通过合成符号执行进行Android测试

Xiang Gao, Shin Hwei Tan, Zhen Dong, Abhik Roychoudhury
{"title":"通过合成符号执行进行Android测试","authors":"Xiang Gao, Shin Hwei Tan, Zhen Dong, Abhik Roychoudhury","doi":"10.1145/3238147.3238225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Symbolic execution of Android applications is challenging as it involves either building a customized VM for Android or modeling the Android libraries. Since the Android Runtime evolves from one version to another, building a high-fidelity symbolic execution engine involves modeling the effect of the libraries and their evolved versions. Without simulating the behavior of Android libraries, path divergence may occur due to constraint loss when the symbolic values flow into Android framework and these values later affect the subsequent path taken. Previous works such as JPF-Android have relied on the modeling of execution environment such as libraries. In this work, we build a dynamic symbolic execution engine for Android apps, without any manual modeling of execution environment. Environment (or library) dependent control flow decisions in the application will trigger an on-demand program synthesis step to automatically deduce a representation of the library. This representation is refined on-the-fly by running the corresponding library multiple times. The overarching goal of the refinement is to enhance behavioral coverage and to alleviate the path divergence problem during symbolic execution. Moreover, our library synthesis can be made context-specific. Compared to traditional synthesis approaches which aim to synthesize the complete library code, our context-specific synthesis engine can generate more precise expressions for a given context. The evaluation of our dynamic symbolic execution engine, built on top of JDART, shows that the library models obtained from program synthesis are often more accurate than the semi-manual models in JPF-Android. Furthermore, our symbolic execution engine could reach more branch targets, as compared to using the JPF-Android models.","PeriodicalId":6622,"journal":{"name":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"67 1","pages":"419-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Android Testing via Synthetic Symbolic Execution\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Gao, Shin Hwei Tan, Zhen Dong, Abhik Roychoudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3238147.3238225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Symbolic execution of Android applications is challenging as it involves either building a customized VM for Android or modeling the Android libraries. Since the Android Runtime evolves from one version to another, building a high-fidelity symbolic execution engine involves modeling the effect of the libraries and their evolved versions. Without simulating the behavior of Android libraries, path divergence may occur due to constraint loss when the symbolic values flow into Android framework and these values later affect the subsequent path taken. Previous works such as JPF-Android have relied on the modeling of execution environment such as libraries. In this work, we build a dynamic symbolic execution engine for Android apps, without any manual modeling of execution environment. Environment (or library) dependent control flow decisions in the application will trigger an on-demand program synthesis step to automatically deduce a representation of the library. This representation is refined on-the-fly by running the corresponding library multiple times. The overarching goal of the refinement is to enhance behavioral coverage and to alleviate the path divergence problem during symbolic execution. Moreover, our library synthesis can be made context-specific. Compared to traditional synthesis approaches which aim to synthesize the complete library code, our context-specific synthesis engine can generate more precise expressions for a given context. The evaluation of our dynamic symbolic execution engine, built on top of JDART, shows that the library models obtained from program synthesis are often more accurate than the semi-manual models in JPF-Android. Furthermore, our symbolic execution engine could reach more branch targets, as compared to using the JPF-Android models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"419-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

Android应用程序的符号执行是具有挑战性的,因为它涉及到为Android构建定制的VM或对Android库进行建模。由于Android运行时从一个版本演变到另一个版本,构建一个高保真的符号执行引擎涉及到对库及其演变版本的效果进行建模。如果不模拟Android库的行为,当符号值流入Android框架时,可能会由于约束损失而产生路径发散,这些值随后会影响后续的路径。以前的作品,如JPF-Android,都依赖于对执行环境(如库)的建模。在这项工作中,我们为Android应用程序构建了一个动态符号执行引擎,而无需手动建模执行环境。应用程序中依赖于环境(或库)的控制流决策将触发按需程序合成步骤,以自动推导库的表示。这种表示通过多次运行相应的库来实时改进。细化的首要目标是增强行为覆盖,并减轻符号执行期间的路径发散问题。此外,我们的库合成可以根据具体情况进行。与传统的旨在合成完整库代码的合成方法相比,我们的上下文特定合成引擎可以为给定的上下文生成更精确的表达式。对基于jart构建的动态符号执行引擎的评估表明,通过程序合成获得的库模型通常比JPF-Android中的半手动模型更准确。此外,与使用JPF-Android模型相比,我们的符号执行引擎可以达到更多的分支目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Android Testing via Synthetic Symbolic Execution
Symbolic execution of Android applications is challenging as it involves either building a customized VM for Android or modeling the Android libraries. Since the Android Runtime evolves from one version to another, building a high-fidelity symbolic execution engine involves modeling the effect of the libraries and their evolved versions. Without simulating the behavior of Android libraries, path divergence may occur due to constraint loss when the symbolic values flow into Android framework and these values later affect the subsequent path taken. Previous works such as JPF-Android have relied on the modeling of execution environment such as libraries. In this work, we build a dynamic symbolic execution engine for Android apps, without any manual modeling of execution environment. Environment (or library) dependent control flow decisions in the application will trigger an on-demand program synthesis step to automatically deduce a representation of the library. This representation is refined on-the-fly by running the corresponding library multiple times. The overarching goal of the refinement is to enhance behavioral coverage and to alleviate the path divergence problem during symbolic execution. Moreover, our library synthesis can be made context-specific. Compared to traditional synthesis approaches which aim to synthesize the complete library code, our context-specific synthesis engine can generate more precise expressions for a given context. The evaluation of our dynamic symbolic execution engine, built on top of JDART, shows that the library models obtained from program synthesis are often more accurate than the semi-manual models in JPF-Android. Furthermore, our symbolic execution engine could reach more branch targets, as compared to using the JPF-Android models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信