was used to determine the goals for the new district; also, the bootstrap method was employed to analyse the efficiency sensitivity in the sample of districts. Findings: The average technical efficiency of the analysed innovation districts was 0.659, with the highest technical efficiency observed in the case of the Entrepreneurial type (0.831) and Industry Cluster (0.820) districts, whereas the Local government type registered the lowest technical efficiency (0.468). Research Limitation/Implication: The projections for the Tec Innovation District’s output variables were obtained using a set of U.S. innovation districts due to the similarity of the studied region to the available group. The research allowed us to determine realistic outputs for the studied innovation district. Originality/Value of paper: The study employs an original DEA for comparing innovation districts and performs a bootstrap to study the system’s robustness; within this research, the performance level of a new district was calculated to be within a specific efficiency level, according to their peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信