确保帝国和自治的教育:1880年至1920年澳大利亚和新西兰奥特罗阿的公民教科书

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Julian Rawiri Kusabs
{"title":"确保帝国和自治的教育:1880年至1920年澳大利亚和新西兰奥特罗阿的公民教科书","authors":"Julian Rawiri Kusabs","doi":"10.1108/her-12-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeRecent trends in Western civics education have attempted to secure democratic institutions from perceived threats. This paper investigates how political securitisation historically operated within civics textbooks in Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand. It further evaluates how Māori, Aboriginal and other Indigenous peoples were variably incorporated or marginalised in these educational discourses.Design/methodology/approachThis discourse analysis evaluates a sample of civics textbooks circulated in Australia and New Zealand between 1880 and 1920. These historical sources are interpreted through theories of decoloniality and securitisation.FindingsThe sample of textbooks asserted to students that their self-governing colonies required the military protection of the British Empire against undemocratic “threats”. They argued that self-governing colonies strengthened the empire by raising subjects who were loyal to British military interests and ideological values. The authors pedagogically encouraged a governmentality within students that was complementary to military, imperial and democratic service. The hypocritical denial of self-government for many Indigenous peoples was rationalised as a measure of “security” against “native rule” and imperial rivals.Originality/valueUnder a lens of securitisation, the discursive links between imperialism, military service and democratic diligence have not yet been examined in civics textbooks from the historical contexts of Australia and New Zealand. This investigation provides conceptual and pedagogical insights for contemporary civics education in both nations.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education to secure empire and self-government: civics textbooks in Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand, from 1880 to 1920\",\"authors\":\"Julian Rawiri Kusabs\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/her-12-2022-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeRecent trends in Western civics education have attempted to secure democratic institutions from perceived threats. This paper investigates how political securitisation historically operated within civics textbooks in Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand. It further evaluates how Māori, Aboriginal and other Indigenous peoples were variably incorporated or marginalised in these educational discourses.Design/methodology/approachThis discourse analysis evaluates a sample of civics textbooks circulated in Australia and New Zealand between 1880 and 1920. These historical sources are interpreted through theories of decoloniality and securitisation.FindingsThe sample of textbooks asserted to students that their self-governing colonies required the military protection of the British Empire against undemocratic “threats”. They argued that self-governing colonies strengthened the empire by raising subjects who were loyal to British military interests and ideological values. The authors pedagogically encouraged a governmentality within students that was complementary to military, imperial and democratic service. The hypocritical denial of self-government for many Indigenous peoples was rationalised as a measure of “security” against “native rule” and imperial rivals.Originality/valueUnder a lens of securitisation, the discursive links between imperialism, military service and democratic diligence have not yet been examined in civics textbooks from the historical contexts of Australia and New Zealand. This investigation provides conceptual and pedagogical insights for contemporary civics education in both nations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-12-2022-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-12-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方公民教育最近的趋势试图确保民主制度不受威胁。本文研究了政治证券化在澳大利亚和新西兰的公民教科书中是如何在历史上运作的。它进一步评价Māori、土著和其他土著人民如何在这些教育话语中被不同地纳入或边缘化。本话语分析评估了1880年至1920年间在澳大利亚和新西兰流通的公民学教科书样本。这些历史渊源是通过去殖民化和证券化理论来解释的。这些教科书样本向学生们宣称,他们的自治殖民地需要大英帝国的军事保护,以抵御不民主的“威胁”。他们认为,自治殖民地通过培养忠于英国军事利益和意识形态价值观的臣民来加强帝国。作者在教学上鼓励学生的治理能力,这是对军事、帝国和民主服务的补充。许多土著人民虚伪地拒绝自治,被合理化为对抗“土著统治”和帝国对手的“安全”措施。原创性/价值在证券化的视角下,帝国主义、兵役和民主勤勉之间的话语联系尚未在澳大利亚和新西兰的历史背景下的公民教科书中得到检验。这项调查为两国当代公民教育提供了概念和教学上的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education to secure empire and self-government: civics textbooks in Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand, from 1880 to 1920
PurposeRecent trends in Western civics education have attempted to secure democratic institutions from perceived threats. This paper investigates how political securitisation historically operated within civics textbooks in Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand. It further evaluates how Māori, Aboriginal and other Indigenous peoples were variably incorporated or marginalised in these educational discourses.Design/methodology/approachThis discourse analysis evaluates a sample of civics textbooks circulated in Australia and New Zealand between 1880 and 1920. These historical sources are interpreted through theories of decoloniality and securitisation.FindingsThe sample of textbooks asserted to students that their self-governing colonies required the military protection of the British Empire against undemocratic “threats”. They argued that self-governing colonies strengthened the empire by raising subjects who were loyal to British military interests and ideological values. The authors pedagogically encouraged a governmentality within students that was complementary to military, imperial and democratic service. The hypocritical denial of self-government for many Indigenous peoples was rationalised as a measure of “security” against “native rule” and imperial rivals.Originality/valueUnder a lens of securitisation, the discursive links between imperialism, military service and democratic diligence have not yet been examined in civics textbooks from the historical contexts of Australia and New Zealand. This investigation provides conceptual and pedagogical insights for contemporary civics education in both nations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信