{"title":"面对分心的单致动器振动触觉数字信息传递","authors":"Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.","PeriodicalId":6702,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","volume":"109 1","pages":"461-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Actuator Vibrotactile Numeric Information Delivery in the Face of Distraction\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"461-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-Actuator Vibrotactile Numeric Information Delivery in the Face of Distraction
We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.