阿根廷和西班牙环境问题的可信性/阿根廷环境问题可信性/ España

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Francisco J Sarabia-Sánchez, E. Bianchi
{"title":"阿根廷和西班牙环境问题的可信性/阿根廷环境问题可信性/ España","authors":"Francisco J Sarabia-Sánchez, E. Bianchi","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2019.1602338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyse the credibility of the content of the message and that of news stories about environmental problems, comparing the cases of Argentina and Spain. Its novel contribution is that it also analyses credibility according to the generation to which the informant belongs. In Argentina, information was compiled by means of an online survey (NArgentina = 450), whereas in Spain the same survey was conducted by interviewers (NSpain = 493). Low levels of credibility were found for the contents of messages about environmental problems and also for the news stories and narratives generated around them. Significant differences were noted between Argentina and Spain in relation to the credibility of the content of the message (which is greater in Argentina) but not in the credibility of news stories about environmental problems. In contrast to expectations, no generational differences were found in the two countries with regard to either type of credibility. This paper discusses the implications of the lack of generational segmentation as well as the low levels of credibility detected.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"19 1","pages":"344 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The credibility of environmental problems in Argentina and Spain/ La credibilidad de los problemas ambientales en Argentina y España\",\"authors\":\"Francisco J Sarabia-Sánchez, E. Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21711976.2019.1602338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyse the credibility of the content of the message and that of news stories about environmental problems, comparing the cases of Argentina and Spain. Its novel contribution is that it also analyses credibility according to the generation to which the informant belongs. In Argentina, information was compiled by means of an online survey (NArgentina = 450), whereas in Spain the same survey was conducted by interviewers (NSpain = 493). Low levels of credibility were found for the contents of messages about environmental problems and also for the news stories and narratives generated around them. Significant differences were noted between Argentina and Spain in relation to the credibility of the content of the message (which is greater in Argentina) but not in the credibility of news stories about environmental problems. In contrast to expectations, no generational differences were found in the two countries with regard to either type of credibility. This paper discusses the implications of the lack of generational segmentation as well as the low levels of credibility detected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"344 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1602338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1602338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是分析信息内容的可信度和关于环境问题的新闻报道,比较阿根廷和西班牙的情况。它的新颖之处在于,它还根据举报人所属的年代来分析可信度。在阿根廷,信息是通过在线调查的方式汇编的(阿根廷= 450),而在西班牙,同样的调查是由采访者进行的(西班牙= 493)。有关环境问题的信息内容以及围绕这些问题产生的新闻故事和叙述的可信度都很低。阿根廷和西班牙在信息内容的可信度方面存在显著差异(阿根廷的差异更大),但在关于环境问题的新闻报道的可信度方面没有显著差异。与预期相反,两国在这两种类型的可信度方面都没有发现代际差异。本文讨论了缺乏代际分割的影响,以及低水平的可信度检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The credibility of environmental problems in Argentina and Spain/ La credibilidad de los problemas ambientales en Argentina y España
Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyse the credibility of the content of the message and that of news stories about environmental problems, comparing the cases of Argentina and Spain. Its novel contribution is that it also analyses credibility according to the generation to which the informant belongs. In Argentina, information was compiled by means of an online survey (NArgentina = 450), whereas in Spain the same survey was conducted by interviewers (NSpain = 493). Low levels of credibility were found for the contents of messages about environmental problems and also for the news stories and narratives generated around them. Significant differences were noted between Argentina and Spain in relation to the credibility of the content of the message (which is greater in Argentina) but not in the credibility of news stories about environmental problems. In contrast to expectations, no generational differences were found in the two countries with regard to either type of credibility. This paper discusses the implications of the lack of generational segmentation as well as the low levels of credibility detected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信