动静脉瘘患者近端静脉流出梗阻的血管内治疗:我们的单中心经验

S. Ömür
{"title":"动静脉瘘患者近端静脉流出梗阻的血管内治疗:我们的单中心经验","authors":"S. Ömür","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study, we present our early and mid-term results of percutaneous treatment for proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO). Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and July 2019, a total of 40 patients (19 males, 21 females; mean age: 61.9±12.1 years; range, 49 to 74 years) who underwent hemodialysis from the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were included. All patients had advanced edema due to PVOO in the extremity with AVF. All patients received endovascular treatment for PVOO. Results: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed to all patients. Stent implantation was performed in 20 patients who could not achieve full patency after PTA. A patient whose edema did not regress despite stent implantation underwent surgical AVF recreation. A total of six patients underwent minor/major surgical procedures. In 14 patients, edema completely regressed and the functionality of the fistula increased in the one-month follow-up after the PTA procedure. The patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24-months of follow-up, and primary patency rates were found to be 92%, 82%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PVOO should not be overlooked in patients with AVF, edema in the extremity, and no loss of fistula functionality. Percutaneous interventions should be considered primarily in the treatment of PVOO.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular treatment of proximal venous outflow obstructions in patients with arteriovenous fistula: Our single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"S. Ömür\",\"doi\":\"10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: In this study, we present our early and mid-term results of percutaneous treatment for proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO). Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and July 2019, a total of 40 patients (19 males, 21 females; mean age: 61.9±12.1 years; range, 49 to 74 years) who underwent hemodialysis from the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were included. All patients had advanced edema due to PVOO in the extremity with AVF. All patients received endovascular treatment for PVOO. Results: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed to all patients. Stent implantation was performed in 20 patients who could not achieve full patency after PTA. A patient whose edema did not regress despite stent implantation underwent surgical AVF recreation. A total of six patients underwent minor/major surgical procedures. In 14 patients, edema completely regressed and the functionality of the fistula increased in the one-month follow-up after the PTA procedure. The patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24-months of follow-up, and primary patency rates were found to be 92%, 82%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PVOO should not be overlooked in patients with AVF, edema in the extremity, and no loss of fistula functionality. Percutaneous interventions should be considered primarily in the treatment of PVOO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们报告了经皮治疗近端静脉流出梗阻(PVOO)的早期和中期结果。患者与方法:2017年1月- 2019年7月,共40例患者(男19例,女21例;平均年龄:61.9±12.1岁;范围49 - 74岁),包括因动静脉瘘(AVF)而接受血液透析的患者。所有患者均因AVF的下肢PVOO而出现晚期水肿。所有患者均接受血管内治疗。结果:所有患者均行经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)。20例PTA术后不能完全通畅的患者行支架植入术。患者的水肿没有消退,尽管支架植入手术AVF重建。共有6名患者接受了小/大手术。14例患者在PTA手术后1个月的随访中,水肿完全消退,瘘管功能增强。接受经皮介入治疗的患者分别在随访3、6、12和24个月时进行评估,发现原发性通畅率分别为92%、82%、67%和45%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在AVF、四肢水肿和无瘘功能丧失的患者中,PVOO不应被忽视。经皮介入治疗应主要考虑PVOO的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular treatment of proximal venous outflow obstructions in patients with arteriovenous fistula: Our single-center experience
Objectives: In this study, we present our early and mid-term results of percutaneous treatment for proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO). Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and July 2019, a total of 40 patients (19 males, 21 females; mean age: 61.9±12.1 years; range, 49 to 74 years) who underwent hemodialysis from the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were included. All patients had advanced edema due to PVOO in the extremity with AVF. All patients received endovascular treatment for PVOO. Results: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed to all patients. Stent implantation was performed in 20 patients who could not achieve full patency after PTA. A patient whose edema did not regress despite stent implantation underwent surgical AVF recreation. A total of six patients underwent minor/major surgical procedures. In 14 patients, edema completely regressed and the functionality of the fistula increased in the one-month follow-up after the PTA procedure. The patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24-months of follow-up, and primary patency rates were found to be 92%, 82%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PVOO should not be overlooked in patients with AVF, edema in the extremity, and no loss of fistula functionality. Percutaneous interventions should be considered primarily in the treatment of PVOO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信