《因为他不在这里》:伊迪丝·沃顿对来世、鬼魂和信仰艺术的研究

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Yuki Miyazawa
{"title":"《因为他不在这里》:伊迪丝·沃顿对来世、鬼魂和信仰艺术的研究","authors":"Yuki Miyazawa","doi":"10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.1.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In her writings about ghost stories, Edith Wharton points out the importance of believing consciously in ghosts in order to enjoy the stories, but it seems that Wharton uses the genre to say something more about belief. Through her ghost stories, Wharton, though she generally emphasizes rationality, places herself between the rational and the irrational, a space where something or someone \"not here\" could be technically \"here.\" In this respect, Wharton makes her ghost stories a space to speculate on metaphysical questions which, in the context of William James's philosophy of religion and late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century spiritualism, was often regarded as irrational. In \"The Fulness of Life,\" Wharton assumes the afterlife as fact and searches for the possibility of settling difficult earthly matters in the world of the dead. Later, in \"Mr. Jones,\" she seeks the possible path of literary afterlife through the ghost figure and through allusions to dead authors like Edgar Allan Poe. Finally, in \"The Looking-Glass,\" Wharton combines themes from earlier stories, presenting a character who mediates between true and false spiritualism and between spiritualism and Catholicism.","PeriodicalId":40904,"journal":{"name":"Edith Wharton Review","volume":"79 1","pages":"47 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Because He's Not Here\\\": Edith Wharton's Study in the Afterlife, Ghosts, and the Art of Belief\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Miyazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.1.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In her writings about ghost stories, Edith Wharton points out the importance of believing consciously in ghosts in order to enjoy the stories, but it seems that Wharton uses the genre to say something more about belief. Through her ghost stories, Wharton, though she generally emphasizes rationality, places herself between the rational and the irrational, a space where something or someone \\\"not here\\\" could be technically \\\"here.\\\" In this respect, Wharton makes her ghost stories a space to speculate on metaphysical questions which, in the context of William James's philosophy of religion and late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century spiritualism, was often regarded as irrational. In \\\"The Fulness of Life,\\\" Wharton assumes the afterlife as fact and searches for the possibility of settling difficult earthly matters in the world of the dead. Later, in \\\"Mr. Jones,\\\" she seeks the possible path of literary afterlife through the ghost figure and through allusions to dead authors like Edgar Allan Poe. Finally, in \\\"The Looking-Glass,\\\" Wharton combines themes from earlier stories, presenting a character who mediates between true and false spiritualism and between spiritualism and Catholicism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.1.0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edith Wharton Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.1.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:伊迪丝·华顿在其鬼故事写作中指出了为了欣赏鬼故事而自觉相信鬼的重要性,但华顿似乎更倾向于用这种类型来表达信仰。通过她的鬼故事,沃顿虽然通常强调理性,但她把自己置于理性和非理性之间,在这个空间里,“不在这里”的东西或人可能在技术上“在这里”。在这方面,沃顿让她的鬼故事成为思考形而上学问题的空间,在威廉·詹姆斯的宗教哲学和19世纪末和20世纪初的唯灵论的背景下,这些问题通常被认为是非理性的。在《生命的充实》一书中,沃顿将来世视为事实,并寻求在死者的世界中解决世俗难题的可能性。后来,在《琼斯先生》中,她通过鬼魂形象和埃德加·爱伦·坡(Edgar Allan Poe)等已故作家的典故,寻找文学来世的可能路径。最后,在《镜中奇事》中,沃顿结合了早期故事的主题,呈现了一个介于真假唯灵论、唯灵论与天主教之间的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Because He's Not Here": Edith Wharton's Study in the Afterlife, Ghosts, and the Art of Belief
Abstract:In her writings about ghost stories, Edith Wharton points out the importance of believing consciously in ghosts in order to enjoy the stories, but it seems that Wharton uses the genre to say something more about belief. Through her ghost stories, Wharton, though she generally emphasizes rationality, places herself between the rational and the irrational, a space where something or someone "not here" could be technically "here." In this respect, Wharton makes her ghost stories a space to speculate on metaphysical questions which, in the context of William James's philosophy of religion and late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century spiritualism, was often regarded as irrational. In "The Fulness of Life," Wharton assumes the afterlife as fact and searches for the possibility of settling difficult earthly matters in the world of the dead. Later, in "Mr. Jones," she seeks the possible path of literary afterlife through the ghost figure and through allusions to dead authors like Edgar Allan Poe. Finally, in "The Looking-Glass," Wharton combines themes from earlier stories, presenting a character who mediates between true and false spiritualism and between spiritualism and Catholicism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Edith Wharton Review
Edith Wharton Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信