已探明储量的相对信息含量:boe -revenue vs . boe -energy

Kevin T. Berry, Tanweer Hasan, David O'Bryan
{"title":"已探明储量的相对信息含量:boe -revenue vs . boe -energy","authors":"Kevin T. Berry,&nbsp;Tanweer Hasan,&nbsp;David O'Bryan","doi":"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80064-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are two methods to combine oil and gas reserve quantities and values, an energy-based conversion method and a revenue-based conversion method. Prior academic research on the valuation of reserve quantities has used the energy-based conversion method, but he validity of the energy-based conversion has been questioned in the accounting literature (Lys, 1986; Koester, 1993). The purpose of this study was to examine whether total proven reserves calculated using a revenue-based conversion method was more value-relevant than total proven reserves calculated using an energy-based conversion method. The research hypothesis was tested with two methods, each using a pooled, cross-sectional (panel data) sample of 399 film-years from the Arthur Andersen Oil and Gas Reserve Disclosure Database 1989–1993. The empirical results provided no support for the hypothesis that a revenue-based conversion method was superior to an evergy-based conversion method for valuation purposes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80064-7","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative information content of proven reserves: The BOEs-revenue versus BOEs-energy\",\"authors\":\"Kevin T. Berry,&nbsp;Tanweer Hasan,&nbsp;David O'Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80064-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are two methods to combine oil and gas reserve quantities and values, an energy-based conversion method and a revenue-based conversion method. Prior academic research on the valuation of reserve quantities has used the energy-based conversion method, but he validity of the energy-based conversion has been questioned in the accounting literature (Lys, 1986; Koester, 1993). The purpose of this study was to examine whether total proven reserves calculated using a revenue-based conversion method was more value-relevant than total proven reserves calculated using an energy-based conversion method. The research hypothesis was tested with two methods, each using a pooled, cross-sectional (panel data) sample of 399 film-years from the Arthur Andersen Oil and Gas Reserve Disclosure Database 1989–1993. The empirical results provided no support for the hypothesis that a revenue-based conversion method was superior to an evergy-based conversion method for valuation purposes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80064-7\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399800647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399800647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

油气储量和储量价值的组合方法有两种,一种是基于能量的转换方法,另一种是基于收益的转换方法。之前的学术研究对储量的估值使用了基于能量的转换方法,但基于能量的转换的有效性在会计文献中受到质疑(Lys, 1986;凯斯特,1993)。本研究的目的是检验使用基于收入的转换方法计算的总探明储量是否比使用基于能量的转换方法计算的总探明储量更具价值相关性。研究假设用两种方法进行了检验,每种方法都使用了Arthur Andersen 1989-1993年油气储量披露数据库中399个电影年的汇总横截面(面板数据)样本。实证结果不支持基于收入的转换方法优于基于每个人的估值转换方法的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative information content of proven reserves: The BOEs-revenue versus BOEs-energy

There are two methods to combine oil and gas reserve quantities and values, an energy-based conversion method and a revenue-based conversion method. Prior academic research on the valuation of reserve quantities has used the energy-based conversion method, but he validity of the energy-based conversion has been questioned in the accounting literature (Lys, 1986; Koester, 1993). The purpose of this study was to examine whether total proven reserves calculated using a revenue-based conversion method was more value-relevant than total proven reserves calculated using an energy-based conversion method. The research hypothesis was tested with two methods, each using a pooled, cross-sectional (panel data) sample of 399 film-years from the Arthur Andersen Oil and Gas Reserve Disclosure Database 1989–1993. The empirical results provided no support for the hypothesis that a revenue-based conversion method was superior to an evergy-based conversion method for valuation purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信