{"title":"传统切开痔切除术与缝合痔切除术疗效比较","authors":"Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain","doi":"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. \nObjective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. \nResults: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). \nConclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation\",\"authors\":\"Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. \\nObjective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. \\nResults: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). \\nConclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. \\nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104\",\"PeriodicalId\":33248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation
Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy.
Objective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant.
Results: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001).
Conclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy.
Journal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104