导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的研究:安得拉邦一家三级护理医院的发病率和微生物谱

Sreedevi Hanumantha, Hema Prakash Pilli
{"title":"导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的研究:安得拉邦一家三级护理医院的发病率和微生物谱","authors":"Sreedevi Hanumantha, Hema Prakash Pilli","doi":"10.9734/bpi/imb/v1/11884d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The etiological agents of Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are sundry and often multidrug resistant. An early, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on culture sensitivity report and implementation of infection control practices together play a key role in management of CAUTI. Objectives: 1. To find the incidence of CAUTI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 2. To identify etiological agents responsible for CAUTI. 3. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for bacterial agents obtained. Methods: Urine samples from clinically suspected cases of CAUTI were obtained from patients with urinary catheters admitted in ICUs. Urine samples were subjected to wet mount, culture and sensitivity testing. Responsible pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern were obtained based on CSLI standards. Results: A total of 640 patients were having indwelling urinary catheter with an aggregate of 5199 catheter days over a period of 6 months. 19 were culture positive out of 45 clinically suspected cases of CAUTI. The CAUTI rate was 3.65 cases per 1000 catheter days. Most predominant etiological agents responsible for CAUTI were Citrobacter species (26.3%) followed by P.aeruginosa (21.1%) and E. coli (21.1%). 2(18.2%) ESBL producing Gram negative bacteriawere obtained among Enterobacteriaciae. The most effective antibiotics were ceftazidime/clavulinic acid, colistin and meropenam for Enterobacteriaciae; piperacillin/tazobactam for P.aeruginosa; linezolid and vancomycin for Enterococcus species. Introduction Nosocomial infections, or hospital-acquired infections (HAI), are important cause of morbidity and mortality in healthcare settings especially among patients admitted in intensive care units(ICUs). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 20-50% of all hospital-acquired infections occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Urinary catheterization in itself is a risk factor for Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTI as defined by CDC is an UTI where an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days on the date of event, with day of device placement being Day 1, and an indwelling urinary catheter was in place on the date of event or the day before. If an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days and then removed, the date of event for the UTI must be the day of discontinuation or the next day for the UTI to be catheter-associated. Culture positivity is the said event. Several bacterial species are known to form biofilm on urinary catheters as a survival benefit. The most common pathogens of CAUTI include Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species and Candida albicans. Both the microbiological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern vary considerably from time to time and region to region. CAUTI is coupled with prolonged hospital stay among patients and considerable financial burden to both patients and hospitals. Pooled mean CAUTI rate was 0 to 4 per 1000 catheter days as given by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report of U.S.A. Inappropriate and recurrent use of antibiotics to treat CAUTI, can promote antimicrobial resistance. Therefore evidence based diagnosis of CAUTI and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on microbiological test results is necessary in ICU settings. Materials and Methods The present study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh for a period of 6 months (January 2016 to June 2016). It is a prospective study approved by institutional ethical committee. A total of 640 patients admitted in ICUs were catheterized with indwelling urinary catheter (Foley’s catheter) during the study period. Urinary catheter care bundle was implemented among all catheterized patients as per Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines. Follow up of catheterized patients was done meticulously on daily basis and observed for local and systemic signs of UTI. On clinical suspicion of UTI in catheterized patients, urine sample was sent to microbiology laboratory along with prompt documentation. Culture positivity obtained in less than 2 calendar days of urinary catheterization was not considered as CAUTI. Sample collection: Fresh urine samples were collected in a sterile, leak-proof universal container from patients under aseptic technique from sampling port of sterile closed urinary drainage system which was transported to the microbiology laboratory for immediate processing. Sreedevi Hanumantha et al. Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) Indian J Microbiol Res 2016;3(4):454-457 455 Processing of specimens in laboratory: The urine samples were subjected to direct wet mount and culture using semi-quantitative standard loop technique. Inoculation was done on Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient medium (CLED) and blood agar. Significant count was considered. Discrete bacterial isolates thus obtained were subjected to Gram staining, hanging drop preparation, other necessary tests including biochemical tests for further identification. The species identification of bacterial and fungal isolates was done based on standard laboratory procedures. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was adopted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using appropriate antimicrobial discs as per CLSI guidelines. Results Indwelling urinary catheter was used in 640 patients admitted in ICUs with catheter days ranging from 5-10 catheter days on an average for each patient. A sum total of 5199 catheter days were obtained in the study period. 45(7.03%) patients developed clinical signs or symptoms of UTI after 2 calendar days from the time of insertion of indwelling urinary catheter. Of 45 urine samples cultured, 19(42.2%) were culture positive and 26(57.8%) showed no evidence of growth. Incidence of CAUTI was 3.65 per 1000 catheter days over a 6 month period. Single significant pathogen with colony count of more than 100000 colony forming units was obtained from each culture positive sample. Table 1: Spectrum of isolates obtained in CAUTI Sl no. Organism No. of isolates 1 Citrobacter species 5 2 Pseudomonas aeroginosa 4","PeriodicalId":13595,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 1","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI): Incidence and Microbiological Profile in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Andhra Pradesh\",\"authors\":\"Sreedevi Hanumantha, Hema Prakash Pilli\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/imb/v1/11884d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The etiological agents of Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are sundry and often multidrug resistant. An early, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on culture sensitivity report and implementation of infection control practices together play a key role in management of CAUTI. Objectives: 1. To find the incidence of CAUTI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 2. To identify etiological agents responsible for CAUTI. 3. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for bacterial agents obtained. Methods: Urine samples from clinically suspected cases of CAUTI were obtained from patients with urinary catheters admitted in ICUs. Urine samples were subjected to wet mount, culture and sensitivity testing. Responsible pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern were obtained based on CSLI standards. Results: A total of 640 patients were having indwelling urinary catheter with an aggregate of 5199 catheter days over a period of 6 months. 19 were culture positive out of 45 clinically suspected cases of CAUTI. The CAUTI rate was 3.65 cases per 1000 catheter days. Most predominant etiological agents responsible for CAUTI were Citrobacter species (26.3%) followed by P.aeruginosa (21.1%) and E. coli (21.1%). 2(18.2%) ESBL producing Gram negative bacteriawere obtained among Enterobacteriaciae. The most effective antibiotics were ceftazidime/clavulinic acid, colistin and meropenam for Enterobacteriaciae; piperacillin/tazobactam for P.aeruginosa; linezolid and vancomycin for Enterococcus species. Introduction Nosocomial infections, or hospital-acquired infections (HAI), are important cause of morbidity and mortality in healthcare settings especially among patients admitted in intensive care units(ICUs). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 20-50% of all hospital-acquired infections occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Urinary catheterization in itself is a risk factor for Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTI as defined by CDC is an UTI where an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days on the date of event, with day of device placement being Day 1, and an indwelling urinary catheter was in place on the date of event or the day before. If an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days and then removed, the date of event for the UTI must be the day of discontinuation or the next day for the UTI to be catheter-associated. Culture positivity is the said event. Several bacterial species are known to form biofilm on urinary catheters as a survival benefit. The most common pathogens of CAUTI include Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species and Candida albicans. Both the microbiological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern vary considerably from time to time and region to region. CAUTI is coupled with prolonged hospital stay among patients and considerable financial burden to both patients and hospitals. Pooled mean CAUTI rate was 0 to 4 per 1000 catheter days as given by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report of U.S.A. Inappropriate and recurrent use of antibiotics to treat CAUTI, can promote antimicrobial resistance. Therefore evidence based diagnosis of CAUTI and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on microbiological test results is necessary in ICU settings. Materials and Methods The present study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh for a period of 6 months (January 2016 to June 2016). It is a prospective study approved by institutional ethical committee. A total of 640 patients admitted in ICUs were catheterized with indwelling urinary catheter (Foley’s catheter) during the study period. Urinary catheter care bundle was implemented among all catheterized patients as per Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines. Follow up of catheterized patients was done meticulously on daily basis and observed for local and systemic signs of UTI. On clinical suspicion of UTI in catheterized patients, urine sample was sent to microbiology laboratory along with prompt documentation. Culture positivity obtained in less than 2 calendar days of urinary catheterization was not considered as CAUTI. Sample collection: Fresh urine samples were collected in a sterile, leak-proof universal container from patients under aseptic technique from sampling port of sterile closed urinary drainage system which was transported to the microbiology laboratory for immediate processing. Sreedevi Hanumantha et al. Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) Indian J Microbiol Res 2016;3(4):454-457 455 Processing of specimens in laboratory: The urine samples were subjected to direct wet mount and culture using semi-quantitative standard loop technique. Inoculation was done on Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient medium (CLED) and blood agar. Significant count was considered. Discrete bacterial isolates thus obtained were subjected to Gram staining, hanging drop preparation, other necessary tests including biochemical tests for further identification. The species identification of bacterial and fungal isolates was done based on standard laboratory procedures. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was adopted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using appropriate antimicrobial discs as per CLSI guidelines. Results Indwelling urinary catheter was used in 640 patients admitted in ICUs with catheter days ranging from 5-10 catheter days on an average for each patient. A sum total of 5199 catheter days were obtained in the study period. 45(7.03%) patients developed clinical signs or symptoms of UTI after 2 calendar days from the time of insertion of indwelling urinary catheter. Of 45 urine samples cultured, 19(42.2%) were culture positive and 26(57.8%) showed no evidence of growth. Incidence of CAUTI was 3.65 per 1000 catheter days over a 6 month period. Single significant pathogen with colony count of more than 100000 colony forming units was obtained from each culture positive sample. Table 1: Spectrum of isolates obtained in CAUTI Sl no. Organism No. of isolates 1 Citrobacter species 5 2 Pseudomonas aeroginosa 4\",\"PeriodicalId\":13595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 1\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/imb/v1/11884d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/imb/v1/11884d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)的病因是多种多样的,往往是多重耐药的。基于培养敏感性报告和感染控制实践的早期,适当的抗菌药物治疗在CAUTI的管理中起着关键作用。目的:1。目的了解重症监护病房(ICU)患者CAUTI的发生率。2. 确定引起CAUTI的病原。3.目的:确定所得细菌药物的药敏模式。方法:从icu留置导尿管的临床疑似CAUTI患者取尿样。尿样进行湿载、培养和敏感性测试。根据CSLI标准获得病原菌及其药敏模式。结果:共640例患者留置导尿,6个月时间累计5199天。45例临床疑似CAUTI病例中,培养阳性19例。CAUTI率为3.65例/ 1000 d。造成CAUTI的主要病原是柠檬酸杆菌(26.3%),其次是铜绿假单胞菌(21.1%)和大肠杆菌(21.1%)。产ESBL的革兰氏阴性菌2株(18.2%);肠杆菌科最有效的抗生素为头孢他啶/克拉维酸、粘菌素和美罗南;哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗铜绿假单胞菌;利奈唑胺和万古霉素用于肠球菌。医院感染或医院获得性感染(HAI)是卫生保健机构中发病率和死亡率的重要原因,特别是在重症监护病房(icu)住院的患者中。尿路感染(uti)占所有发生在重症监护病房(ICU)的医院获得性感染的20-50%。导尿本身是导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)的危险因素。CDC定义的CAUTI是指在事件发生之日留置导尿管放置时间超过2个日历日的尿路感染,其中放置装置的当天为第1天,并且在事件发生之日或前一天留置导尿管。如果留置导尿管放置超过2个日历日,然后取出,则尿路感染事件的日期必须是停置当日或尿路感染与导尿管相关的第二天。文化积极性就是上述事件。已知有几种细菌会在导尿管上形成生物膜,从而有利于生存。CAUTI最常见的病原体包括大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肠球菌和白色念珠菌。微生物谱和抗菌素敏感性模式随时间和地区而有很大差异。CAUTI与患者住院时间延长相结合,对患者和医院都造成了相当大的经济负担。根据美国国家卫生保健安全网络(NHSN)报告,合并平均CAUTI发生率为0 ~ 4 / 1000导管天,不适当和反复使用抗生素治疗CAUTI可促进抗菌药物耐药性。因此,在ICU环境中,基于证据的CAUTI诊断和根据微生物学检测结果开始适当的抗菌治疗是必要的。材料与方法本研究在安得拉邦维萨卡帕特南的一家三级医院进行,为期6个月(2016年1月至2016年6月)。本研究是经机构伦理委员会批准的前瞻性研究。研究期间共有640例icu患者行留置导尿(Foley导尿)。根据医疗感染控制实践咨询委员会(HICPAC)指南,在所有导尿患者中实施尿管护理包。每天对置管患者进行细致的随访,观察尿路感染的局部和全身体征。对临床怀疑尿路感染的患者,及时将尿样送到微生物实验室并记录在案。导尿少于2天的培养阳性不视为CAUTI。标本采集:无菌技术患者的新鲜尿液标本从无菌闭式尿引流系统取样口采集,装入无菌、防漏的通用容器,运送至微生物实验室立即处理。Sreedevi Hanumantha等人。导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI) [J] .中华微生物学杂志,2016;3(4):454-457 455实验室标本处理:采用半定量标准环技术直接湿载培养。接种于胱氨酸乳糖电解质缺乏培养基(ced)和血琼脂上。考虑了显著计数。 这样获得的分离细菌分离物进行革兰氏染色,挂滴制备,其他必要的测试,包括进一步鉴定的生化测试。细菌和真菌分离物的种类鉴定是根据标准实验室程序进行的。采用Kirby-Bauer片扩散法进行药敏试验,按照CLSI指南选用合适的抗菌片。结果640例icu住院患者采用留置导尿,平均每位患者留置导尿天数为5 ~ 10天。研究期间共使用导管5199天。45例(7.03%)患者在留置导尿2天后出现尿路感染的临床体征或症状。45份尿样中,培养阳性19份(42.2%),无生长迹象26份(57.8%)。在6个月期间,CAUTI的发生率为3.65 / 1000导管天。从每个培养阳性样品中获得单个显著病原菌,菌落形成单位大于100000个。表1:CAUTI Sl no. 1菌株谱。生物没有。分离物1种柠檬酸杆菌5种2种铜绿假单胞菌4种
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI): Incidence and Microbiological Profile in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Andhra Pradesh
Background: The etiological agents of Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are sundry and often multidrug resistant. An early, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on culture sensitivity report and implementation of infection control practices together play a key role in management of CAUTI. Objectives: 1. To find the incidence of CAUTI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 2. To identify etiological agents responsible for CAUTI. 3. To determine antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for bacterial agents obtained. Methods: Urine samples from clinically suspected cases of CAUTI were obtained from patients with urinary catheters admitted in ICUs. Urine samples were subjected to wet mount, culture and sensitivity testing. Responsible pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern were obtained based on CSLI standards. Results: A total of 640 patients were having indwelling urinary catheter with an aggregate of 5199 catheter days over a period of 6 months. 19 were culture positive out of 45 clinically suspected cases of CAUTI. The CAUTI rate was 3.65 cases per 1000 catheter days. Most predominant etiological agents responsible for CAUTI were Citrobacter species (26.3%) followed by P.aeruginosa (21.1%) and E. coli (21.1%). 2(18.2%) ESBL producing Gram negative bacteriawere obtained among Enterobacteriaciae. The most effective antibiotics were ceftazidime/clavulinic acid, colistin and meropenam for Enterobacteriaciae; piperacillin/tazobactam for P.aeruginosa; linezolid and vancomycin for Enterococcus species. Introduction Nosocomial infections, or hospital-acquired infections (HAI), are important cause of morbidity and mortality in healthcare settings especially among patients admitted in intensive care units(ICUs). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 20-50% of all hospital-acquired infections occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Urinary catheterization in itself is a risk factor for Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTI as defined by CDC is an UTI where an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days on the date of event, with day of device placement being Day 1, and an indwelling urinary catheter was in place on the date of event or the day before. If an indwelling urinary catheter was in place for more than 2 calendar days and then removed, the date of event for the UTI must be the day of discontinuation or the next day for the UTI to be catheter-associated. Culture positivity is the said event. Several bacterial species are known to form biofilm on urinary catheters as a survival benefit. The most common pathogens of CAUTI include Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species and Candida albicans. Both the microbiological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern vary considerably from time to time and region to region. CAUTI is coupled with prolonged hospital stay among patients and considerable financial burden to both patients and hospitals. Pooled mean CAUTI rate was 0 to 4 per 1000 catheter days as given by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report of U.S.A. Inappropriate and recurrent use of antibiotics to treat CAUTI, can promote antimicrobial resistance. Therefore evidence based diagnosis of CAUTI and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on microbiological test results is necessary in ICU settings. Materials and Methods The present study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh for a period of 6 months (January 2016 to June 2016). It is a prospective study approved by institutional ethical committee. A total of 640 patients admitted in ICUs were catheterized with indwelling urinary catheter (Foley’s catheter) during the study period. Urinary catheter care bundle was implemented among all catheterized patients as per Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines. Follow up of catheterized patients was done meticulously on daily basis and observed for local and systemic signs of UTI. On clinical suspicion of UTI in catheterized patients, urine sample was sent to microbiology laboratory along with prompt documentation. Culture positivity obtained in less than 2 calendar days of urinary catheterization was not considered as CAUTI. Sample collection: Fresh urine samples were collected in a sterile, leak-proof universal container from patients under aseptic technique from sampling port of sterile closed urinary drainage system which was transported to the microbiology laboratory for immediate processing. Sreedevi Hanumantha et al. Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) Indian J Microbiol Res 2016;3(4):454-457 455 Processing of specimens in laboratory: The urine samples were subjected to direct wet mount and culture using semi-quantitative standard loop technique. Inoculation was done on Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient medium (CLED) and blood agar. Significant count was considered. Discrete bacterial isolates thus obtained were subjected to Gram staining, hanging drop preparation, other necessary tests including biochemical tests for further identification. The species identification of bacterial and fungal isolates was done based on standard laboratory procedures. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was adopted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using appropriate antimicrobial discs as per CLSI guidelines. Results Indwelling urinary catheter was used in 640 patients admitted in ICUs with catheter days ranging from 5-10 catheter days on an average for each patient. A sum total of 5199 catheter days were obtained in the study period. 45(7.03%) patients developed clinical signs or symptoms of UTI after 2 calendar days from the time of insertion of indwelling urinary catheter. Of 45 urine samples cultured, 19(42.2%) were culture positive and 26(57.8%) showed no evidence of growth. Incidence of CAUTI was 3.65 per 1000 catheter days over a 6 month period. Single significant pathogen with colony count of more than 100000 colony forming units was obtained from each culture positive sample. Table 1: Spectrum of isolates obtained in CAUTI Sl no. Organism No. of isolates 1 Citrobacter species 5 2 Pseudomonas aeroginosa 4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信