面对分心的单致动器振动触觉数字信息传递

Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock
{"title":"面对分心的单致动器振动触觉数字信息传递","authors":"Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.","PeriodicalId":6702,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","volume":"109 1","pages":"461-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Actuator Vibrotactile Numeric Information Delivery in the Face of Distraction\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey R. Blum, J. Cooperstock\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"461-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们测试了ActiVibe,这是一种之前报道过的用于在1到10之间传递数值的方法,以确定它在反映更具挑战性的潜在现实用例的条件下是否仍然是最佳的。因此,我们将振动触觉通信与音频干扰任务结合在一起,并且在连续传递不止一个,而是三个数值时。一项比较三种不同呈现方法的用户研究结果表明,与两种不同的基于持续时间的呈现方法相比,ActiVibe在呈现单个值时保持了准确性和主观偏好优势,但在呈现三个连续值时,这些优势在很大程度上失去了。在类似于我们测试的最困难的条件下,对于某些应用程序来说,更简洁的仅持续时间的方法可能更可取,因为它需要更少的功耗和更少的总时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Actuator Vibrotactile Numeric Information Delivery in the Face of Distraction
We test ActiVibe, a previously reported method for communicating numeric values between 1 and 10, to determine whether it remains optimal under conditions reflective of more challenging potential real-world use cases. We thus consider vibrotactile communication in conjunction with an audio distractor task, and when conveying not just one, but three numeric values in succession. Results of a user study comparing three different rendering methods indicate that ActiVibe maintains both accuracy and subjective preference advantages vs. two different duration-based methods when conveying a single value, but largely loses these advantages when presenting three sequential values. Under conditions similar to the most difficult ones we test, a more concise duration-only approach may be preferable for some applications, requiring less power consumption and demanding attention for less total time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信